Football statistics for Ceres
Team Info
Season
2022
Country
Asia
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City FC |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 3 |
Sydney FC |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 4 |
Melbourne Victory FC |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
6 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 8 |
Yokohama F. Marinos |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 9 |
Urawa Reds |
9 | 2 | 22% |
| 10 |
Vissel Kobe |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 11 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 15 |
Buriram United |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 16 |
Kitchee |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 17 |
Home United |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 18 |
Ceres |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 19 |
Kaya |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Daegu |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
9 | 6 | 67% |
| 23 |
Jeonnam Dragons |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 24 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 25 |
Al Duhail |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 26 |
Al Gharafa |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 27 |
Al Rayyan |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 28 |
Al Sadd |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
6 | 6 | 100% |
| 30 |
Al Jazira |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 31 |
Al Sharjah |
7 | 6 | 86% |
| 32 |
Bani Yas |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 34 |
Al Shabab |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 35 |
Al Faisaly |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 36 |
Al Taawon |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 37 |
Mumbai City |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 38 |
Al Wihdat |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 39 |
Pakhtakor |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 40 |
Nasaf |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 41 |
Foolad |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 42 |
Sepahan |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 43 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 44 |
Istiqlol |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 45 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 46 |
Al Jaish |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 47 |
Ahal |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City FC |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 3 |
Sydney FC |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 4 |
Melbourne Victory FC |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Yokohama F. Marinos |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Urawa Reds |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Vissel Kobe |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 11 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Buriram United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Kitchee |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 17 |
Home United |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 18 |
Ceres |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 19 |
Kaya |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Daegu |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 23 |
Jeonnam Dragons |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 24 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 25 |
Al Duhail |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 26 |
Al Gharafa |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 27 |
Al Rayyan |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 28 |
Al Sadd |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 30 |
Al Jazira |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 31 |
Al Sharjah |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 32 |
Bani Yas |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 34 |
Al Shabab |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Al Faisaly |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 36 |
Al Taawon |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 37 |
Mumbai City |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Al Wihdat |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 39 |
Pakhtakor |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 40 |
Nasaf |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 41 |
Foolad |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 42 |
Sepahan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 43 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 44 |
Istiqlol |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 45 |
Al Zawra'a |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Al Jaish |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Ahal |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City FC |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 3 |
Sydney FC |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Melbourne Victory FC |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 8 |
Yokohama F. Marinos |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 9 |
Urawa Reds |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 10 |
Vissel Kobe |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 11 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Buriram United |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 16 |
Kitchee |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 17 |
Home United |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Ceres |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Kaya |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Daegu |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 23 |
Jeonnam Dragons |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 24 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 25 |
Al Duhail |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 26 |
Al Gharafa |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Rayyan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 28 |
Al Sadd |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 30 |
Al Jazira |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 31 |
Al Sharjah |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 32 |
Bani Yas |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 34 |
Al Shabab |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 35 |
Al Faisaly |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 36 |
Al Taawon |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 37 |
Mumbai City |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 38 |
Al Wihdat |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 39 |
Pakhtakor |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 40 |
Nasaf |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 41 |
Foolad |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 42 |
Sepahan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 43 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
Istiqlol |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 45 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 46 |
Al Jaish |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 47 |
Ahal |
3 | 1 | 33% |
Ceres BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Ceres’s case, their BTTS statistics in the AFC Champions League 2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Ceres in the competition:
- In 6 matches to date, Ceres has scored and conceded in the same game 1 times
- In terms of percentage, Ceres has had both teams score in 17% of their matches in AFC Champions League.
You can also see Ceres’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.