Season
Country
2025
China
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
29 | 48% | 34% | 17% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
29 | 48% | 34% | 10% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
29 | 55% | 45% | 28% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
29 | 48% | 28% | 17% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
29 | 48% | 34% | 21% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
29 | 38% | 21% | 7% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
29 | 55% | 41% | 24% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
29 | 59% | 45% | 21% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
29 | 66% | 55% | 17% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
29 | 48% | 34% | 10% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
29 | 66% | 38% | 24% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
29 | 52% | 34% | 24% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
29 | 55% | 41% | 21% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
29 | 59% | 34% | 17% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
29 | 52% | 34% | 14% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
29 | 72% | 38% | 10% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
29 | 45% | 17% | 0% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
29 | 52% | 24% | 3% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
29 | 55% | 34% | 17% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
29 | 45% | 21% | 7% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
29 | 62% | 45% | 14% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
29 | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
29 | 69% | 38% | 21% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
29 | 48% | 28% | 10% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
29 | 83% | 41% | 17% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
29 | 52% | 24% | 17% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
29 | 66% | 41% | 10% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
29 | 41% | 24% | 17% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
29 | 41% | 31% | 3% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
29 | 62% | 34% | 17% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
29 | 55% | 21% | 10% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
29 | 69% | 38% | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
29 | 55% | 38% | 17% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
29 | 55% | 24% | 3% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
29 | 59% | 24% | 10% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
29 | 52% | 24% | 7% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
29 | 34% | 21% | 3% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
29 | 41% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
29 | 62% | 34% | 7% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
29 | 69% | 38% | 28% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
29 | 48% | 28% | 10% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
29 | 45% | 24% | 7% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
29 | 55% | 45% | 14% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
29 | 59% | 38% | 21% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
29 | 72% | 45% | 28% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
29 | 59% | 31% | 3% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
29 | 62% | 24% | 14% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
29 | 66% | 24% | 7% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Dalian Huayi’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 45% of their games played so far in the China League One 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, Dalian Huayi’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 34% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Dalian Huayi this season in the China League 1:
You can follow the Dalian Huayi’s card situation in Chinese Division 1 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.