Chongqing Dangdai Lifan corners per game
Team Info
Season
Country
Venue
2021
China
Chongqing Olympic Sports Center
Competition
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen
|
22 | 82 % | 73 % | 59 % | 45 % | 36 % | 27 % | 14 % | 10.81 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
22 | 86 % | 68 % | 59 % | 50 % | 32 % | 18 % | 9 % | 10.43 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
22 | 64 % | 59 % | 55 % | 45 % | 36 % | 27 % | 14 % | 9.91 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
22 | 73 % | 59 % | 50 % | 50 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9.9 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC
|
22 | 64 % | 59 % | 59 % | 41 % | 36 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9.81 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
22 | 68 % | 59 % | 55 % | 45 % | 14 % | 14 % | 9 % | 9.52 |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng
|
22 | 77 % | 68 % | 50 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 9.33 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang
|
22 | 64 % | 55 % | 41 % | 32 % | 18 % | 14 % | 9 % | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai
|
22 | 64 % | 59 % | 50 % | 41 % | 18 % | 5 % | 5 % | 9.14 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
22 | 55 % | 50 % | 45 % | 36 % | 27 % | 14 % | 0 % | 9 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
22 | 68 % | 59 % | 41 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 5 % | 8.9 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
22 | 64 % | 50 % | 27 % | 23 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9 % | 8.68 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda
|
22 | 68 % | 55 % | 36 % | 18 % | 5 % | 5 % | 5 % | 8.66 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
22 | 50 % | 36 % | 27 % | 23 % | 18 % | 5 % | 5 % | 8.4 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
22 | 55 % | 41 % | 36 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 8.34 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
22 | 45 % | 41 % | 27 % | 14 % | 5 % | 0 % | 0 % | 7.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 82 % | 73 % | 55 % | 45 % | 27 % | 27 % | 9 % | 11.1 |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 82 % | 82 % | 82 % | 55 % | 45 % | 36 % | 27 % | 11 |
| 3 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 73 % | 73 % | 73 % | 73 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 10.45 |
| 4 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 73 % | 64 % | 55 % | 45 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 10.2 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 64 % | 55 % | 55 % | 45 % | 45 % | 36 % | 18 % | 10 |
| 6 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64 % | 55 % | 55 % | 45 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9.4 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 55 % | 55 % | 55 % | 36 % | 27 % | 0 % | 0 % | 9.34 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 64 % | 55 % | 36 % | 36 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 73 % | 64 % | 45 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 8.73 |
| 10 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 64 % | 45 % | 27 % | 27 % | 18 % | 0 % | 0 % | 8.7 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 73 % | 55 % | 27 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 0 % | 8.64 |
| 12 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 55 % | 45 % | 36 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 8.63 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 45 % | 36 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9 % | 8.2 |
| 14 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 55 % | 36 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9 % | 8.09 |
| 15 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 73 % | 45 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 8 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 55 % | 55 % | 27 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 7.91 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 91 % | 82 % | 73 % | 64 % | 18 % | 18 % | 9 % | 10.73 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 100 % | 73 % | 64 % | 55 % | 36 % | 18 % | 9 % | 10.64 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 82 % | 73 % | 64 % | 45 % | 45 % | 27 % | 18 % | 10.55 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82 % | 73 % | 55 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 10 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 64 % | 64 % | 55 % | 45 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9.82 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 64 % | 64 % | 45 % | 27 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9.4 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 73 % | 45 % | 27 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9.3 |
| 8 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 73 % | 64 % | 27 % | 27 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 64 % | 64 % | 55 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9 % | 9.18 |
| 10 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 64 % | 55 % | 45 % | 27 % | 18 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9.1 |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64 % | 64 % | 45 % | 36 % | 18 % | 0 % | 0 % | 8.91 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 55 % | 45 % | 36 % | 36 % | 27 % | 27 % | 0 % | 8.73 |
| 13 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 45 % | 36 % | 36 % | 27 % | 27 % | 18 % | 9 % | 8.5 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 36 % | 27 % | 27 % | 18 % | 18 % | 9 % | 9 % | 8.1 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 55 % | 36 % | 36 % | 36 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 8 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 36 % | 27 % | 27 % | 27 % | 9 % | 0 % | 0 % | 7.09 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shenzhen
|
22 | 91% | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 7.19 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
22 | 95% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 6.95 |
| 4 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
22 | 86% | 82% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.9 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng
|
22 | 77% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 9% | 5.71 |
| 6 |
Dalian Yifang
|
22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.38 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.14 |
| 8 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
22 | 73% | 68% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 4.86 |
| 9 |
Tianjin Teda
|
22 | 59% | 50% | 45% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 4.14 |
| 10 |
Hebei CFFC
|
22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
22 | 77% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 5% | 3.95 |
| 12 |
Changchun Yatai
|
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
22 | 50% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.57 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
22 | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 15 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
22 | 59% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 16 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
22 | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.32 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
22 | 50% | 36% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.23 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 7.9 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 6.8 |
| 4 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5.67 |
| 5 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 8 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.18 |
| 9 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 91% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.64 |
| 10 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 11 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 14 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 16 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.2 |
| 17 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.3 |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 6 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 8 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 9 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.4 |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 11 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 12 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 13 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 15 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| 17 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
22 | 95% | 86% | 77% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 6.68 |
| 3 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 64% | 36% | 23% | 23% | 5.95 |
| 4 |
Hebei CFFC
|
22 | 91% | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai
|
22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.38 |
| 6 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
22 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.36 |
| 7 |
Henan Jianye
|
22 | 64% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall
|
22 | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan
|
22 | 77% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 4.76 |
| 10 |
Tianjin Teda
|
22 | 77% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 4.52 |
| 11 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
22 | 82% | 64% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 12 |
Dalian Yifang
|
22 | 55% | 45% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.81 |
| 13 |
Shandong Luneng
|
22 | 68% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen
|
22 | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
22 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 3.48 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
22 | 59% | 32% | 32% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.48 |
| 17 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
22 | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 3.1 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.64 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.1 |
| 4 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 6 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 7 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 8 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 10 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.67 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 16 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.36 |
| 17 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Qingdao Huanghai
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 7.27 |
| 3 |
Guangzhou R&F
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.82 |
| 4 |
Wuhan Zall
|
11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 5.91 |
| 5 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 6 |
Henan Jianye
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 7 |
Tianjin Teda
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 9 |
Hebei CFFC
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 10 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 11 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 12 |
Dalian Yifang
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
11 | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.55 |
| 17 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan corner statistics
The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.
Here are the Chongqing Dangdai Lifan’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Liga China:
- Chongqing Dangdai Lifan games have an average of 8.68 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
- 27% of Chongqing Dangdai Lifan’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
- Chongqing Dangdai Lifan has an average of 3.32 corners won per game this season.
- On 18% of occasions, Chongqing Dangdai Lifan had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
- Regarding corners given up, Chongqing Dangdai Lifan usually concedes an average of 5.36 corners per match.
You can also check out Chongqing Dangdai Lifan’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.
And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.