Season
2025
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
11 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Miami FC II |
10 | 67% |
5 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
10 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 50% |
10 |
![]() San Antonio |
8 | 50% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 47% |
13 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 47% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 44% |
15 |
![]() Orange County SC |
6 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 31% |
22 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 24% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 19% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 100% |
2 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 86% |
3 |
![]() Orange County SC |
5 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Louisville City |
5 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 70% |
7 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 67% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
9 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 67% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 67% |
11 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 63% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 44% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
3 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
3 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 29% |
22 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
2 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
24 |
![]() Rhode Island |
1 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 83% |
2 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Miami FC II |
3 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
4 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
3 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Lexington |
3 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 40% |
14 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
3 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
2 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
3 | 30% |
17 |
![]() San Antonio |
2 | 29% |
18 |
![]() Loudoun United |
2 | 25% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 25% |
20 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
2 | 25% |
21 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
2 | 22% |
22 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 17% |
23 |
![]() Orange County SC |
1 | 14% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
13 | 81% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
13 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 68% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 68% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
10 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 61% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Orange County SC |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 56% |
12 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
13 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 53% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
8 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 50% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 47% |
19 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
20 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
5 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
5 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
4 | 26% |
24 |
![]() New Mexico United |
3 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
4 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
3 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 37% |
15 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
2 | 33% |
17 |
![]() San Antonio |
3 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
2 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
3 | 30% |
20 |
![]() Orange County SC |
2 | 28% |
21 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 28% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
2 | 28% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
1 | 14% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Orange County SC |
6 | 85% |
3 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 83% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
7 | 77% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 75% |
6 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 75% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 75% |
8 |
![]() San Antonio |
5 | 71% |
9 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 70% |
10 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
4 | 66% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
5 | 62% |
12 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 60% |
13 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 57% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 55% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 55% |
17 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 55% |
18 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
4 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 42% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
3 | 42% |
21 |
![]() Miami FC II |
2 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
3 | 33% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
2 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
1 | 16% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Lexington scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Lexington is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, Lexington has scored before the opponent in 44% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 56%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Lexington’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Lexington being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.