Season
Country
2025
Bolivia
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
2 | 50% |
2 |
![]() Fancesa |
1 | 33% |
3 |
![]() Ingenieros |
1 | 33% |
4 |
![]() Guadalajara |
1 | 25% |
5 |
![]() Olympic |
1 | 25% |
6 |
![]() Libertad |
1 | 20% |
7 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
1 | 20% |
8 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
1 | 20% |
9 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 20% |
10 |
![]() Real Potosí |
1 | 20% |
11 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Pucarani |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() San Juan |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Ingenieros |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
2 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
1 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Real Potosí |
1 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Fancesa |
1 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
1 | 33% |
8 |
![]() Libertad |
1 | 33% |
9 |
![]() Olympic |
1 | 33% |
10 |
![]() Guadalajara |
1 | 33% |
11 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Pucarani |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() San Juan |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
0 | 0% |
2 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
0 | 0% |
3 |
![]() Pucarani |
0 | 0% |
4 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() Olympic |
0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() Ingenio |
0 | 0% |
9 |
![]() Libertad |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Chocorosi |
0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() San Juan |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Fancesa |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Club Universitario |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Guadalajara |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Real Potosí |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Club Universitario |
5 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
4 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Pucarani |
4 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
5 | 100% |
5 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
5 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
4 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
5 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
4 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
4 | 100% |
10 |
![]() San Juan |
4 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
4 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Chocorosi |
3 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
4 | 100% |
14 |
![]() Ingenio |
4 | 100% |
15 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
4 | 80% |
16 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
4 | 80% |
17 |
![]() Real Potosí |
4 | 80% |
18 |
![]() Libertad |
4 | 80% |
19 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
4 | 80% |
20 |
![]() Guadalajara |
3 | 75% |
21 |
![]() Olympic |
3 | 75% |
22 |
![]() Ingenieros |
2 | 66% |
23 |
![]() Fancesa |
2 | 66% |
24 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
2 | 50% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
3 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Club Universitario |
2 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Ingenio |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
3 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
2 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Pucarani |
2 | 100% |
7 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
3 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
2 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
2 | 100% |
12 |
![]() San Juan |
1 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
3 | 100% |
14 |
![]() Chocorosi |
1 | 100% |
15 |
![]() Olympic |
2 | 66% |
16 |
![]() Libertad |
2 | 66% |
17 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
2 | 66% |
18 |
![]() Guadalajara |
2 | 66% |
19 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
1 | 50% |
20 |
![]() Real Potosí |
1 | 50% |
21 |
![]() Fancesa |
1 | 50% |
22 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
1 | 50% |
23 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
1 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Ingenieros |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Municipal Tarija |
3 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Nacional Sucre |
2 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Club Universitario |
3 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Libertad |
2 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Ingenio |
3 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Olympic |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Municipal Tiquipaya |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Pucarani |
2 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Deportivo Shalon |
3 | 100% |
10 |
![]() 3 de Febrero |
2 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz |
3 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Río San Juan Humi |
1 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Nueva Cliza |
3 | 100% |
14 |
![]() Primero Mayo |
3 | 100% |
15 |
![]() Real Potosí |
3 | 100% |
16 |
![]() Universitario Pando |
2 | 100% |
17 |
![]() Guadalajara |
1 | 100% |
18 |
![]() Fancesa |
1 | 100% |
19 |
![]() Ingenieros |
2 | 100% |
20 |
![]() Universitario Tarija |
2 | 100% |
21 |
![]() San Juan |
3 | 100% |
22 |
![]() Chaco Petrolero |
1 | 100% |
23 |
![]() Chocorosi |
2 | 100% |
24 |
![]() Torre Fuerte |
2 | 100% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which 3 de Febrero scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the Liga Nacional B 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether 3 de Febrero is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the Liga Nacional B, 3 de Febrero has scored before the opponent in 0% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 100%.
This data helps give a clearer view of 3 de Febrero’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to 3 de Febrero being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.