Bustese Milano City FC SSD Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

2019/20

Italy

Competition

Italy

Serie D Group B

Summary Matches Corners Stats

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	27	37%	30%	30%	30%	19%	15%	7%	11.45
2	Brusaporto	27	22%	22%	19%	11%	7%	7%	7%	11.29
3	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	27	30%	26%	26%	22%	15%	11%	7%	10.7
4	Levico	27	19%	19%	19%	15%	4%	4%	4%	10.67
5	Sondrio	27	7%	7%	7%	4%	0%	0%	0%	10.5
6	Pontisola	27	33%	26%	22%	19%	19%	19%	11%	10.42
7	Nibionnoggiono	27	19%	19%	11%	11%	7%	7%	4%	10.34
8	Scanzorosciate	27	19%	15%	15%	11%	11%	7%	4%	10.01
9	Folgore Caratese	27	30%	30%	22%	15%	11%	11%	0%	9.7
10	Dro Alto Garda	27	15%	11%	7%	4%	0%	0%	0%	9.5
11	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	27	26%	26%	19%	11%	11%	11%	11%	9.5
12	Villa Valle	27	11%	11%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	9.2
13	Inveruno	27	26%	19%	15%	15%	7%	7%	4%	9.1
14	Virtus Bolzano	27	19%	11%	7%	7%	4%	4%	0%	9
15	Castellanzese	27	11%	11%	11%	11%	4%	4%	0%	9
16	Legnano	27	26%	22%	19%	7%	4%	4%	4%	8.63
17	Arconatese	27	15%	15%	15%	7%	4%	4%	4%	8.5
18	Tritium	27	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	4%	4%	8.2
19	Pro Sesto	27	41%	33%	30%	15%	7%	7%	4%	7.94
20	Seregno	27	11%	4%	4%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6.44

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	13	31%	31%	31%	31%	15%	15%	8%	11.4
2	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	14	29%	21%	21%	21%	14%	7%	0%	11
3	Levico	13	8%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	0%	11
4	Scanzorosciate	13	23%	15%	15%	15%	15%	8%	8%	11
5	Brusaporto	14	29%	29%	29%	14%	7%	7%	7%	10.6
6	Villa Valle	14	21%	21%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	10.5
7	Pontisola	13	46%	38%	38%	31%	31%	31%	15%	10.44
8	Arconatese	14	21%	21%	21%	7%	0%	0%	0%	10.33
9	Virtus Bolzano	14	14%	14%	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	10
10	Castellanzese	13	23%	23%	23%	23%	8%	8%	0%	10
11	Inveruno	13	31%	23%	23%	23%	15%	15%	8%	9.66
12	Folgore Caratese	13	38%	38%	23%	8%	8%	8%	0%	9.5
13	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	13	23%	23%	23%	15%	15%	15%	15%	9.2
14	Legnano	14	29%	21%	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	8.33
15	Pro Sesto	13	46%	31%	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	7.9
16	Nibionnoggiono	13	8%	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7
17	Seregno	14	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6
18	Tritium	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
19	Sondrio	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0
20	Dro Alto Garda	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Brusaporto	13	15%	15%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	13
2	Nibionnoggiono	14	29%	29%	21%	21%	14%	14%	7%	12
3	Caravaggio	14	43%	29%	29%	29%	21%	14%	7%	11.5
4	Tritium	13	15%	15%	15%	15%	15%	8%	8%	11
5	Levico	14	29%	29%	29%	21%	7%	7%	7%	10.6
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	13	31%	31%	31%	23%	15%	15%	15%	10.5
7	Sondrio	13	15%	15%	15%	8%	0%	0%	0%	10.5
8	Pontisola	14	21%	14%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	10.33
9	Folgore Caratese	14	21%	21%	21%	21%	14%	14%	0%	10
10	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	14	29%	29%	14%	7%	7%	7%	7%	9.8
11	Dro Alto Garda	13	31%	23%	15%	8%	0%	0%	0%	9.5
12	Scanzorosciate	14	14%	14%	14%	7%	7%	7%	0%	9
13	Legnano	13	23%	23%	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	9
14	Virtus Bolzano	13	23%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	0%	8.6
15	Inveruno	14	21%	14%	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	8.25
16	Pro Sesto	14	36%	36%	36%	14%	7%	7%	0%	8
17	Arconatese	13	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	7.4
18	Seregno	13	15%	8%	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6.8
19	Castellanzese	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	5
20	Villa Valle	13	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Nibionnoggiono	27	22%	22%	19%	15%	11%	4%	4%	6.67
3	Sondrio	27	7%	7%	7%	7%	4%	0%	0%	6.5
4	Pontisola	27	41%	41%	37%	26%	15%	11%	7%	6.42
5	Levico	27	22%	19%	15%	11%	11%	0%	0%	5.5
6	Pro Sesto	27	52%	48%	44%	33%	22%	15%	11%	5.44
7	Brusaporto	27	22%	19%	11%	7%	7%	7%	4%	5.43
8	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	27	30%	26%	19%	19%	15%	11%	7%	5.4
9	Folgore Caratese	27	30%	30%	26%	19%	11%	7%	0%	5.1
10	Inveruno	27	30%	30%	22%	15%	11%	7%	7%	5
11	Scanzorosciate	27	19%	19%	15%	11%	7%	7%	4%	4.63
12	Caravaggio	27	30%	22%	19%	19%	7%	7%	4%	4.45
13	Legnano	27	30%	22%	19%	11%	4%	4%	4%	4.27
14	Dro Alto Garda	27	11%	11%	7%	4%	4%	0%	0%	4.25
15	Tritium	27	11%	11%	7%	7%	4%	0%	0%	3.6
16	Arconatese	27	30%	4%	4%	4%	4%	0%	0%	3.5
17	Seregno	27	26%	15%	7%	7%	4%	0%	0%	3.44
18	Virtus Bolzano	27	15%	11%	7%	4%	4%	0%	0%	3.43
19	Castellanzese	27	11%	7%	7%	4%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
20	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	27	26%	15%	7%	4%	4%	0%	0%	3.4
21	Villa Valle	27	7%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	0%	3.2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Levico	13	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	7
3	Inveruno	13	46%	46%	38%	23%	15%	15%	15%	6.33
4	Pontisola	13	62%	62%	54%	38%	23%	15%	8%	6.11
5	Scanzorosciate	13	31%	31%	23%	15%	8%	8%	0%	5.75
6	Nibionnoggiono	13	15%	15%	15%	8%	0%	0%	0%	5.5
7	Folgore Caratese	13	38%	38%	38%	23%	15%	8%	0%	5.33
8	Pro Sesto	13	62%	54%	46%	38%	15%	8%	8%	5
9	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	14	21%	21%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	4.75
10	Brusaporto	14	29%	29%	14%	7%	7%	7%	0%	4.6
11	Legnano	14	29%	21%	21%	14%	0%	0%	0%	4
12	Castellanzese	13	23%	15%	15%	8%	0%	0%	0%	4
13	Villa Valle	14	14%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	0%	3.75
14	Virtus Bolzano	14	14%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
15	Caravaggio	13	31%	15%	8%	8%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
16	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	13	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	3.4
17	Tritium	14	7%	7%	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	3
18	Arconatese	14	21%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
19	Seregno	14	21%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.75
20	Sondrio	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0
21	Dro Alto Garda	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Brusaporto	13	15%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	7.5
3	Pontisola	14	21%	21%	21%	14%	7%	7%	7%	7.33
4	Nibionnoggiono	14	29%	29%	21%	21%	21%	7%	7%	7.25
5	Sondrio	13	15%	15%	15%	15%	8%	0%	0%	6.5
6	Pro Sesto	14	43%	43%	43%	29%	29%	21%	14%	6
7	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	13	38%	31%	31%	31%	23%	15%	8%	5.83
8	Caravaggio	14	29%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	7%	5.33
9	Levico	14	36%	29%	21%	14%	14%	0%	0%	5.2
10	Folgore Caratese	14	21%	21%	14%	14%	7%	7%	0%	4.75
11	Legnano	13	31%	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	8%	4.6
12	Dro Alto Garda	13	23%	23%	15%	8%	8%	0%	0%	4.25
13	Seregno	13	31%	23%	15%	15%	8%	0%	0%	4
14	Tritium	13	15%	15%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	4
15	Arconatese	13	38%	8%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	3.8
16	Scanzorosciate	14	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.5
17	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	14	29%	14%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
18	Virtus Bolzano	13	15%	15%	15%	8%	8%	0%	0%	3.4
19	Inveruno	14	14%	14%	7%	7%	7%	0%	0%	3
20	Castellanzese	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1
21	Villa Valle	13	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Caravaggio	27	37%	37%	30%	26%	22%	19%	15%	7
3	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	27	33%	30%	26%	26%	19%	7%	7%	6.1
4	Villa Valle	27	15%	11%	11%	11%	11%	7%	7%	6
5	Brusaporto	27	26%	22%	22%	19%	7%	4%	0%	5.86
6	Castellanzese	27	19%	15%	11%	7%	4%	4%	4%	5.6
7	Virtus Bolzano	27	22%	22%	22%	22%	4%	0%	0%	5.57
8	Scanzorosciate	27	26%	19%	15%	11%	7%	7%	4%	5.38
9	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	27	37%	30%	22%	15%	11%	7%	0%	5.3
10	Dro Alto Garda	27	15%	11%	11%	7%	4%	0%	0%	5.25
11	Levico	27	19%	15%	7%	7%	4%	4%	4%	5.17
12	Arconatese	27	22%	22%	15%	15%	15%	7%	0%	5
13	Tritium	27	11%	11%	11%	11%	7%	4%	0%	4.6
14	Folgore Caratese	27	26%	26%	22%	7%	7%	4%	4%	4.6
15	Legnano	27	30%	30%	19%	15%	7%	4%	4%	4.36
16	Inveruno	27	22%	22%	19%	7%	7%	4%	0%	4.1
17	Pontisola	27	33%	19%	19%	11%	11%	4%	4%	4
18	Sondrio	27	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
19	Nibionnoggiono	27	15%	11%	7%	7%	4%	0%	0%	3.67
20	Seregno	27	22%	7%	4%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
21	Pro Sesto	27	33%	15%	11%	4%	0%	0%	0%	2.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Caravaggio	13	38%	38%	31%	31%	31%	23%	23%	8
3	Arconatese	14	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	7%	0%	7.33
4	Villa Valle	14	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	14%	14%	6.75
5	Virtus Bolzano	14	14%	14%	14%	14%	7%	0%	0%	6.5
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	14	29%	29%	21%	21%	14%	7%	0%	6.25
7	Castellanzese	13	31%	23%	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	6
8	Brusaporto	14	36%	29%	29%	29%	14%	7%	0%	6
9	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	13	31%	23%	23%	23%	23%	8%	8%	5.8
10	Scanzorosciate	13	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	8%	8%	5.25
11	Pontisola	13	46%	38%	38%	23%	23%	8%	8%	4.33
12	Legnano	14	36%	36%	14%	14%	7%	0%	0%	4.33
13	Folgore Caratese	13	31%	31%	23%	8%	8%	0%	0%	4.17
14	Levico	13	8%	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Inveruno	13	15%	15%	15%	8%	8%	8%	0%	3.33
16	Seregno	14	21%	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.25
17	Pro Sesto	13	46%	23%	15%	8%	0%	0%	0%	2.9
18	Nibionnoggiono	13	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.5
19	Tritium	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1
20	Sondrio	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0
21	Dro Alto Garda	14	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Tritium	13	23%	23%	23%	23%	15%	8%	0%	7
3	Bustese Milano City FC SSD	14	36%	36%	29%	29%	14%	7%	7%	6.4
4	Caravaggio	14	36%	36%	29%	21%	14%	14%	7%	6.17
5	Scanzorosciate	14	29%	21%	21%	14%	7%	7%	0%	5.5
6	Brusaporto	13	15%	15%	15%	8%	0%	0%	0%	5.5
7	Levico	14	29%	21%	14%	14%	7%	7%	7%	5.4
8	Folgore Caratese	14	21%	21%	21%	7%	7%	7%	7%	5.25
9	Inveruno	14	29%	29%	21%	7%	7%	0%	0%	5.25
10	Dro Alto Garda	13	31%	23%	23%	15%	8%	0%	0%	5.25
11	Virtus Bolzano	13	31%	31%	31%	31%	0%	0%	0%	5.2
12	Nibionnoggiono	14	21%	21%	14%	14%	7%	0%	0%	4.75
13	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	13	46%	31%	23%	8%	8%	8%	0%	4.67
14	Legnano	13	23%	23%	23%	15%	8%	8%	8%	4.4
15	Castellanzese	14	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
16	Sondrio	13	15%	15%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
17	Arconatese	13	23%	23%	8%	8%	8%	8%	0%	3.6
18	Pontisola	14	21%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
19	Villa Valle	13	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
20	Seregno	13	23%	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.8
21	Pro Sesto	14	21%	7%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2

Corner Statistics for Bustese Milano City FC SSD: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Bustese Milano City FC SSD across the 2019/20 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Bustese Milano City FC SSD Corner Averages (Serie D Group B)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Bustese Milano City FC SSD provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Bustese Milano City FC SSD, based on the most up-to-date data from the Serie D Group B:

Matches involving Bustese Milano City FC SSD average 9.5 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
18.52% of matches featuring Bustese Milano City FC SSD in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Bustese Milano City FC SSD records 3.4 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 3.7% of games, Bustese Milano City FC SSD registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Bustese Milano City FC SSD concedes an average of 6.1 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Bustese Milano City FC SSD in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Bustese Milano City FC SSD, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Bustese Milano City FC SSD?

According to the data, Bustese Milano City FC SSD averages 3.4 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Bustese Milano City FC SSD matches?

In the Serie D Group B, matches involving Bustese Milano City FC SSD average 9.5 total corners per game.