Pascoe Vale Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2019

Australia

CB Smith Reserve

Competition

Australia

Victoria NPL

Summary Matches Corners Stats

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Port Melbourne	26	96%	92%	81%	73%	58%	46%	35%	12.23
2	Kingston	26	92%	92%	77%	65%	46%	31%	23%	11.73
3	Melbourne Knights	26	85%	77%	69%	58%	42%	35%	31%	11.3
4	Dandenong Thunder	26	85%	77%	73%	54%	46%	38%	23%	11.11
5	Bentleigh Greens	29	79%	69%	62%	59%	38%	38%	24%	11.03
6	South Melbourne	26	81%	73%	65%	50%	35%	31%	12%	10.66
7	Oakleigh Cannons	28	79%	79%	71%	61%	29%	21%	11%	10.5
8	Altona Magic	26	81%	73%	50%	50%	46%	31%	15%	10.34
9	Heidelberg United	27	74%	67%	52%	44%	41%	26%	22%	10.22
10	Green Gully	27	81%	74%	67%	48%	26%	22%	7%	10.15
11	Hume City	27	70%	59%	52%	44%	33%	15%	7%	9.67
12	Avondale	28	61%	54%	46%	36%	29%	14%	7%	9.61
13	Pascoe Vale	26	73%	58%	46%	31%	23%	12%	8%	9.23
14	Dandenong City	26	81%	69%	42%	31%	19%	8%	0%	9.23

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Port Melbourne	13	100%	100%	92%	92%	77%	54%	31%	12.69
2	Kingston	13	92%	92%	77%	62%	46%	38%	31%	12.31
3	Melbourne Knights	13	85%	85%	77%	62%	38%	38%	31%	11.23
4	South Melbourne	13	92%	85%	77%	46%	38%	31%	15%	11.23
5	Oakleigh Cannons	14	86%	86%	79%	71%	36%	29%	14%	11.21
6	Dandenong Thunder	13	77%	69%	62%	62%	46%	38%	23%	10.92
7	Heidelberg United	14	79%	64%	57%	43%	36%	29%	29%	10.43
8	Green Gully	14	79%	71%	64%	50%	29%	29%	0%	10
9	Avondale	15	60%	60%	47%	27%	27%	13%	13%	9.93
10	Bentleigh Greens	13	69%	54%	54%	46%	31%	31%	8%	9.92
11	Hume City	13	85%	62%	54%	54%	38%	8%	0%	9.77
12	Altona Magic	13	85%	69%	31%	31%	31%	15%	15%	9.69
13	Pascoe Vale	13	62%	54%	46%	38%	23%	15%	15%	9.16
14	Dandenong City	13	69%	62%	38%	23%	15%	0%	0%	8.53

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Bentleigh Greens	16	88%	81%	69%	69%	44%	44%	38%	11.94
2	Port Melbourne	13	92%	85%	69%	54%	38%	38%	38%	11.76
3	Melbourne Knights	13	85%	69%	62%	54%	46%	31%	31%	11.38
4	Dandenong Thunder	13	92%	85%	85%	46%	46%	38%	23%	11.31
5	Kingston	13	92%	92%	77%	69%	46%	23%	15%	11.15
6	Altona Magic	13	77%	77%	69%	69%	62%	46%	15%	11
7	Green Gully	13	85%	77%	69%	46%	23%	15%	15%	10.31
8	South Melbourne	13	69%	62%	54%	54%	31%	31%	8%	10.07
9	Heidelberg United	13	69%	69%	46%	46%	46%	23%	15%	10
10	Dandenong City	13	92%	77%	46%	38%	23%	15%	0%	9.92
11	Oakleigh Cannons	14	71%	71%	64%	50%	21%	14%	7%	9.79
12	Hume City	14	57%	57%	50%	36%	29%	21%	14%	9.57
13	Pascoe Vale	13	85%	62%	46%	23%	23%	8%	0%	9.31
14	Avondale	13	62%	46%	46%	46%	31%	15%	0%	9.23

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Port Melbourne	26	92%	88%	81%	65%	42%	35%	15%	6.65
3	Bentleigh Greens	29	90%	79%	66%	62%	52%	31%	17%	6.03
4	Heidelberg United	27	89%	74%	67%	52%	44%	30%	15%	6
5	Altona Magic	26	92%	81%	73%	54%	35%	23%	12%	5.96
6	South Melbourne	26	88%	77%	62%	54%	38%	23%	19%	5.81
7	Avondale	28	89%	79%	68%	46%	43%	21%	11%	5.68
8	Green Gully	27	96%	67%	52%	44%	41%	37%	15%	5.59
9	Oakleigh Cannons	28	82%	71%	68%	61%	39%	14%	7%	5.5
10	Melbourne Knights	26	77%	77%	62%	50%	42%	19%	8%	5.15
11	Kingston	26	85%	65%	58%	50%	23%	4%	0%	4.85
12	Dandenong City	26	77%	69%	50%	23%	15%	8%	8%	4.42
13	Hume City	27	74%	67%	41%	26%	19%	11%	4%	4.26
14	Pascoe Vale	26	58%	50%	35%	15%	12%	12%	4%	3.77
15	Dandenong Thunder	26	54%	42%	35%	31%	27%	12%	8%	3.65

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	South Melbourne	13	100%	85%	77%	77%	54%	31%	23%	6.69
3	Oakleigh Cannons	14	93%	79%	71%	64%	43%	29%	14%	6.14
4	Green Gully	14	100%	64%	57%	50%	50%	43%	29%	6.07
5	Avondale	15	93%	80%	67%	53%	53%	27%	13%	6
6	Port Melbourne	13	92%	92%	85%	62%	31%	23%	8%	5.92
7	Bentleigh Greens	13	92%	77%	77%	69%	54%	23%	0%	5.92
8	Altona Magic	13	92%	85%	69%	38%	31%	23%	8%	5.92
9	Heidelberg United	14	86%	71%	57%	50%	43%	29%	14%	5.64
10	Melbourne Knights	13	85%	85%	62%	46%	38%	15%	8%	5.31
11	Kingston	13	85%	54%	46%	46%	31%	8%	0%	4.69
12	Hume City	13	85%	85%	46%	31%	15%	8%	0%	4.62
13	Dandenong City	13	77%	77%	46%	15%	15%	8%	8%	4.38
14	Pascoe Vale	13	54%	46%	46%	15%	15%	15%	8%	4.08
15	Dandenong Thunder	13	54%	38%	23%	23%	23%	8%	8%	3.23

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Port Melbourne	13	92%	85%	77%	69%	54%	46%	23%	7.38
3	Heidelberg United	13	92%	77%	77%	54%	46%	31%	15%	6.38
4	Bentleigh Greens	16	88%	81%	56%	56%	50%	38%	31%	6.13
5	Altona Magic	13	92%	77%	77%	69%	38%	23%	15%	6
6	Avondale	13	85%	77%	69%	38%	31%	15%	8%	5.31
7	Green Gully	13	92%	69%	46%	38%	31%	31%	0%	5.08
8	Melbourne Knights	13	69%	69%	62%	54%	46%	23%	8%	5
9	Kingston	13	85%	77%	69%	54%	15%	0%	0%	5
10	South Melbourne	13	77%	69%	46%	31%	23%	15%	15%	4.92
11	Oakleigh Cannons	14	71%	64%	64%	57%	36%	0%	0%	4.86
12	Dandenong City	13	77%	62%	54%	31%	15%	8%	8%	4.46
13	Dandenong Thunder	13	54%	46%	46%	38%	31%	15%	8%	4.08
14	Hume City	14	64%	50%	36%	21%	21%	14%	7%	3.93
15	Pascoe Vale	13	62%	54%	23%	15%	8%	8%	0%	3.46

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Dandenong Thunder	26	92%	88%	81%	77%	73%	46%	35%	7.46
3	Kingston	26	100%	92%	81%	65%	50%	35%	23%	6.88
4	Melbourne Knights	26	81%	77%	65%	58%	46%	27%	19%	6.15
5	Port Melbourne	26	85%	77%	58%	50%	38%	27%	12%	5.58
6	Pascoe Vale	26	92%	73%	65%	54%	38%	23%	4%	5.46
7	Hume City	27	93%	78%	67%	52%	33%	19%	7%	5.41
8	Oakleigh Cannons	28	86%	75%	61%	39%	32%	18%	7%	5
9	Bentleigh Greens	29	83%	59%	52%	38%	31%	17%	10%	5
10	South Melbourne	26	73%	69%	62%	46%	31%	8%	4%	4.85
11	Dandenong City	26	81%	73%	54%	35%	23%	19%	8%	4.81
12	Green Gully	27	78%	67%	52%	37%	22%	11%	0%	4.56
13	Altona Magic	26	81%	69%	46%	31%	12%	8%	0%	4.38
14	Heidelberg United	27	70%	56%	41%	33%	26%	15%	4%	4.22
15	Avondale	28	54%	39%	36%	25%	21%	11%	11%	3.93

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Dandenong Thunder	13	92%	92%	85%	85%	77%	54%	38%	7.69
3	Kingston	13	100%	92%	85%	77%	62%	38%	31%	7.62
4	Port Melbourne	13	100%	92%	85%	77%	62%	38%	15%	6.77
5	Melbourne Knights	13	77%	69%	62%	46%	38%	23%	23%	5.92
6	Hume City	13	85%	77%	69%	54%	31%	15%	0%	5.15
7	Pascoe Vale	13	92%	62%	62%	46%	31%	15%	0%	5.08
8	Oakleigh Cannons	14	86%	79%	64%	36%	36%	21%	7%	5.07
9	Heidelberg United	14	79%	64%	50%	36%	29%	14%	7%	4.79
10	South Melbourne	13	62%	62%	54%	46%	23%	8%	8%	4.54
11	Dandenong City	13	69%	69%	38%	23%	23%	15%	0%	4.15
12	Bentleigh Greens	13	77%	54%	46%	23%	8%	8%	0%	4
13	Green Gully	14	64%	57%	43%	36%	7%	7%	0%	3.93
14	Avondale	15	47%	33%	33%	27%	27%	13%	13%	3.93
15	Altona Magic	13	77%	62%	31%	23%	0%	0%	0%	3.77

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Dandenong Thunder	13	92%	85%	77%	69%	69%	38%	31%	7.23
3	Melbourne Knights	13	85%	85%	69%	69%	54%	31%	15%	6.38
4	Kingston	13	100%	92%	77%	54%	38%	31%	15%	6.15
5	Pascoe Vale	13	92%	85%	69%	62%	46%	31%	8%	5.85
6	Bentleigh Greens	16	88%	63%	56%	50%	50%	25%	19%	5.81
7	Hume City	14	100%	79%	64%	50%	36%	21%	14%	5.64
8	Dandenong City	13	92%	77%	69%	46%	23%	23%	15%	5.46
9	Green Gully	13	92%	77%	62%	38%	38%	15%	0%	5.23
10	South Melbourne	13	85%	77%	69%	46%	38%	8%	0%	5.15
11	Altona Magic	13	85%	77%	62%	38%	23%	15%	0%	5
12	Oakleigh Cannons	14	86%	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	7%	4.93
13	Port Melbourne	13	69%	62%	31%	23%	15%	15%	8%	4.38
14	Avondale	13	62%	46%	38%	23%	15%	8%	8%	3.92
15	Heidelberg United	13	62%	46%	31%	31%	23%	15%	0%	3.62

Corner Statistics for Pascoe Vale: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Pascoe Vale across the 2019 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Pascoe Vale Corner Averages (Victoria NPL)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Pascoe Vale provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Pascoe Vale, based on the most up-to-date data from the Victoria NPL:

Matches involving Pascoe Vale average 9.23 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
46.15% of matches featuring Pascoe Vale in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Pascoe Vale records 3.77 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 15.38% of games, Pascoe Vale registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Pascoe Vale concedes an average of 5.46 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Pascoe Vale in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Pascoe Vale, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Pascoe Vale?

According to the data, Pascoe Vale averages 3.77 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Pascoe Vale matches?

In the Victoria NPL, matches involving Pascoe Vale average 9.23 total corners per game.