Season
2022/23
Country
Argentina
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() América Gen. San Martín |
14 | 29% | 21% | 21% |
2 |
![]() Deportivo Qom |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
3 |
![]() Barrio Adela |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Deportivo Roca |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() CAI |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Alianza Cutral Có |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Ferro Carril Sud |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Villa Balnearia |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Argentino Pergamino |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
10 |
![]() Fontana |
6 | 33% | 33% | 17% |
11 |
![]() Libertad San Carlos |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Atlético Policial |
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% |
13 |
![]() All Boys Santa Rosa |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Estudiantes Olavarría |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Michel |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Comercio |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
17 |
![]() Trinidad San Juan |
6 | 67% | 67% | 50% |
18 |
![]() Independiente S.Cayetano |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Racing Eduardo Castex |
10 | 30% | 30% | 30% |
20 |
![]() EFI Juniors |
8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 |
![]() San Martín Merlo |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
22 |
![]() Santa María de Oro |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Camioneros Ushuaia |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Deportivo Pinamar |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
25 |
![]() Ferrocarril del Estado |
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% |
26 |
![]() Deportivo Vicov |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Coronel Aguirre |
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% |
28 |
![]() Chacra 8 |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
29 |
![]() Argentino Chacabuco |
6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
30 |
![]() Viamonte |
8 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
31 |
![]() Sportivo Pringles |
6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
32 |
![]() Central Goya |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
33 |
![]() Peñaflor |
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Jorge Newbery CR |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() San Martín Mendoza |
13 | 62% | 62% | 62% |
36 |
![]() Belgrano Esquel |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Huracan Tres Arroyos |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
38 |
![]() Villa San Antonio |
8 | 25% | 25% | 13% |
39 |
![]() Sportivo Villa Quebrada |
8 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
40 |
![]() La Amistad |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 |
![]() Guaraní A. Franco |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() Deportivo Rincón |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 |
![]() Sportivo Cultural |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 |
![]() Graneros |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
45 |
![]() Huracán Ingeniero White |
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% |
46 |
![]() Los Andes Los Palacios |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() Deportiva Bowen |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 |
![]() Deportivo Gramilla |
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
49 |
![]() Talleres Nueva Esperanza |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 |
![]() Ferroviario Corrientes |
10 | 30% | 20% | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Huracán Chivilcoy |
10 | 60% | 50% | 40% |
2 |
![]() Atlético 9 de Julio |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Deportivo Verónica |
6 | 67% | 33% | 33% |
4 |
![]() SAT Moreno |
8 | 75% | 63% | 63% |
5 |
![]() Atlético Pedro Cano |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Deportivo Madariaga |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Atlético Pringles |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Deportivo Vicov |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Libertad Clorinda |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Barrio Adela |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Sarmiento de La Banda |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
12 |
![]() San Martín El Bañado |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
13 |
![]() Balonpié Bolívar |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Deportivo Malvinas |
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
15 |
![]() Barrio Argentino |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
16 |
![]() Estudiantes SdE |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
17 |
![]() Las Palmas |
6 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
18 |
![]() Juventud Alianza |
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% |
19 |
![]() Ferrocarril Roca |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Deportivo San Vicente |
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
21 |
![]() San Martín Rodeo |
6 | 33% | 33% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Ciudad de Nieva |
8 | 38% | 13% | 13% |
23 |
![]() Michel |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Defensores Vilelas |
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% |
25 |
![]() Belgrano Paraná |
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% |
26 |
![]() Pacífico |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Santa María de Oro |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() Camioneros Ushuaia |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Andino |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() 9 de Julio Morteros |
6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
31 |
![]() Deportivo Aberastain |
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
32 |
![]() Atlético Policial |
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% |
33 |
![]() Costa Brava |
6 | 50% | 17% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Acción Juvenil |
4 | 25% | 25% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Camioneros Argentinos |
15 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
36 |
![]() 9 Julio Rio Tercero |
4 | 50% | 25% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Petrolero Argentino |
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
38 |
![]() Independiente Fernández |
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Cruz del Sur |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Argentino Peñarol |
6 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
41 |
![]() La Picada |
8 | 38% | 25% | 13% |
42 |
![]() Atlético Chascomús |
6 | 83% | 33% | 17% |
43 |
![]() Central Larroque |
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% |
44 |
![]() Defensores de la Ribera |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
45 |
![]() Pedal |
10 | 20% | 10% | 0% |
46 |
![]() Mamerto Esquiú |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() 25 de Mayo Termas RH |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
48 |
![]() Independiente El Alto |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 |
![]() El Salado |
6 | 67% | 67% | 50% |
50 |
![]() Villa Balnearia |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Atlético River Plate |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Barrio Argentino |
8 | 13% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Defensores del Rosario |
4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() San Miguel San Juan |
10 | 50% | 30% | 10% |
5 |
![]() Viamonte |
8 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
6 |
![]() Atlético Uruguay |
14 | 36% | 21% | 7% |
7 |
![]() Patagones Viedma |
8 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
8 |
![]() Villa Belgrano Junin |
10 | 60% | 50% | 20% |
9 |
![]() Balonpié Bolívar |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Deportivo Malvinas |
6 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Deportivo Verónica |
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% |
12 |
![]() Deportivo San Vicente |
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Atlético Chascomús |
6 | 83% | 83% | 50% |
14 |
![]() Atlético Concarán |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() San Lorenzo M. Caseros |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Deportivo Nacional |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Williams Kemmis |
4 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Los Cachorros Salta |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Sportivo Suardi |
6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
20 |
![]() San Patricio |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Nocheros |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Unión Alicia |
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
23 |
![]() Pacífico |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Atlético Colón Junior |
6 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
25 |
![]() Ferroviario Corrientes |
10 | 30% | 30% | 20% |
26 |
![]() Unión Santiago |
10 | 40% | 30% | 30% |
27 |
![]() Sportivo Guzmán |
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% |
28 |
![]() Arsenal Viale |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Independiente S.Cayetano |
13 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() Las Mandarinas |
8 | 50% | 38% | 38% |
31 |
![]() San Lorenzo Villa Adela |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Parque Sur |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
33 |
![]() Central Larroque |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
34 |
![]() Huracán de Embarcación |
6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
35 |
![]() Huracán Corrientes |
6 | 67% | 50% | 17% |
36 |
![]() Cañadense |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
37 |
![]() Camioneros Argentinos |
15 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
38 |
![]() Sarmiento de La Banda |
10 | 30% | 30% | 10% |
39 |
![]() Juventud Pergamino |
8 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
40 |
![]() Villa Balnearia |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 |
![]() 9 de Julio Chacabuco |
6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() Sportivo Pringles |
6 | 33% | 33% | 17% |
43 |
![]() Villa Sanguinetti |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 |
![]() Paraná San Pedro |
6 | 83% | 83% | 67% |
45 |
![]() SEM Bragado |
6 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
46 |
![]() Sporting Punta Alta |
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% |
47 |
![]() San Lorenzo P. Deseado |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 |
![]() Alvear |
12 | 17% | 8% | 8% |
49 |
![]() La Picada |
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% |
50 |
![]() Huracán Chivilcoy |
10 | 50% | 40% | 30% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of 9 de Julio Chacabuco’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 33% of their games played so far in the Torneo Regional Federal Amateur 2022/2023.
And on the other side of the ball, 9 de Julio Chacabuco’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 33% of their Torneo Regional Federal Amateur matches.
Here are two more card statistics for 9 de Julio Chacabuco this season in the Torneo Regional Federal Amateur:
You can follow the 9 de Julio Chacabuco’s card situation in Torneo Regional Federal Amateur all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.