Season
Country
Stadium
2025/26
Belgium
Soevereinstadion
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Olympic Charleroi |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Club Brugge II |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Lokeren-Temse |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
KRC Genk II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
KAA Gent II |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
RWDM |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Olympic Charleroi |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Club Brugge II |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Lokeren-Temse |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
KRC Genk II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
KAA Gent II |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
RWDM |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Olympic Charleroi |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Club Brugge II |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Lokeren-Temse |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 15 |
KRC Genk II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
KAA Gent II |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
RWDM |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Lommel United’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, Lommel United’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 100% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Lommel United this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the Lommel United’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.