Football statistics for Qingdao Huanghai

Team Info

Season

2021

Country

China

Competition

China

Chinese Super League

Summary Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Overall
Home
Away

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenzhen	22	82%	73%	59%	45%	36%	27%	14%	10.81
2	Shanghai SIPG	22	86%	68%	59%	50%	32%	18%	9%	10.43
3	Qingdao Huanghai	22	64%	59%	55%	45%	36%	27%	14%	9.91
4	Beijing Guoan	22	73%	59%	50%	50%	27%	18%	9%	9.9
5	Hebei CFFC	22	64%	59%	59%	41%	36%	27%	18%	9.81
6	Guangzhou R&F	22	68%	59%	55%	45%	14%	14%	9%	9.52
7	Shandong Luneng	22	77%	68%	50%	36%	27%	9%	0%	9.33
8	Dalian Yifang	22	64%	55%	41%	32%	18%	14%	9%	9.19
9	Changchun Yatai	22	64%	59%	50%	41%	18%	5%	5%	9.14
10	Shanghai Shenhua	22	55%	50%	45%	36%	27%	14%	0%	9
11	Wuhan Zall	22	68%	59%	41%	27%	18%	9%	5%	8.9
12	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	22	64%	50%	27%	23%	9%	9%	9%	8.68
13	Tianjin Teda	22	68%	55%	36%	18%	5%	5%	5%	8.66
14	Henan Jianye	22	50%	36%	27%	23%	18%	5%	5%	8.4
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	22	55%	41%	36%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8.34
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	22	45%	41%	27%	14%	5%	0%	0%	7.5

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenzhen	11	82%	73%	55%	45%	27%	27%	9%	11.1
2	Shanghai SIPG	11	73%	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	9%	10.2
3	Qingdao Huanghai	11	64%	55%	55%	45%	45%	36%	18%	10
4	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	73%	73%	73%	36%	27%	9%	10.45
5	Hebei CFFC	11	82%	82%	82%	55%	45%	36%	27%	11
6	Guangzhou R&F	11	45%	36%	36%	27%	9%	9%	9%	8.2
7	Shandong Luneng	11	73%	64%	45%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8.73
8	Dalian Yifang	11	64%	55%	36%	36%	18%	9%	9%	9.28
9	Changchun Yatai	11	64%	55%	55%	45%	18%	9%	9%	9.4
10	Shanghai Shenhua	11	55%	55%	55%	36%	27%	0%	0%	9.34
11	Wuhan Zall	11	73%	55%	27%	27%	18%	9%	0%	8.64
12	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	55%	36%	27%	18%	9%	9%	9%	8.09
13	Tianjin Teda	11	73%	45%	27%	9%	0%	0%	0%	8
14	Henan Jianye	11	64%	45%	27%	27%	18%	0%	0%	8.7
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	55%	45%	36%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8.63
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	55%	55%	27%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.91

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenzhen	11	82%	73%	64%	45%	45%	27%	18%	10.55
2	Shanghai SIPG	11	100%	73%	64%	55%	36%	18%	9%	10.64
3	Qingdao Huanghai	11	64%	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	9%	9.82
4	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	45%	27%	27%	18%	9%	9%	9.3
5	Hebei CFFC	11	45%	36%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	8.5
6	Guangzhou R&F	11	91%	82%	73%	64%	18%	18%	9%	10.73
7	Shandong Luneng	11	82%	73%	55%	36%	27%	9%	0%	10
8	Dalian Yifang	11	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	18%	9%	9.1
9	Changchun Yatai	11	64%	64%	45%	36%	18%	0%	0%	8.91
10	Shanghai Shenhua	11	55%	45%	36%	36%	27%	27%	0%	8.73
11	Wuhan Zall	11	64%	64%	55%	27%	18%	9%	9%	9.18
12	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	73%	64%	27%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9.28
13	Tianjin Teda	11	64%	64%	45%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9.4
14	Henan Jianye	11	36%	27%	27%	18%	18%	9%	9%	8.1
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	55%	36%	36%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	36%	27%	27%	27%	9%	0%	0%	7.09

Overall
Home
Away

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	22	73%	68%	55%	32%	23%	23%	9%	4.86
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	22	59%	41%	27%	14%	9%	9%	0%	3.32
3	Shanghai SIPG	22	95%	82%	73%	59%	45%	36%	36%	6.95
4	Henan Jianye	22	64%	55%	18%	9%	5%	5%	0%	3.45
5	Beijing Guoan	22	82%	68%	55%	41%	18%	18%	18%	5.14
6	Hebei CFFC	22	73%	64%	45%	32%	9%	0%	0%	4.1
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	22	59%	45%	27%	18%	5%	5%	5%	3.32
8	Changchun Yatai	22	55%	50%	45%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.76
9	Shandong Luneng	22	77%	68%	68%	59%	45%	23%	9%	5.71
10	Guangzhou R&F	22	50%	27%	14%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.57
11	Shanghai Shenhua	22	86%	82%	64%	50%	36%	27%	9%	5.9
12	Tianjin Teda	22	59%	50%	45%	23%	14%	9%	5%	4.14
13	Dalian Yifang	22	82%	68%	59%	45%	36%	23%	14%	5.38
14	Shenzhen	22	91%	77%	77%	59%	41%	41%	27%	7.19
15	Wuhan Zall	22	77%	36%	27%	23%	23%	9%	5%	3.95
16	Qingdao Huanghai	22	50%	36%	32%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.23

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	82%	73%	55%	27%	27%	27%	18%	5.27
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	73%	55%	36%	9%	0%	0%	0%	3.55
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	91%	73%	64%	45%	36%	36%	36%	6.8
4	Henan Jianye	11	82%	82%	18%	18%	9%	9%	0%	4.4
5	Beijing Guoan	11	91%	82%	55%	45%	18%	18%	18%	5.27
6	Hebei CFFC	11	82%	82%	55%	36%	9%	0%	0%	4.36
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	55%	45%	18%	9%	0%	0%	0%	3
8	Changchun Yatai	11	45%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.3
9	Shandong Luneng	11	73%	64%	64%	55%	45%	18%	0%	5.18
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	45%	9%	9%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.2
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	73%	73%	45%	45%	36%	27%	0%	5.67
12	Tianjin Teda	11	64%	45%	36%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.91
13	Dalian Yifang	11	82%	73%	64%	45%	45%	27%	27%	5.64
14	Shenzhen	11	91%	73%	73%	64%	55%	55%	27%	7.9
15	Wuhan Zall	11	91%	55%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	4.64
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	64%	45%	45%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.91

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	64%	64%	55%	36%	18%	18%	0%	4.4
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	45%	27%	18%	18%	18%	18%	0%	3.09
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	100%	91%	82%	73%	55%	36%	36%	7.09
4	Henan Jianye	11	45%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
5	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	55%	55%	36%	18%	18%	18%	5
6	Hebei CFFC	11	64%	45%	36%	27%	9%	0%	0%	3.8
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	64%	45%	36%	27%	9%	9%	9%	3.64
8	Changchun Yatai	11	64%	64%	64%	27%	18%	9%	0%	4.18
9	Shandong Luneng	11	82%	73%	73%	64%	45%	27%	18%	6.3
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	55%	45%	18%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.91
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	100%	91%	82%	55%	36%	27%	18%	6.09
12	Tianjin Teda	11	55%	55%	55%	18%	9%	9%	9%	4.4
13	Dalian Yifang	11	82%	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	0%	5.1
14	Shenzhen	11	91%	82%	82%	55%	27%	27%	27%	6.55
15	Wuhan Zall	11	64%	18%	18%	18%	18%	0%	0%	3.27
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	36%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.55

Overall
Home
Away

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	22	50%	32%	27%	18%	18%	14%	9%	3.48
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	22	82%	64%	41%	18%	9%	5%	5%	4.18
3	Shanghai SIPG	22	59%	32%	32%	23%	5%	5%	5%	3.48
4	Henan Jianye	22	64%	50%	45%	32%	27%	18%	9%	4.95
5	Beijing Guoan	22	77%	55%	55%	36%	27%	23%	9%	4.76
6	Hebei CFFC	22	91%	77%	55%	50%	32%	23%	18%	5.71
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	22	82%	64%	55%	41%	32%	23%	14%	5.36
8	Changchun Yatai	22	73%	68%	50%	32%	27%	27%	18%	5.38
9	Shandong Luneng	22	68%	45%	27%	14%	5%	5%	0%	3.62
10	Guangzhou R&F	22	82%	73%	68%	64%	36%	23%	23%	5.95
11	Shanghai Shenhua	22	36%	32%	23%	14%	9%	9%	5%	3.1
12	Tianjin Teda	22	77%	64%	50%	36%	23%	5%	5%	4.52
13	Dalian Yifang	22	55%	45%	41%	18%	9%	5%	5%	3.81
14	Shenzhen	22	64%	55%	27%	18%	5%	5%	0%	3.62
15	Wuhan Zall	22	77%	77%	59%	41%	32%	27%	9%	4.95
16	Qingdao Huanghai	22	95%	86%	77%	50%	45%	36%	18%	6.68

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	55%	27%	27%	18%	18%	18%	9%	3.36
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	91%	73%	55%	27%	9%	0%	0%	4.36
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	55%	27%	27%	27%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
4	Henan Jianye	11	64%	45%	45%	27%	18%	18%	0%	4.3
5	Beijing Guoan	11	91%	64%	64%	36%	27%	27%	18%	5.18
6	Hebei CFFC	11	100%	100%	73%	73%	45%	27%	27%	6.64
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	82%	64%	55%	27%	27%	18%	9%	5.09
8	Changchun Yatai	11	73%	73%	55%	27%	27%	27%	27%	6.1
9	Shandong Luneng	11	55%	45%	36%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.55
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	64%	55%	55%	45%	27%	18%	18%	5
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	36%	27%	27%	27%	18%	18%	9%	3.67
12	Tianjin Teda	11	73%	45%	45%	36%	27%	0%	0%	4.09
13	Dalian Yifang	11	55%	45%	45%	27%	9%	0%	0%	3.64
14	Shenzhen	11	36%	36%	27%	18%	9%	9%	0%	3.2
15	Wuhan Zall	11	64%	64%	55%	27%	18%	18%	9%	4
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	91%	82%	73%	45%	36%	27%	18%	6.09

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	45%	36%	27%	18%	18%	9%	9%	3.6
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	73%	55%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9%	4
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	64%	36%	36%	18%	9%	9%	9%	3.55
4	Henan Jianye	11	64%	55%	45%	36%	36%	18%	18%	5.6
5	Beijing Guoan	11	64%	45%	45%	36%	27%	18%	0%	4.3
6	Hebei CFFC	11	82%	55%	36%	27%	18%	18%	9%	4.7
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	82%	64%	55%	55%	36%	27%	18%	5.64
8	Changchun Yatai	11	73%	64%	45%	36%	27%	27%	9%	4.73
9	Shandong Luneng	11	82%	45%	18%	9%	9%	9%	0%	3.7
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	100%	91%	82%	82%	45%	27%	27%	6.82
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	36%	36%	18%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.64
12	Tianjin Teda	11	82%	82%	55%	36%	18%	9%	9%	5
13	Dalian Yifang	11	55%	45%	36%	9%	9%	9%	9%	4
14	Shenzhen	11	91%	73%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Wuhan Zall	11	91%	91%	64%	55%	45%	36%	9%	5.91
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	100%	91%	82%	55%	55%	45%	18%	7.27

Qingdao Huanghai corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Qingdao Huanghai’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Chinese Super League:

Qingdao Huanghai games have an average of 9.91 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
55% of Qingdao Huanghai’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Qingdao Huanghai has an average of 3.23 corners won per game this season.
On 5% of occasions, Qingdao Huanghai had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Qingdao Huanghai usually concedes an average of 6.68 corners per match.

You can also check out Qingdao Huanghai’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.