Season
Country
Stadium
2025/26
Belgium
Olympisch Stadion
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Waasland-Beveren |
9 | 56% | 22% | 11% |
2 |
![]() AS Eupen |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% |
3 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
9 | 44% | 22% | 22% |
4 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
8 | 75% | 25% | 25% |
5 |
![]() Lommel United |
9 | 56% | 56% | 44% |
6 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
8 | 100% | 75% | 38% |
7 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% |
8 |
![]() Francs Borains |
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% |
9 |
![]() RFC Liege |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% |
10 |
![]() Lierse Kempenzonen |
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% |
11 |
![]() RWDM |
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% |
12 |
![]() Olympic Charleroi |
8 | 63% | 38% | 38% |
13 |
![]() Club Brugge II |
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% |
14 |
![]() Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 100% | 78% | 78% |
15 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht II |
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% |
16 |
![]() KRC Genk II |
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% |
17 |
![]() KAA Gent II |
8 | 50% | 13% | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Waasland-Beveren |
9 | 44% | 11% | 11% |
2 |
![]() AS Eupen |
9 | 67% | 67% | 22% |
3 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
9 | 67% | 22% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
8 | 75% | 38% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Lommel United |
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% |
6 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
8 | 75% | 38% | 13% |
7 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
9 | 78% | 44% | 22% |
8 |
![]() Francs Borains |
8 | 88% | 50% | 38% |
9 |
![]() RFC Liege |
9 | 56% | 11% | 11% |
10 |
![]() Lierse Kempenzonen |
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% |
11 |
![]() RWDM |
8 | 75% | 25% | 25% |
12 |
![]() Olympic Charleroi |
8 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
13 |
![]() Club Brugge II |
8 | 75% | 38% | 25% |
14 |
![]() Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 89% | 67% | 56% |
15 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht II |
8 | 75% | 25% | 13% |
16 |
![]() KRC Genk II |
8 | 75% | 63% | 25% |
17 |
![]() KAA Gent II |
8 | 38% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Waasland-Beveren |
9 | 78% | 33% | 11% |
2 |
![]() AS Eupen |
9 | 67% | 22% | 0% |
3 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% |
4 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% |
5 |
![]() Lommel United |
9 | 89% | 44% | 22% |
6 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
8 | 100% | 88% | 50% |
7 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
9 | 56% | 22% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Francs Borains |
8 | 88% | 13% | 13% |
9 |
![]() RFC Liege |
9 | 89% | 44% | 33% |
10 |
![]() Lierse Kempenzonen |
9 | 67% | 33% | 33% |
11 |
![]() RWDM |
8 | 38% | 13% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Olympic Charleroi |
8 | 50% | 25% | 13% |
13 |
![]() Club Brugge II |
8 | 75% | 25% | 13% |
14 |
![]() Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 89% | 67% | 56% |
15 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht II |
8 | 63% | 63% | 38% |
16 |
![]() KRC Genk II |
8 | 38% | 13% | 13% |
17 |
![]() KAA Gent II |
8 | 63% | 50% | 13% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of De Kielse Ratten’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 38% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, De Mannekes’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 50% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Purple White Army this season in the First Division B:
You can follow the Purple White Army’s card situation in First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.