Season
Country
Stadium
2025
USA
Highmark Stadium
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 69% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 59% |
3 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
17 | 59% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
17 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
16 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
14 | 48% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
13 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
13 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 45% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
9 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
3 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 53% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
21 | 72% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
20 | 68% |
4 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
18 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
18 | 62% |
6 |
![]() San Antonio |
18 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
18 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
17 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 58% |
11 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
16 | 55% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
16 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 51% |
15 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
15 | 51% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
15 | 51% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 44% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 44% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
11 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 46% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
12 | 85% |
2 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 60% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 60% |
13 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 46% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Pittsburgh Riverhounds scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Pittsburgh Riverhounds is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, Pittsburgh Riverhounds has scored before the opponent in 55% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 44%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Pittsburgh Riverhounds’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Pittsburgh Riverhounds being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.