Season
Country
2025
Bolivia
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
1 | 50% |
2 |
![]() Real Potosí |
1 | 33% |
3 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 33% |
4 |
![]() San Juan |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() Guadalajara |
0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
9 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Fancesa |
0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Libertad |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Pucarani |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Olympic |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Real Potosí |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 50% |
4 |
![]() San Juan |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() Guadalajara |
0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
0 | 0% |
9 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Fancesa |
0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Libertad |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Pucarani |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Olympic |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() San Juan |
0 | 0% |
2 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
3 |
![]() Guadalajara |
0 | 0% |
4 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() Real Potosí |
0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() Fancesa |
0 | 0% |
9 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Libertad |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Pucarani |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Olympic |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
2 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Fancesa |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
2 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Guadalajara |
2 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
2 | 100% |
7 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
2 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Libertad |
2 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Pucarani |
2 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
2 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
2 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Olympic |
1 | 100% |
14 |
![]() Ingenio |
2 | 100% |
15 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
2 | 100% |
16 |
![]() Club Universitario |
2 | 100% |
17 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
1 | 100% |
18 |
![]() Chocorosi |
1 | 100% |
19 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
2 | 100% |
20 |
![]() San Juan |
2 | 100% |
21 |
![]() Real Potosí |
2 | 66% |
22 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
2 | 66% |
23 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
1 | 50% |
24 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Guadalajara |
1 | 100% |
5 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
2 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Libertad |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Pucarani |
1 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Olympic |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
1 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
1 | 100% |
14 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
1 | 100% |
15 |
![]() San Juan |
1 | 100% |
16 |
![]() Fancesa |
1 | 100% |
17 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Real Potosí |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Club Universitario |
2 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Guadalajara |
1 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
1 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Libertad |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Pucarani |
1 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Ingenio |
2 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
1 | 100% |
14 |
![]() Real Potosí |
2 | 100% |
15 |
![]() Chocorosi |
1 | 100% |
16 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
1 | 100% |
17 |
![]() San Juan |
1 | 100% |
18 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 100% |
19 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Fancesa |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Olympic |
0 | 0% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Municipal Tarija scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the Liga Nacional B 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Municipal Tarija is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the Liga Nacional B, Municipal Tarija has scored before the opponent in 0% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 100%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Municipal Tarija’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Municipal Tarija being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.