# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 35 | 19 | 54% |
2 | Indy Eleven | 37 | 17 | 46% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 35 | 20 | 57% |
4 | Ottawa Fury | 35 | 20 | 57% |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 36 | 20 | 56% |
6 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 17 | 50% |
7 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 23 | 68% |
8 | Fresno FC | 35 | 24 | 69% |
9 | Tacoma Defiance | 34 | 19 | 56% |
10 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 23 | 68% |
11 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 15 | 42% |
12 | OKC Energy | 34 | 25 | 74% |
13 | LA Galaxy II | 35 | 23 | 66% |
14 | Sacramento Republic | 37 | 19 | 51% |
15 | Reno 1868 | 35 | 24 | 69% |
16 | Philadelphia Union II | 34 | 20 | 59% |
17 | Nashville | 36 | 15 | 42% |
18 | Rio Grande Valley | 34 | 20 | 59% |
19 | Charleston Battery | 36 | 25 | 69% |
20 | Charlotte Independence | 34 | 21 | 62% |
21 | New York RB II | 35 | 22 | 63% |
22 | Colorado Springs | 34 | 13 | 38% |
23 | Louisville City | 38 | 25 | 66% |
24 | Real Monarchs | 38 | 29 | 76% |
25 | Saint Louis | 34 | 17 | 50% |
26 | Portland Timbers II | 34 | 30 | 88% |
27 | Orange County SC | 35 | 18 | 51% |
28 | San Antonio | 34 | 23 | 68% |
29 | Sporting KC II | 34 | 24 | 71% |
30 | New Mexico United | 35 | 27 | 77% |
31 | Memphis 901 | 34 | 15 | 44% |
32 | Loudoun United | 34 | 23 | 68% |
33 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 24 | 71% |
34 | Birmingham Legion | 36 | 12 | 33% |
35 | El Paso Locomotive | 37 | 16 | 43% |
36 | Austin Bold | 36 | 21 | 58% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 18 | 11 | 61% |
2 | Indy Eleven | 19 | 7 | 37% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17 | 10 | 59% |
4 | Ottawa Fury | 18 | 9 | 50% |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 19 | 11 | 58% |
6 | Las Vegas Lights | 17 | 7 | 41% |
7 | Atlanta United II | 17 | 11 | 65% |
8 | Fresno FC | 18 | 14 | 78% |
9 | Tacoma Defiance | 17 | 13 | 76% |
10 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 17 | 11 | 65% |
11 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 19 | 8 | 42% |
12 | OKC Energy | 17 | 12 | 71% |
13 | LA Galaxy II | 17 | 12 | 71% |
14 | Sacramento Republic | 18 | 10 | 56% |
15 | Reno 1868 | 18 | 11 | 61% |
16 | Philadelphia Union II | 17 | 11 | 65% |
17 | Nashville | 19 | 7 | 37% |
18 | Rio Grande Valley | 17 | 8 | 47% |
19 | Charleston Battery | 17 | 12 | 71% |
20 | Charlotte Independence | 17 | 10 | 59% |
21 | New York RB II | 17 | 10 | 59% |
22 | Colorado Springs | 17 | 7 | 41% |
23 | Louisville City | 19 | 14 | 74% |
24 | Real Monarchs | 19 | 12 | 63% |
25 | Saint Louis | 17 | 9 | 53% |
26 | Portland Timbers II | 17 | 16 | 94% |
27 | Orange County SC | 17 | 8 | 47% |
28 | San Antonio | 17 | 11 | 65% |
29 | Sporting KC II | 17 | 13 | 76% |
30 | New Mexico United | 17 | 12 | 71% |
31 | Memphis 901 | 17 | 8 | 47% |
32 | Loudoun United | 17 | 13 | 76% |
33 | Hartford Athletic | 17 | 14 | 82% |
34 | Birmingham Legion | 17 | 2 | 12% |
35 | El Paso Locomotive | 18 | 9 | 50% |
36 | Austin Bold | 18 | 11 | 61% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 17 | 8 | 47% |
2 | Indy Eleven | 18 | 10 | 56% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 18 | 10 | 56% |
4 | Ottawa Fury | 17 | 11 | 65% |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 17 | 9 | 53% |
6 | Las Vegas Lights | 17 | 10 | 59% |
7 | Atlanta United II | 17 | 12 | 71% |
8 | Fresno FC | 17 | 10 | 59% |
9 | Tacoma Defiance | 17 | 6 | 35% |
10 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 17 | 12 | 71% |
11 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 17 | 7 | 41% |
12 | OKC Energy | 17 | 13 | 76% |
13 | LA Galaxy II | 18 | 11 | 61% |
14 | Sacramento Republic | 19 | 9 | 47% |
15 | Reno 1868 | 17 | 13 | 76% |
16 | Philadelphia Union II | 17 | 9 | 53% |
17 | Nashville | 17 | 8 | 47% |
18 | Rio Grande Valley | 17 | 12 | 71% |
19 | Charleston Battery | 19 | 13 | 68% |
20 | Charlotte Independence | 17 | 11 | 65% |
21 | New York RB II | 18 | 12 | 67% |
22 | Colorado Springs | 17 | 6 | 35% |
23 | Louisville City | 19 | 11 | 58% |
24 | Real Monarchs | 19 | 17 | 89% |
25 | Saint Louis | 17 | 8 | 47% |
26 | Portland Timbers II | 17 | 14 | 82% |
27 | Orange County SC | 18 | 10 | 56% |
28 | San Antonio | 17 | 12 | 71% |
29 | Sporting KC II | 17 | 11 | 65% |
30 | New Mexico United | 18 | 15 | 83% |
31 | Memphis 901 | 17 | 7 | 41% |
32 | Loudoun United | 17 | 10 | 59% |
33 | Hartford Athletic | 17 | 10 | 59% |
34 | Birmingham Legion | 19 | 10 | 53% |
35 | El Paso Locomotive | 19 | 7 | 37% |
36 | Austin Bold | 18 | 10 | 56% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Nashville’s case, their BTTS statistics in the USL Championship 2019 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Nashville in the competition:
You can also see Nashville’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.