# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michigan Stars | 2 | 100% |
2 | Maryland Bobcats | 1 | 100% |
3 | Irvine Zeta | 2 | 100% |
4 | LA Force | 2 | 50% |
5 | Georgia Lions | 2 | 50% |
6 | Capo | 2 | 50% |
7 | Savannah Clovers | 3 | 33% |
8 | Club De Lyon | 2 | 0% |
9 | Arizona Monsoon | 2 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michigan Stars | 2 | 100% |
2 | Capo | 1 | 100% |
3 | Georgia Lions | 1 | 100% |
4 | Irvine Zeta | 1 | 100% |
5 | LA Force | 2 | 50% |
6 | Savannah Clovers | 1 | 0% |
7 | Maryland Bobcats | 0 | 0% |
8 | Club De Lyon | 1 | 0% |
9 | Arizona Monsoon | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Maryland Bobcats | 1 | 100% |
2 | Irvine Zeta | 1 | 100% |
3 | Savannah Clovers | 2 | 50% |
4 | Michigan Stars | 0 | 0% |
5 | Georgia Lions | 1 | 0% |
6 | LA Force | 0 | 0% |
7 | Club De Lyon | 1 | 0% |
8 | Arizona Monsoon | 2 | 0% |
9 | Capo | 1 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Club De Lyon | 2 | 100% |
2 | Arizona Monsoon | 2 | 100% |
3 | Savannah Clovers | 3 | 67% |
4 | LA Force | 2 | 50% |
5 | Georgia Lions | 2 | 50% |
6 | Capo | 2 | 50% |
7 | Michigan Stars | 2 | 0% |
8 | Maryland Bobcats | 1 | 0% |
9 | Irvine Zeta | 2 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Club De Lyon | 1 | 100% |
2 | Savannah Clovers | 1 | 100% |
3 | LA Force | 2 | 50% |
4 | Michigan Stars | 2 | 0% |
5 | Georgia Lions | 1 | 0% |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 0 | 0% |
7 | Arizona Monsoon | 0 | 0% |
8 | Capo | 1 | 0% |
9 | Irvine Zeta | 1 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Club De Lyon | 1 | 100% |
2 | Capo | 1 | 100% |
3 | Georgia Lions | 1 | 100% |
4 | Arizona Monsoon | 2 | 100% |
5 | Savannah Clovers | 2 | 50% |
6 | Irvine Zeta | 1 | 0% |
7 | Michigan Stars | 0 | 0% |
8 | LA Force | 0 | 0% |
9 | Maryland Bobcats | 1 | 0% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Capo scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the NISA 2024.
Through this stat, we can see whether Capo is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the NISA, Capo has scored before the opponent in 50% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 50%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Capo’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Capo being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.