Season
2020
Country
China
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hangzhou | 15 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
2 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 20% | 7% | 0% |
3 | Beijing Renhe | 17 | 24% | 12% | 12% |
4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 20% | 7% | 7% |
5 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 13% | 7% | 7% |
6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% | 18% | 12% |
7 | Beijing BG | 15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 20% | 20% | 7% |
9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 29% | 18% | 6% |
10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 18% | 6% | 6% |
11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 13% | 7% | 0% |
12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 33% | 27% | 7% |
13 | Shenyang Urban | 15 | 27% | 20% | 13% |
14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 40% | 20% | 20% |
15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 33% | 33% | 7% |
16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 33% | 20% | 7% |
17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 40% | 33% | 13% |
18 | Kunshan | 15 | 40% | 27% | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hangzhou | 15 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 40% | 7% | 7% |
3 | Beijing Renhe | 17 | 35% | 12% | 6% |
4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 40% | 27% | 0% |
5 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 13% | 7% | 7% |
6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% | 6% | 6% |
7 | Beijing BG | 15 | 20% | 13% | 0% |
8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 27% | 13% | 13% |
9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 29% | 24% | 6% |
10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 24% | 6% | 0% |
11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
13 | Shenyang Urban | 15 | 27% | 7% | 7% |
14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 47% | 33% | 7% |
15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 47% | 27% | 13% |
16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 27% | 7% | 7% |
17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 53% | 33% | 0% |
18 | Kunshan | 15 | 40% | 27% | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hangzhou | 15 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
2 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 40% | 7% | 0% |
3 | Beijing Renhe | 17 | 18% | 6% | 6% |
4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 13% | 7% | 0% |
5 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 33% | 7% | 0% |
6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% | 18% | 6% |
7 | Beijing BG | 15 | 53% | 20% | 0% |
8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 29% | 6% | 6% |
10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 29% | 6% | 6% |
11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 13% | 13% | 0% |
12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 40% | 33% | 20% |
13 | Shenyang Urban | 15 | 33% | 20% | 7% |
14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 33% | 20% | 7% |
15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 40% | 27% | 7% |
17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 60% | 20% | 7% |
18 | Kunshan | 15 | 33% | 20% | 13% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Beijing Renhe’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 12% of their games played so far in the China League One 2020.
And on the other side of the ball, Beijing Renhe’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 18% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Beijing Renhe this season in the China League One:
You can follow the Beijing Renhe’s card situation in China League One all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.