Chongqing Tongliang Long corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

2025

China

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Chongqing Tongliang Long	29	86 %	76 %	69 %	55 %	52 %	45 %	38 %	11.35
2	Guangzhou E-Power	29	90 %	90 %	72 %	41 %	31 %	31 %	28 %	10.96
3	Nanjing City	29	76 %	62 %	48 %	48 %	38 %	28 %	17 %	10.07
4	Shenzhen Juniors	29	72 %	69 %	48 %	45 %	24 %	14 %	7 %	9.76
5	Nantong Zhiyun	29	76 %	69 %	59 %	45 %	21 %	10 %	10 %	9.41
6	Shanghai Jiading	29	69 %	55 %	41 %	24 %	17 %	7 %	7 %	9.24
7	Qingdao Red Lions	29	69 %	59 %	48 %	28 %	24 %	14 %	7 %	9.17
8	Shenyang Urban	29	66 %	59 %	45 %	34 %	28 %	10 %	7 %	9.04
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	29	72 %	59 %	41 %	17 %	7 %	3 %	3 %	9
10	Shaanxi Union	29	72 %	52 %	48 %	28 %	17 %	14 %	10 %	8.89
11	Suzhou Dongwu	29	59 %	41 %	34 %	34 %	24 %	21 %	14 %	8.87
12	Dongguan United	29	59 %	48 %	41 %	28 %	21 %	7 %	7 %	8.62
13	Guangxi Baoyun	29	55 %	48 %	34 %	17 %	17 %	10 %	10 %	8.52
14	Dalian Huayi	29	52 %	45 %	28 %	17 %	17 %	10 %	10 %	7.83
15	Yanbian Longding	29	48 %	38 %	31 %	21 %	17 %	0 %	0 %	7.69
16	Hebei Kungfu	29	41 %	41 %	28 %	21 %	17 %	10 %	10 %	7.57

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	93 %	80 %	67 %	67 %	67 %	60 %	53 %	12.67
2	Guangzhou E-Power	14	93 %	93 %	79 %	57 %	43 %	43 %	36 %	11.64
3	Shenzhen Juniors	14	86 %	79 %	64 %	57 %	29 %	14 %	7 %	10.43
4	Suzhou Dongwu	14	57 %	57 %	50 %	50 %	36 %	29 %	21 %	9.86
5	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80 %	67 %	60 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.67
6	Shenyang Urban	14	71 %	64 %	50 %	43 %	36 %	7 %	7 %	9.5
7	Shaanxi Union	14	79 %	57 %	57 %	36 %	21 %	14 %	7 %	9.36
8	Nanjing City	15	67 %	47 %	40 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	9.2
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	73 %	47 %	40 %	13 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	9.08
10	Shanghai Jiading	14	64 %	64 %	43 %	14 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	8.78
11	Dongguan United	15	53 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	8.54
12	Qingdao Red Lions	15	67 %	60 %	47 %	20 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	8.4
13	Dalian Huayi	15	53 %	47 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	7.8
14	Yanbian Longding	14	43 %	36 %	29 %	7 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	7.14
15	Hebei Kungfu	14	43 %	43 %	29 %	21 %	14 %	7 %	7 %	7.07
16	Guangxi Baoyun	15	40 %	33 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.86

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Nanjing City	14	86 %	79 %	57 %	57 %	50 %	36 %	29 %	11
2	Guangzhou E-Power	15	87 %	87 %	67 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	10.33
3	Guangxi Baoyun	14	71 %	64 %	64 %	36 %	36 %	21 %	21 %	10.3
4	Qingdao Red Lions	14	71 %	57 %	50 %	36 %	36 %	29 %	14 %	10
5	Chongqing Tongliang Long	14	79 %	71 %	71 %	43 %	36 %	29 %	21 %	9.93
6	Shanghai Jiading	15	73 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.67
7	Nantong Zhiyun	14	71 %	71 %	57 %	50 %	21 %	7 %	7 %	9.14
8	Shenzhen Juniors	15	60 %	60 %	33 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	9.13
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	14	71 %	71 %	43 %	21 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.93
10	Dongguan United	14	64 %	57 %	50 %	29 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	8.71
11	Shenyang Urban	15	60 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	8.57
12	Shaanxi Union	15	67 %	47 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	8.47
13	Yanbian Longding	15	53 %	40 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	0 %	0 %	8.2
14	Hebei Kungfu	15	40 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	8.07
15	Suzhou Dongwu	15	60 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7.93
16	Dalian Huayi	14	50 %	43 %	29 %	21 %	21 %	7 %	7 %	7.86

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	29	93%	83%	76%	69%	55%	48%	41%	7.59
3	Guangzhou E-Power	29	90%	79%	72%	55%	41%	31%	14%	5.93
4	Shaanxi Union	29	83%	69%	55%	48%	41%	17%	10%	5.41
5	Suzhou Dongwu	29	90%	69%	52%	34%	31%	24%	21%	5.21
6	Nantong Zhiyun	29	83%	69%	55%	41%	28%	21%	14%	5.17
7	Shenyang Urban	29	79%	79%	66%	38%	21%	14%	10%	5.11
8	Qingdao Red Lions	29	76%	62%	59%	52%	31%	17%	0%	4.83
9	Nanjing City	29	76%	59%	45%	41%	28%	17%	7%	4.79
10	Shenzhen Juniors	29	76%	59%	41%	28%	7%	3%	3%	4.1
11	Guangxi Baoyun	29	72%	45%	34%	17%	10%	7%	7%	3.89
12	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	29	69%	48%	31%	17%	14%	7%	0%	3.81
13	Shanghai Jiading	29	66%	48%	41%	28%	14%	7%	7%	3.79
14	Dalian Huayi	29	66%	48%	31%	14%	7%	3%	3%	3.59
15	Yanbian Longding	29	69%	48%	38%	14%	10%	3%	0%	3.52
16	Hebei Kungfu	29	52%	45%	28%	21%	7%	0%	0%	3.32
17	Dongguan United	29	55%	41%	17%	10%	3%	0%	0%	2.86

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	100%	100%	100%	100%	80%	73%	67%	9.87
3	Guangzhou E-Power	14	93%	93%	86%	79%	57%	50%	21%	7
4	Suzhou Dongwu	14	93%	79%	64%	50%	50%	43%	36%	6.29
5	Shaanxi Union	14	100%	79%	64%	57%	50%	21%	7%	6.07
6	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80%	73%	67%	47%	40%	33%	27%	5.87
7	Shenyang Urban	14	86%	86%	86%	50%	29%	21%	14%	5.71
8	Qingdao Red Lions	15	73%	53%	53%	53%	40%	33%	0%	4.87
9	Nanjing City	15	67%	60%	53%	53%	33%	20%	0%	4.73
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	67%	60%	47%	20%	20%	13%	0%	4.62
11	Shenzhen Juniors	14	93%	64%	57%	29%	7%	0%	0%	4.5
12	Dalian Huayi	15	87%	60%	40%	20%	7%	7%	7%	4.27
13	Shanghai Jiading	14	71%	50%	43%	29%	14%	14%	14%	4.14
14	Guangxi Baoyun	15	80%	33%	33%	7%	7%	0%	0%	3.43
15	Hebei Kungfu	14	50%	50%	29%	29%	7%	0%	0%	3.43
16	Dongguan United	15	60%	47%	20%	13%	7%	0%	0%	3.07
17	Yanbian Longding	14	50%	36%	29%	14%	14%	7%	0%	3

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	14	86%	64%	50%	36%	29%	21%	14%	5.14
3	Guangzhou E-Power	15	87%	67%	60%	33%	27%	13%	7%	4.93
4	Nanjing City	14	86%	57%	36%	29%	21%	14%	14%	4.86
5	Shaanxi Union	15	67%	60%	47%	40%	33%	13%	13%	4.8
6	Qingdao Red Lions	14	79%	71%	64%	50%	21%	0%	0%	4.79
7	Shenyang Urban	15	73%	73%	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	4.5
8	Nantong Zhiyun	14	86%	64%	43%	36%	14%	7%	0%	4.43
9	Guangxi Baoyun	14	64%	57%	36%	29%	14%	14%	14%	4.38
10	Suzhou Dongwu	15	87%	60%	40%	20%	13%	7%	7%	4.2
11	Yanbian Longding	15	87%	60%	47%	13%	7%	0%	0%	4
12	Shenzhen Juniors	15	60%	53%	27%	27%	7%	7%	7%	3.73
13	Shanghai Jiading	15	60%	47%	40%	27%	13%	0%	0%	3.47
14	Hebei Kungfu	15	53%	40%	27%	13%	7%	0%	0%	3.21
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	14	71%	36%	14%	14%	7%	0%	0%	3.07
16	Dalian Huayi	14	43%	36%	21%	7%	7%	0%	0%	2.86
17	Dongguan United	14	50%	36%	14%	7%	0%	0%	0%	2.64

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Dongguan United	29	93%	83%	69%	52%	34%	24%	14%	5.76
3	Shenzhen Juniors	29	93%	86%	72%	45%	24%	21%	14%	5.66
4	Shanghai Jiading	29	97%	79%	72%	41%	31%	10%	7%	5.45
5	Nanjing City	29	86%	69%	52%	41%	34%	17%	10%	5.28
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	29	76%	62%	52%	45%	31%	24%	10%	5.19
7	Guangzhou E-Power	29	83%	79%	55%	38%	28%	17%	10%	5.03
8	Guangxi Baoyun	29	69%	55%	41%	34%	10%	10%	10%	4.63
9	Qingdao Red Lions	29	76%	52%	34%	28%	14%	14%	7%	4.34
10	Hebei Kungfu	29	72%	52%	34%	24%	21%	14%	7%	4.25
11	Nantong Zhiyun	29	69%	45%	38%	31%	21%	14%	14%	4.24
12	Dalian Huayi	29	72%	55%	38%	24%	17%	10%	7%	4.24
13	Yanbian Longding	29	72%	62%	45%	24%	21%	10%	7%	4.17
14	Shenyang Urban	29	59%	48%	41%	34%	17%	7%	3%	3.93
15	Chongqing Tongliang Long	29	55%	34%	31%	24%	17%	17%	14%	3.76
16	Suzhou Dongwu	29	52%	41%	34%	21%	17%	10%	3%	3.66
17	Shaanxi Union	29	69%	48%	31%	21%	10%	0%	0%	3.48

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenzhen Juniors	14	100%	93%	71%	57%	21%	21%	14%	5.93
3	Dongguan United	15	93%	73%	67%	40%	20%	13%	13%	5.47
4	Shanghai Jiading	14	93%	71%	64%	29%	14%	0%	0%	4.64
5	Guangzhou E-Power	14	86%	79%	36%	36%	21%	7%	7%	4.64
6	Nanjing City	15	80%	73%	47%	27%	27%	0%	0%	4.47
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	67%	60%	47%	33%	20%	7%	0%	4.46
8	Yanbian Longding	14	86%	64%	43%	14%	14%	7%	7%	4.14
9	Nantong Zhiyun	15	53%	33%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	3.8
10	Shenyang Urban	14	64%	50%	36%	36%	14%	0%	0%	3.79
11	Hebei Kungfu	14	64%	43%	29%	21%	14%	7%	7%	3.64
12	Suzhou Dongwu	14	50%	43%	29%	21%	14%	7%	0%	3.57
13	Dalian Huayi	15	60%	53%	33%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.53
14	Qingdao Red Lions	15	73%	40%	13%	13%	7%	7%	7%	3.53
15	Guangxi Baoyun	15	60%	40%	27%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.43
16	Shaanxi Union	14	57%	50%	29%	21%	14%	0%	0%	3.29
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	53%	20%	13%	7%	7%	7%	7%	2.8

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Jiading	15	100%	87%	80%	53%	47%	20%	13%	6.2
3	Nanjing City	14	93%	64%	57%	57%	43%	36%	21%	6.14
4	Dongguan United	14	93%	93%	71%	64%	50%	36%	14%	6.07
5	Guangxi Baoyun	14	79%	71%	57%	50%	21%	21%	21%	5.92
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	14	86%	64%	57%	57%	43%	43%	21%	5.86
7	Shenzhen Juniors	15	87%	80%	73%	33%	27%	20%	13%	5.4
8	Guangzhou E-Power	15	80%	80%	73%	40%	33%	27%	13%	5.4
9	Qingdao Red Lions	14	79%	64%	57%	43%	21%	21%	7%	5.21
10	Dalian Huayi	14	86%	57%	43%	43%	29%	14%	7%	5
11	Hebei Kungfu	15	80%	60%	40%	27%	27%	20%	7%	4.86
12	Chongqing Tongliang Long	14	57%	50%	50%	43%	29%	29%	21%	4.79
13	Nantong Zhiyun	14	86%	57%	43%	36%	21%	14%	14%	4.71
14	Yanbian Longding	15	60%	60%	47%	33%	27%	13%	7%	4.2
15	Shenyang Urban	15	53%	47%	47%	33%	20%	13%	7%	4.07
16	Suzhou Dongwu	15	53%	40%	40%	20%	20%	13%	7%	3.73
17	Shaanxi Union	15	80%	47%	33%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.67

Chongqing Tongliang Long corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Chongqing Tongliang Long’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the China League 1:

Chongqing Tongliang Long games have an average of 11.35 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
69% of Chongqing Tongliang Long’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Chongqing Tongliang Long has an average of 7.59 corners won per game this season.
On 69% of occasions, Chongqing Tongliang Long had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Chongqing Tongliang Long usually concedes an average of 3.76 corners per match.

You can also check out Chongqing Tongliang Long’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.