Season
2016
Country
Iceland
Stadium
Eskjuvöllur
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Grindavík | 22 | 10 | 45% |
2 | KA | 22 | 9 | 41% |
3 | Leiknir Reykjavík | 22 | 10 | 45% |
4 | Keflavík | 22 | 10 | 45% |
5 | Fram | 22 | 13 | 59% |
6 | Thór | 22 | 15 | 68% |
7 | Selfoss | 22 | 11 | 50% |
8 | Haukar | 22 | 12 | 55% |
9 | HK | 22 | 15 | 68% |
10 | Leiknir Fáskrúdsfj. | 22 | 11 | 50% |
11 | Fjardabyggd | 22 | 14 | 64% |
12 | Huginn | 22 | 10 | 45% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Grindavík | 11 | 4 | 36% |
2 | KA | 11 | 4 | 36% |
3 | Leiknir Reykjavík | 11 | 4 | 36% |
4 | Keflavík | 11 | 4 | 36% |
5 | Fram | 11 | 8 | 73% |
6 | Thór | 11 | 8 | 73% |
7 | Selfoss | 11 | 5 | 45% |
8 | Haukar | 11 | 7 | 64% |
9 | HK | 11 | 8 | 73% |
10 | Leiknir Fáskrúdsfj. | 11 | 6 | 55% |
11 | Fjardabyggd | 11 | 10 | 91% |
12 | Huginn | 11 | 2 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Grindavík | 11 | 6 | 55% |
2 | KA | 11 | 5 | 45% |
3 | Leiknir Reykjavík | 11 | 6 | 55% |
4 | Keflavík | 11 | 6 | 55% |
5 | Fram | 11 | 5 | 45% |
6 | Thór | 11 | 7 | 64% |
7 | Selfoss | 11 | 6 | 55% |
8 | Haukar | 11 | 5 | 45% |
9 | HK | 11 | 7 | 64% |
10 | Leiknir Fáskrúdsfj. | 11 | 5 | 45% |
11 | Fjardabyggd | 11 | 4 | 36% |
12 | Huginn | 11 | 8 | 73% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Fjardabyggd’s case, their BTTS statistics in the 1. Deild 2016 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Fjardabyggd in the competition:
You can also see Fjardabyggd’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.