Season
Country
2021/22
Denmark
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Copenhagen |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Midtjylland |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 3 |
AaB |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 4 |
Nordsjaelland |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 |
AGF |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Brondby |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 7 |
FC Helsingør |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 8 |
Sonderjyske |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 9 |
Horsens |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 10 |
Randers |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 11 |
Silkeborg |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 12 |
OB |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 13 |
Hobro |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Lyngby |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 15 |
Viborg |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 16 |
Esbjerg |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 17 |
Vejle |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 18 |
Fremad Amager |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 19 |
Fredericia |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 20 |
Thisted |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 21 |
Brabrand Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 22 |
HB Køge |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 23 |
Skive IK |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 24 |
Vendsyssel |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 25 |
Nykøbing |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 26 |
Roskilde |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 27 |
Næstved |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
AB |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 29 |
Bronshoj |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 30 |
Hvidovre |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 31 |
Marienlyst W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 32 |
B.93 |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
Kjellerup W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 34 |
HIK |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 35 |
Dalum |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Greve |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
VSK Århus |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 38 |
Middelfart |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 39 |
Avarta W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 40 |
Kolding IF |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 41 |
Skovshoved |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Sydvest W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Jammerbugt |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Frem |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Lyseng |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 46 |
Næsby W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 47 |
Aarhus Fremad |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
Hillerød |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Holbæk B&I |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 50 |
AB Tårnby W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Copenhagen |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Midtjylland |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 3 |
AaB |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Nordsjaelland |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
AGF |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Brondby |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
FC Helsingør |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 |
Sonderjyske |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 |
Horsens |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 |
Randers |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Silkeborg |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
OB |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 13 |
Hobro |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Lyngby |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Viborg |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Esbjerg |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Vejle |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 18 |
Fremad Amager |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 19 |
Fredericia |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 20 |
Thisted |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Brabrand Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 22 |
HB Køge |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Skive IK |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
Vendsyssel |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Nykøbing |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Roskilde |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 27 |
Næstved |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
AB |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Bronshoj |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Hvidovre |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 31 |
Marienlyst W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 32 |
B.93 |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Kjellerup W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 34 |
HIK |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 35 |
Dalum |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Greve |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
VSK Århus |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 38 |
Middelfart |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Avarta W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 40 |
Kolding IF |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 41 |
Skovshoved |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Sydvest W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Jammerbugt |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Frem |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Lyseng |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Næsby W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 47 |
Aarhus Fremad |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Hillerød |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Holbæk B&I |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 50 |
AB Tårnby W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Copenhagen |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Midtjylland |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
AaB |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 4 |
Nordsjaelland |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
AGF |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Brondby |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 7 |
FC Helsingør |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 |
Sonderjyske |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 9 |
Horsens |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 |
Randers |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 11 |
Silkeborg |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 12 |
OB |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 13 |
Hobro |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Lyngby |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Viborg |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 16 |
Esbjerg |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 17 |
Vejle |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 18 |
Fremad Amager |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 19 |
Fredericia |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |
Thisted |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 21 |
Brabrand Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
HB Køge |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 23 |
Skive IK |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Vendsyssel |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 25 |
Nykøbing |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 26 |
Roskilde |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Næstved |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
AB |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 29 |
Bronshoj |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 30 |
Hvidovre |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 31 |
Marienlyst W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
B.93 |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 33 |
Kjellerup W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 34 |
HIK |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Dalum |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Greve |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
VSK Århus |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 38 |
Middelfart |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 39 |
Avarta W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Kolding IF |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 41 |
Skovshoved |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Sydvest W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Jammerbugt |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Frem |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Lyseng |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 46 |
Næsby W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Aarhus Fremad |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
Hillerød |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Holbæk B&I |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
AB Tårnby W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Kvik/Aalestrup’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Danish Cup 2021/2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Kvik/Aalestrup in the competition:
You can also see Kvik/Aalestrup’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.