Guangxi Hengchen Corners Per Game
Team Info
Season
Country
2026
China
Competition
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
22 | 91% | 82% | 68% | 59% | 55% | 41% | 27% | 11.82 |
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
21 | 95% | 81% | 67% | 52% | 48% | 33% | 19% | 11.28 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
22 | 86% | 73% | 50% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 10.41 |
| 4 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
21 | 76% | 71% | 48% | 43% | 33% | 33% | 19% | 10.05 |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi
|
21 | 81% | 71% | 57% | 33% | 29% | 24% | 19% | 10 |
| 6 |
Dongguan United
|
22 | 77% | 68% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 14% | 9.82 |
| 7 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9.78 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
22 | 82% | 64% | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 9.77 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Union
|
21 | 76% | 62% | 48% | 33% | 19% | 14% | 10% | 9.38 |
| 10 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
20 | 70% | 55% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 5% | 9.25 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
21 | 71% | 52% | 43% | 33% | 19% | 19% | 5% | 9.05 |
| 12 |
Nanjing City
|
22 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 8.73 |
| 13 |
Changchun Yatai
|
21 | 52% | 38% | 33% | 24% | 24% | 14% | 10% | 8.38 |
| 14 |
Yanbian Longding
|
22 | 64% | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 8.37 |
| 15 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
22 | 59% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
22 | 55% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 7.78 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 12 |
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
11 | 100% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 11.55 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 11.54 |
| 4 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 10.73 |
| 5 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10 |
| 6 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Union
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10 |
| 8 |
Dongguan United
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 9.08 |
| 9 |
Dalian Huayi
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9 |
| 10 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
12 | 75% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 8.84 |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 8.73 |
| 12 |
Yanbian Longding
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 13 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.51 |
| 14 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.45 |
| 15 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 7.55 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.18 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
11 | 100% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 11.64 |
| 2 |
Dalian Huayi
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 70% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 11.1 |
| 3 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 11 |
| 4 |
Dongguan United
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10.7 |
| 5 |
Nanjing City
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 10.27 |
| 6 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 10.09 |
| 7 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 9.75 |
| 8 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 0% | 9.7 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
12 | 83% | 75% | 67% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 9.58 |
| 10 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.27 |
| 11 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 8.82 |
| 12 |
Shaanxi Union
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.82 |
| 13 |
Yanbian Longding
|
11 | 64% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.09 |
| 14 |
Changchun Yatai
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 8 |
| 15 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8 |
| 16 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
10 | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
21 | 86% | 86% | 71% | 71% | 52% | 43% | 38% | 6.95 |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
21 | 90% | 90% | 76% | 67% | 62% | 43% | 29% | 6.76 |
| 4 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
22 | 91% | 77% | 68% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5.68 |
| 5 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
22 | 82% | 77% | 73% | 64% | 41% | 23% | 9% | 5.59 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 14% | 5.55 |
| 7 |
Dalian Huayi
|
21 | 86% | 67% | 62% | 57% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 5.52 |
| 8 |
Nanjing City
|
22 | 82% | 59% | 50% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 4.59 |
| 9 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
21 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 33% | 19% | 0% | 4.48 |
| 10 |
Shaanxi Union
|
21 | 81% | 57% | 38% | 19% | 19% | 14% | 10% | 4.33 |
| 11 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
22 | 73% | 64% | 59% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 0% | 4.32 |
| 12 |
Dongguan United
|
22 | 91% | 45% | 23% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 4.18 |
| 13 |
Changchun Yatai
|
21 | 62% | 62% | 43% | 33% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
22 | 82% | 55% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 4.09 |
| 15 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
20 | 85% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 3.7 |
| 16 |
Yanbian Longding
|
22 | 64% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.05 |
| 17 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
22 | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.05 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
11 | 100% | 100% | 82% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 7.64 |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
10 | 100% | 100% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 40% | 30% | 7.2 |
| 4 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 91% | 91% | 73% | 45% | 18% | 7.18 |
| 5 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
11 | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.82 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
11 | 100% | 82% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 6.27 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Union
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 70% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 5.3 |
| 9 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.09 |
| 10 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
12 | 92% | 67% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.67 |
| 11 |
Dongguan United
|
12 | 92% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 4.5 |
| 12 |
Dalian Huayi
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 13 |
Nanjing City
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 4.27 |
| 14 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 15 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
8 | 100% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.13 |
| 16 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 17 |
Yanbian Longding
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Dalian Huayi
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 6.7 |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 6.36 |
| 4 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 6.2 |
| 5 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5.09 |
| 6 |
Nanjing City
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.91 |
| 7 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.27 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai
|
10 | 60% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 9 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 11 |
Dongguan United
|
10 | 90% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 12 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
12 | 58% | 50% | 50% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 13 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
12 | 75% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.42 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
10 | 70% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 15 |
Shaanxi Union
|
11 | 64% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.18 |
| 16 |
Yanbian Longding
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.45 |
| 17 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
11 | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.09 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
22 | 91% | 82% | 68% | 59% | 41% | 36% | 23% | 6.14 |
| 3 |
Dongguan United
|
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 4 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
20 | 85% | 80% | 60% | 45% | 35% | 25% | 15% | 5.55 |
| 5 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
22 | 86% | 77% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.45 |
| 6 |
Yanbian Longding
|
22 | 82% | 64% | 59% | 55% | 32% | 14% | 14% | 5.32 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Union
|
21 | 86% | 67% | 57% | 29% | 19% | 14% | 10% | 5.05 |
| 8 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
22 | 82% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 14% | 4.82 |
| 9 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
22 | 73% | 64% | 50% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
21 | 76% | 71% | 57% | 29% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4.57 |
| 11 |
Dalian Huayi
|
21 | 76% | 57% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 10% | 4.48 |
| 12 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
21 | 71% | 48% | 38% | 29% | 24% | 14% | 5% | 4.33 |
| 13 |
Changchun Yatai
|
21 | 76% | 62% | 43% | 33% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 4.24 |
| 14 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
22 | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 0% | 4.23 |
| 15 |
Nanjing City
|
22 | 64% | 50% | 23% | 23% | 18% | 14% | 14% | 4.14 |
| 16 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
22 | 73% | 50% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 3.91 |
| 17 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
21 | 71% | 38% | 24% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.73 |
| 3 |
Yanbian Longding
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 4 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.7 |
| 5 |
Dongguan United
|
12 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 4.58 |
| 6 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.55 |
| 7 |
Dalian Huayi
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.55 |
| 8 |
Shaanxi Union
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 9 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 10 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 4.36 |
| 11 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
12 | 75% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 12 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
11 | 73% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 14 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City
|
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 2.91 |
| 17 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Dongguan United
|
10 | 90% | 90% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 6.9 |
| 3 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 4 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
12 | 92% | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 6.33 |
| 5 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
12 | 92% | 83% | 75% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 6.08 |
| 6 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5.91 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
10 | 100% | 100% | 80% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.9 |
| 8 |
Yanbian Longding
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 5.64 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Union
|
11 | 91% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 10 |
Nanjing City
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5.36 |
| 11 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 5.27 |
| 12 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 14 |
Dalian Huayi
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 4.4 |
| 15 |
Changchun Yatai
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.9 |
| 16 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
11 | 91% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 17 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 3.6 |
Corner Statistics for Guangxi Hengchen: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Guangxi Hengchen across the 2026 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
Guangxi Hengchen Corner Averages (China League 1)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Guangxi Hengchen provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Guangxi Hengchen, based on the most up-to-date data from the China League One:
Matches involving Guangxi Hengchen average 11.28 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
66.67% of matches featuring Guangxi Hengchen in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Guangxi Hengchen records 6.95 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 71.43% of games, Guangxi Hengchen registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Guangxi Hengchen concedes an average of 4.33 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Guangxi Hengchen in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Guangxi Hengchen, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for Guangxi Hengchen?
According to the data, Guangxi Hengchen averages 6.95 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in Guangxi Hengchen matches?
In the China League One, matches involving Guangxi Hengchen average 11.28 total corners per game.