Qingdao Huanghai Corners Per Game
Team Info
Season
Country
2021
China
Competition
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen
|
22 | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 10.81 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
22 | 86% | 68% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 10.43 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
22 | 64% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 9.91 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
22 | 73% | 59% | 50% | 50% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.9 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC
|
22 | 64% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.81 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
22 | 68% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 14% | 14% | 9% | 9.52 |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng
|
22 | 77% | 68% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang
|
22 | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai
|
22 | 64% | 59% | 50% | 41% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 9.14 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 0% | 9 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
22 | 68% | 59% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 8.9 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
22 | 64% | 50% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.68 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda
|
22 | 68% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 8.66 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
22 | 50% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 8.4 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
22 | 55% | 41% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.34 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
22 | 45% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 11.1 |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 11 |
| 3 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 10.45 |
| 4 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 10.2 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 10 |
| 6 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 9.34 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 10 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 12 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.2 |
| 14 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.09 |
| 15 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 55% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.91 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 10.73 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 10.64 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.55 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 10 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.82 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.3 |
| 8 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.18 |
| 10 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.1 |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.91 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 13 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 8.5 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.1 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.09 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shenzhen
|
22 | 91% | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 7.19 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
22 | 95% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 6.95 |
| 4 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
22 | 86% | 82% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.9 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng
|
22 | 77% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 9% | 5.71 |
| 6 |
Dalian Yifang
|
22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.38 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.14 |
| 8 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
22 | 73% | 68% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 4.86 |
| 9 |
Tianjin Teda
|
22 | 59% | 50% | 45% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 4.14 |
| 10 |
Hebei CFFC
|
22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
22 | 77% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 5% | 3.95 |
| 12 |
Changchun Yatai
|
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
22 | 50% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.57 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
22 | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 15 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
22 | 59% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 16 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
22 | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.32 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
22 | 50% | 36% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.23 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 7.9 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 6.8 |
| 4 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5.67 |
| 5 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 8 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.18 |
| 9 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 91% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.64 |
| 10 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 11 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 14 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 16 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.2 |
| 17 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.3 |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 6 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 8 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 9 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.4 |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 11 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 12 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 13 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 15 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| 17 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
22 | 95% | 86% | 77% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 6.68 |
| 3 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 64% | 36% | 23% | 23% | 5.95 |
| 4 |
Hebei CFFC
|
22 | 91% | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai
|
22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.38 |
| 6 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
22 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.36 |
| 7 |
Henan Jianye
|
22 | 64% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall
|
22 | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan
|
22 | 77% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 4.76 |
| 10 |
Tianjin Teda
|
22 | 77% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 4.52 |
| 11 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
22 | 82% | 64% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 12 |
Dalian Yifang
|
22 | 55% | 45% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.81 |
| 13 |
Shandong Luneng
|
22 | 68% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen
|
22 | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
22 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 3.48 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
22 | 59% | 32% | 32% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.48 |
| 17 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
22 | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 3.1 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.64 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.1 |
| 4 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 6 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 7 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 8 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 10 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.67 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 16 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.36 |
| 17 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 7.27 |
| 3 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.82 |
| 4 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 5.91 |
| 5 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 6 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 7 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 9 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 10 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 11 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 12 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.55 |
| 17 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
Corner Statistics for Qingdao Huanghai: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Qingdao Huanghai across the 2021 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
Qingdao Huanghai Corner Averages (Liga China)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Qingdao Huanghai provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Qingdao Huanghai, based on the most up-to-date data from the Chinese Super League:
Matches involving Qingdao Huanghai average 9.91 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
54.55% of matches featuring Qingdao Huanghai in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Qingdao Huanghai records 3.23 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 4.55% of games, Qingdao Huanghai registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Qingdao Huanghai concedes an average of 6.68 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Qingdao Huanghai in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Qingdao Huanghai, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for Qingdao Huanghai?
According to the data, Qingdao Huanghai averages 3.23 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in Qingdao Huanghai matches?
In the Chinese Super League, matches involving Qingdao Huanghai average 9.91 total corners per game.