Football statistics for Dantong Hantong
Team Info
Season
2023
Country
China
Competition
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 13 | 43% | 33% | 53% |
| 2 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 14 | 47% | 60% | 33% |
| 3 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 15 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 4 |  Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% |
| 5 |  Shenyang Urban | 30 | 11 | 37% | 33% | 40% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% |
| 7 |  Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 8 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 13 | 43% | 33% | 53% |
| 9 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 12 | 40% | 47% | 33% |
| 10 |  Nanjing City | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 11 |  Dongguan United | 30 | 11 | 37% | 33% | 40% |
| 12 |  Yanbian Longding | 30 | 8 | 27% | 33% | 20% |
| 13 |  Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 17 | 57% | 33% | 80% |
| 14 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 15 |  Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 10 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 |  Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 23 | 77% | 80% | 73% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 26 | 87% | 93% | 80% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 26 | 87% | 93% | 80% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 24 | 80% | 87% | 73% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 27 | 90% | 80% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 21 | 70% | 80% | 60% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 25 | 83% | 87% | 80% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 21 | 70% | 93% | 47% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 19 | 63% | 53% | 73% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 22 | 73% | 87% | 60% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 18 | 60% | 53% | 67% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 20 | 67% | 60% | 73% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 20 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 22 | 73% | 60% | 87% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 20 | 67% | 73% | 60% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 22 | 73% | 73% | 73% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 20 | 67% | 60% | 73% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 6 | 20% | 7% | 33% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 7 | 23% | 40% | 7% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 8 | 27% | 27% | 27% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 8 | 27% | 13% | 40% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 13% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 5 | 17% | 7% | 27% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 5 | 17% | 27% | 7% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 3 | 10% | 20% | 0% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 6 | 20% | 27% | 13% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 9 | 30% | 7% | 53% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 5 | 17% | 7% | 27% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 3 | 10% | 20% | 0% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 4 | 13% | 20% | 7% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 3 | 10% | 0% | 20% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 17 | 57% | 67% | 47% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 16 | 53% | 40% | 67% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 15 | 50% | 47% | 53% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 19 | 63% | 60% | 67% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 19 | 63% | 67% | 60% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 19 | 63% | 60% | 67% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 17 | 57% | 67% | 47% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 18 | 60% | 53% | 67% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 19 | 63% | 67% | 60% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 22 | 73% | 67% | 80% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 13 | 43% | 67% | 20% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 20 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 19 | 63% | 60% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 7 | 23% | 20% | 27% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 6 | 20% | 13% | 27% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 3 | 10% | 20% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 9 | 30% | 20% | 40% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 20% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 9 | 30% | 7% | 53% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 11 | 37% | 47% | 27% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 8 | 27% | 13% | 40% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 12 | 40% | 47% | 33% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 10 | 33% | 40% | 27% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 10 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 8 | 27% | 40% | 13% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 10 | 33% | 27% | 40% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 8 | 27% | 27% | 27% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 10 | 33% | 40% | 27% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 24 | 80% | 93% | 67% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 23 | 77% | 60% | 93% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 22 | 73% | 73% | 73% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 22 | 73% | 87% | 60% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 25 | 83% | 80% | 87% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 25 | 83% | 93% | 73% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 25 | 83% | 73% | 93% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 27 | 90% | 80% | 100% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 24 | 80% | 73% | 87% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 21 | 70% | 93% | 47% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 26 | 87% | 87% | 87% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 25 | 83% | 93% | 73% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 27 | 90% | 80% | 100% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 26 | 87% | 80% | 93% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 27 | 90% | 100% | 80% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 26 | 87% | 93% | 80% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 2 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 4 | Guangxi Baoyun | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | Shenyang Urban | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | Dantong Hantong | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | Shanghai Jiading | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 8 | Suzhou Dongwu | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 12 | Yanbian Longding | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | Wuxi Wugou | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 14 | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | Jinan Xingzhou | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
Average goals scored and conceded: Dantong Hantong
Knowing Dantong Hantong’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the China League One 2023 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the Dantong Hantong’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
- 37% of Dantong Hantong games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Dantong Hantong and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 63%.
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in China League One.
All of this information can help determine how Dantong Hantong’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.