Guizhou Zhicheng Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2021

China

Guiyang Olympic Sports Center

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	21%	15%	9%	9.61
2	Meizhou Hakka	34	71%	65%	47%	35%	24%	6%	3%	9.38
3	Nanjing City	34	59%	44%	29%	26%	15%	9%	3%	9
4	Suzhou Dongwu	34	62%	56%	47%	35%	18%	15%	6%	8.97
5	Beijing BG	34	56%	50%	41%	32%	26%	15%	12%	8.85
6	Kunshan	34	50%	47%	35%	29%	24%	15%	9%	8.78
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	29%	24%	12%	6%	3%	8.68
8	Shenyang Urban	34	53%	41%	32%	26%	24%	12%	9%	8.53
9	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	56%	44%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	8.48
10	Hangzhou	34	59%	47%	24%	24%	18%	12%	9%	8.29
11	BIT	34	47%	32%	24%	15%	6%	6%	6%	8.23
12	Nantong Zhiyun	34	44%	35%	24%	24%	18%	15%	9%	8.1
13	Wuhan Three Towns	34	56%	44%	26%	21%	15%	3%	0%	7.97
14	Chengdu Better City FC	34	47%	32%	24%	18%	18%	9%	6%	7.87
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	44%	29%	24%	21%	15%	9%	9%	7.85
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	38%	26%	18%	9%	9%	3%	0%	7.14
17	Zibo Cuju	34	50%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3%	3%	7.13
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	41%	26%	21%	15%	9%	3%	0%	7.01

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Nanjing City	17	65%	59%	41%	41%	24%	12%	0%	9.85
2	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	59%	41%	35%	18%	12%	6%	9.66
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	65%	59%	47%	35%	29%	6%	6%	9.44
4	Beijing BG	17	59%	53%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	9.41
5	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	6%	9
6	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	8.84
7	Kunshan	17	53%	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	12%	8.82
8	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59%	47%	29%	29%	18%	18%	12%	8.69
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	8
10	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	0%	0%	7.94
11	Hangzhou	17	59%	41%	12%	12%	6%	6%	6%	7.89
12	Chengdu Better City FC	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	7.88
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	0%	0%	7.82
14	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47%	35%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.81
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	6%	0%	7.71
16	BIT	17	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	7.43
17	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	24%	12%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6.94
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	35%	24%	24%	12%	12%	6%	0%	6.87

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	12%	10.19
2	Suzhou Dongwu	17	76%	76%	71%	53%	35%	29%	12%	10.06
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	76%	71%	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	9.32
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	9
5	BIT	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	12%	12%	12%	8.94
6	Kunshan	17	47%	41%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	8.71
7	Hangzhou	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	29%	18%	12%	8.71
8	Beijing BG	17	53%	47%	41%	29%	18%	0%	0%	8.25
9	Nanjing City	17	53%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	8.2
10	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	24%	24%	18%	6%	0%	8.11
11	Shenyang Urban	17	41%	35%	35%	35%	29%	12%	12%	8.07
12	Chengdu Better City FC	17	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	6%	6%	7.88
13	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.75
14	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	35%	24%	18%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.69
15	Nantong Zhiyun	17	29%	24%	18%	18%	18%	12%	6%	7.43
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	41%	29%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	7.43
17	Zibo Cuju	17	53%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	7.34
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	29%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	6.2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Meizhou Hakka	34	79%	74%	56%	44%	38%	29%	15%	5.66
3	Hangzhou	34	82%	62%	50%	44%	38%	26%	9%	5.47
4	Wuhan Three Towns	34	88%	76%	59%	38%	21%	21%	15%	5.39
5	Nantong Zhiyun	34	82%	71%	44%	35%	26%	15%	6%	5.2
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	76%	56%	50%	38%	29%	26%	18%	5.13
7	Chengdu Better City FC	34	79%	65%	50%	35%	18%	12%	9%	5.03
8	Kunshan	34	76%	62%	53%	32%	18%	12%	6%	4.84
9	Suzhou Dongwu	34	71%	56%	41%	26%	21%	18%	9%	4.52
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	68%	53%	41%	26%	12%	9%	6%	4.18
11	Shenyang Urban	34	59%	35%	29%	18%	12%	9%	9%	3.7
12	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	50%	41%	35%	26%	9%	6%	3%	3.63
13	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	38%	35%	24%	24%	18%	9%	6%	3.54
14	Beijing BG	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	6%	6%	6%	3.52
15	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	41%	32%	24%	12%	6%	3%	0%	3.07
16	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	47%	35%	21%	15%	3%	3%	0%	3.03
17	BIT	34	35%	24%	21%	9%	9%	6%	6%	3.03
18	Nanjing City	34	44%	32%	21%	15%	6%	3%	3%	2.97
19	Zibo Cuju	34	41%	26%	12%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.52

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Hangzhou	17	94%	71%	53%	47%	41%	18%	6%	5.71
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	88%	76%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.69
4	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	76%	65%	59%	35%	35%	29%	18%	5.53
5	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	53%	41%	35%	18%	0%	5.44
6	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	76%	53%	35%	24%	24%	12%	5.44
7	Kunshan	17	82%	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	4.94
8	Chengdu Better City FC	17	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.88
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.47
10	Shenyang Urban	17	71%	41%	35%	18%	12%	6%	6%	3.93
11	Suzhou Dongwu	17	53%	41%	29%	18%	18%	18%	6%	3.81
12	Nanjing City	17	41%	41%	35%	29%	12%	6%	6%	3.71
13	Beijing BG	17	65%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	6%	3.59
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	47%	41%	35%	24%	12%	12%	6%	3.59
15	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	24%	24%	24%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.42
16	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	41%	29%	18%	18%	6%	6%	0%	3.07
17	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	35%	24%	18%	18%	6%	6%	0%	2.8
18	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.75
19	BIT	17	18%	12%	12%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	71%	53%	47%	41%	29%	18%	5.63
3	Wuhan Three Towns	17	94%	76%	65%	41%	18%	18%	18%	5.35
4	Hangzhou	17	71%	53%	47%	41%	35%	35%	12%	5.24
5	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	76%	59%	41%	18%	12%	6%	5.19
6	Suzhou Dongwu	17	88%	71%	53%	35%	24%	18%	12%	5.18
7	Nantong Zhiyun	17	71%	59%	35%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.93
8	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	76%	47%	41%	41%	24%	24%	18%	4.75
9	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	47%	24%	12%	6%	6%	4.71
10	BIT	17	53%	35%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	3.94
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	71%	53%	35%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
12	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	53%	41%	35%	29%	6%	0%	0%	3.67
13	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	53%	47%	24%	24%	18%	6%	6%	3.63
14	Shenyang Urban	17	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	12%	3.47
15	Beijing BG	17	65%	35%	24%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.44
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	47%	41%	29%	6%	6%	0%	0%	3.36
17	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	53%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3
18	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.27
19	Nanjing City	17	47%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.27

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65%	59%	53%	47%	32%	26%	15%	6.07
3	Nanjing City	34	71%	68%	59%	38%	29%	24%	15%	6.03
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	74%	62%	59%	44%	32%	21%	15%	5.45
5	Beijing BG	34	82%	62%	56%	41%	29%	26%	12%	5.33
6	BIT	34	79%	79%	56%	29%	18%	15%	9%	5.2
7	Shenyang Urban	34	74%	62%	38%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.83
8	Zibo Cuju	34	74%	65%	47%	41%	12%	3%	3%	4.61
9	Suzhou Dongwu	34	74%	53%	44%	29%	24%	15%	9%	4.45
10	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	62%	47%	32%	18%	15%	9%	6%	4.07
11	Kunshan	34	56%	41%	29%	24%	15%	15%	9%	3.94
12	Meizhou Hakka	34	59%	53%	29%	18%	12%	3%	3%	3.72
13	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	74%	47%	26%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
14	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	53%	38%	29%	18%	6%	6%	3%	3.55
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	53%	35%	26%	15%	12%	9%	3%	3.38
16	Nantong Zhiyun	34	41%	35%	24%	18%	9%	3%	3%	2.9
17	Chengdu Better City FC	34	50%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	3%	2.84
18	Hangzhou	34	50%	24%	15%	12%	6%	6%	3%	2.82
19	Wuhan Three Towns	34	35%	21%	15%	9%	9%	6%	0%	2.58

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Nanjing City	17	65%	59%	59%	47%	35%	24%	18%	6.14
3	Beijing BG	17	88%	65%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	5.82
4	BIT	17	76%	76%	65%	35%	12%	12%	6%	5.43
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	47%	47%	41%	35%	18%	18%	12%	5.42
6	Shenyang Urban	17	88%	71%	41%	29%	12%	12%	6%	5.07
7	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.87
8	Zibo Cuju	17	71%	65%	41%	35%	6%	0%	0%	4.19
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	47%	35%	29%	12%	12%	6%	4.13
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	71%	53%	41%	24%	18%	18%	6%	4.12
11	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.07
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	4
13	Kunshan	17	59%	47%	29%	24%	12%	12%	12%	3.88
14	Meizhou Hakka	17	65%	65%	18%	12%	12%	6%	6%	3.75
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	76%	41%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.53
16	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53%	47%	24%	18%	18%	6%	6%	3.25
17	Chengdu Better City FC	17	59%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3
18	Wuhan Three Towns	17	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	0%	2.38
19	Hangzhou	17	41%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.18

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	59%	47%	35%	18%	6.56
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	71%	71%	59%	47%	29%	18%	6
4	Nanjing City	17	76%	76%	59%	29%	24%	24%	12%	5.93
5	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	65%	53%	47%	18%	6%	6%	5.07
6	BIT	17	82%	82%	47%	24%	24%	18%	12%	5
7	Suzhou Dongwu	17	76%	59%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
8	Beijing BG	17	76%	59%	47%	35%	24%	24%	0%	4.81
9	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.6
10	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	59%	47%	35%	12%	12%	12%	6%	4.07
11	Kunshan	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	18%	18%	6%	4
12	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	71%	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.81
13	Meizhou Hakka	17	53%	41%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	3.69
14	Hangzhou	17	59%	41%	24%	24%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
15	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	47%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	3
16	Wuhan Three Towns	17	41%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.76
17	Chengdu Better City FC	17	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.69
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	35%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	2.53
19	Nantong Zhiyun	17	29%	24%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	2.5

Corner Statistics for Guizhou Zhicheng: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Guizhou Zhicheng across the 2021 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Guizhou Zhicheng Corner Averages (China League 1)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Guizhou Zhicheng provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Guizhou Zhicheng, based on the most up-to-date data from the China League One:

Matches involving Guizhou Zhicheng average 7.14 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
17.65% of matches featuring Guizhou Zhicheng in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Guizhou Zhicheng records 3.07 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 11.76% of games, Guizhou Zhicheng registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Guizhou Zhicheng concedes an average of 4.07 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Guizhou Zhicheng in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Guizhou Zhicheng, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Guizhou Zhicheng?

According to the data, Guizhou Zhicheng averages 3.07 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Guizhou Zhicheng matches?

In the China League One, matches involving Guizhou Zhicheng average 7.14 total corners per game.