Football statistics for TransINVEST Vilnius
Team Info
Season
2024/25
Country
Europe
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Cercle Brugge |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 2 |
Panevėžys |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Caernarfon Town |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 4 |
Borac Banja Luka |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 5 |
Hirnyk |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Ilves |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 |
Paide |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 8 |
Tallinna Kalev |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 10 |
Atlètic Club d'Escaldes |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Sabah |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 12 |
TransINVEST Vilnius |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Velež |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 14 |
Marsaxlokk |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 15 |
FA Šiauliai |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Vllaznia Shkodër |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 17 |
CFR Cluj |
6 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Mornar |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 19 |
Shkendija |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |
Torpedo Kutaisi |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 21 |
FC Avan Academy |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 22 |
Isloch |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Sumqayıt |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 24 |
Videoton |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 25 |
Neman Grodno |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
FC Urartu |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 27 |
Noah |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 28 |
Tirana |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 29 |
Hajduk Split |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Budućnost |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 31 |
Śląsk Wrocław |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 32 |
Maccabi Haifa |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
Vaduz |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 34 |
Cherno More |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 35 |
Puskás |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 36 |
Breidablik |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 37 |
Valur |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 38 |
Zrinjski |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 39 |
Cliftonville |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 40 |
Legia Warszawa |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 41 |
Copenhagen |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| 42 |
Spartak Trnava |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 43 |
Drita |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 44 |
DAC |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 45 |
Finalist 1 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Vitória Guimarães |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 47 |
Brøndby |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 48 |
AEK Larnaca |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Paphos |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 50 |
Paksi SE |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Cercle Brugge |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 2 |
Panevėžys |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Caernarfon Town |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Borac Banja Luka |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 5 |
Hirnyk |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Ilves |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 |
Paide |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 8 |
Tallinna Kalev |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 |
Atlètic Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Sabah |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 12 |
TransINVEST Vilnius |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Velež |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 14 |
Marsaxlokk |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 15 |
FA Šiauliai |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Vllaznia Shkodër |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
CFR Cluj |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Mornar |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 19 |
Shkendija |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 20 |
Torpedo Kutaisi |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 21 |
FC Avan Academy |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 22 |
Isloch |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Sumqayıt |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
Videoton |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Neman Grodno |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
FC Urartu |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Noah |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 28 |
Tirana |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Hajduk Split |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Budućnost |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 31 |
Śląsk Wrocław |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 32 |
Maccabi Haifa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Vaduz |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 34 |
Cherno More |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 35 |
Puskás |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 36 |
Breidablik |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 37 |
Valur |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 38 |
Zrinjski |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Cliftonville |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 40 |
Legia Warszawa |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 41 |
Copenhagen |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 42 |
Spartak Trnava |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 43 |
Drita |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
DAC |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 45 |
Finalist 1 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Vitória Guimarães |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 47 |
Brøndby |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
AEK Larnaca |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Paphos |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 50 |
Paksi SE |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Cercle Brugge |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 2 |
Panevėžys |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Caernarfon Town |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 4 |
Borac Banja Luka |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 5 |
Hirnyk |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Ilves |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 |
Paide |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 8 |
Tallinna Kalev |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 |
Atlètic Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Sabah |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
TransINVEST Vilnius |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Velež |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 14 |
Marsaxlokk |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 15 |
FA Šiauliai |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Vllaznia Shkodër |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 17 |
CFR Cluj |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Mornar |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 19 |
Shkendija |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Torpedo Kutaisi |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 21 |
FC Avan Academy |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 22 |
Isloch |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Sumqayıt |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Videoton |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 25 |
Neman Grodno |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
FC Urartu |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 27 |
Noah |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 28 |
Tirana |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 29 |
Hajduk Split |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Budućnost |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Śląsk Wrocław |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Maccabi Haifa |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 33 |
Vaduz |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 34 |
Cherno More |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Puskás |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 36 |
Breidablik |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 37 |
Valur |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 38 |
Zrinjski |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 39 |
Cliftonville |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Legia Warszawa |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 41 |
Copenhagen |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 42 |
Spartak Trnava |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 43 |
Drita |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
DAC |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Finalist 1 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Vitória Guimarães |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 47 |
Brøndby |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 48 |
AEK Larnaca |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Paphos |
8 | 6 | 75% |
| 50 |
Paksi SE |
3 | 2 | 67% |
TransINVEST Vilnius BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in TransINVEST Vilnius’s case, their BTTS statistics in the UEFA Europa Conference League 2024/2025 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on TransINVEST Vilnius in the competition:
- In 2 matches to date, TransINVEST Vilnius has scored and conceded in the same game 0 times
- In terms of percentage, TransINVEST Vilnius has had both teams score in 0% of their matches in Europa Conference League.
You can also see TransINVEST Vilnius’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.