Season
Country
2025
USA
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
23 | 61% | 48% | 39% |
2 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
23 | 65% | 39% | 30% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
22 | 73% | 59% | 27% |
4 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
23 | 65% | 61% | 43% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
23 | 87% | 74% | 35% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
23 | 83% | 65% | 52% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
23 | 43% | 35% | 22% |
8 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
22 | 73% | 55% | 50% |
9 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
23 | 78% | 48% | 26% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
22 | 77% | 50% | 32% |
11 |
![]() Louisville City |
23 | 70% | 61% | 26% |
12 |
![]() Orange County |
22 | 82% | 68% | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
22 | 91% | 82% | 55% |
14 |
![]() New Mexico United |
22 | 73% | 68% | 45% |
15 |
![]() Loudoun United |
23 | 87% | 70% | 52% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
23 | 70% | 57% | 39% |
17 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
23 | 70% | 57% | 39% |
18 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
23 | 91% | 78% | 61% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
23 | 65% | 57% | 35% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
24 | 67% | 54% | 50% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
22 | 77% | 59% | 50% |
22 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
24 | 79% | 58% | 42% |
23 |
![]() Lexington |
24 | 63% | 42% | 29% |
24 |
![]() Rhode Island |
23 | 83% | 61% | 43% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
23 | 74% | 39% | 22% |
2 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
23 | 65% | 43% | 9% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
22 | 73% | 59% | 27% |
4 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
23 | 74% | 35% | 22% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
23 | 83% | 65% | 39% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
23 | 74% | 61% | 30% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
23 | 57% | 26% | 22% |
8 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
22 | 73% | 55% | 23% |
9 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
23 | 70% | 35% | 9% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
22 | 59% | 50% | 32% |
11 |
![]() Louisville City |
23 | 65% | 26% | 13% |
12 |
![]() Orange County |
22 | 77% | 45% | 23% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
22 | 73% | 68% | 41% |
14 |
![]() New Mexico United |
22 | 68% | 59% | 36% |
15 |
![]() Loudoun United |
23 | 78% | 43% | 26% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
23 | 52% | 43% | 30% |
17 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
23 | 78% | 65% | 39% |
18 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
23 | 70% | 52% | 39% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
23 | 78% | 52% | 43% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
24 | 54% | 29% | 4% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
22 | 77% | 45% | 27% |
22 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
24 | 67% | 46% | 17% |
23 |
![]() Lexington |
24 | 63% | 42% | 21% |
24 |
![]() Rhode Island |
23 | 74% | 48% | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
23 | 78% | 39% | 13% |
2 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
23 | 61% | 30% | 17% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
22 | 68% | 41% | 23% |
4 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
23 | 70% | 52% | 26% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
23 | 57% | 35% | 17% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
23 | 70% | 57% | 43% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
23 | 43% | 26% | 13% |
8 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
22 | 73% | 41% | 23% |
9 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
23 | 70% | 52% | 13% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
22 | 64% | 36% | 23% |
11 |
![]() Louisville City |
23 | 70% | 57% | 26% |
12 |
![]() Orange County |
22 | 91% | 64% | 41% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
22 | 86% | 64% | 36% |
14 |
![]() New Mexico United |
22 | 68% | 50% | 32% |
15 |
![]() Loudoun United |
23 | 87% | 61% | 39% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
23 | 65% | 52% | 26% |
17 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
23 | 48% | 30% | 4% |
18 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
23 | 83% | 74% | 61% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
23 | 57% | 22% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
24 | 83% | 63% | 38% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
22 | 77% | 45% | 36% |
22 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
24 | 63% | 54% | 29% |
23 |
![]() Lexington |
24 | 67% | 25% | 17% |
24 |
![]() Rhode Island |
23 | 78% | 61% | 26% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Colorado Springs’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 50% of their games played so far in the USL Championship 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, Colorado Springs’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 64% of their USL Championship matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Colorado Springs this season in the USL Championship:
You can follow the Colorado Springs’s card situation in USL Championship all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.