Beijing Guoan corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2025

China

Workers' Stadium

Competition

China

Chinese Super League

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai Shenhua	29	93 %	86 %	79 %	69 %	48 %	38 %	31 %	12.18
2	Meizhou Hakka	29	83 %	79 %	62 %	48 %	34 %	28 %	24 %	11.17
3	Yunnan Yukun	29	86 %	76 %	66 %	55 %	52 %	31 %	24 %	11.1
4	Shandong Luneng	29	86 %	79 %	52 %	48 %	34 %	24 %	17 %	10.52
5	Henan Jianye	29	83 %	72 %	55 %	41 %	28 %	24 %	24 %	10.41
6	Beijing Guoan	29	76 %	66 %	52 %	41 %	31 %	21 %	14 %	10.24
7	Dalian Zhixing	29	83 %	72 %	66 %	48 %	31 %	17 %	14 %	10.21
8	Qingdao Youth Island	29	69 %	55 %	52 %	45 %	38 %	31 %	24 %	10.21
9	Chengdu Better City FC	29	69 %	59 %	52 %	28 %	24 %	24 %	14 %	9.76
10	Qingdao Jonoon	29	62 %	59 %	45 %	45 %	38 %	21 %	14 %	9.69
11	Sichuan Jiuniu	29	76 %	69 %	59 %	41 %	21 %	7 %	7 %	9.48
12	Changchun Yatai	29	62 %	59 %	45 %	34 %	24 %	17 %	10 %	9.45
13	Shanghai SIPG	29	79 %	62 %	48 %	28 %	14 %	10 %	3 %	9.31
14	Tianjin Teda	29	55 %	52 %	31 %	28 %	28 %	21 %	17 %	9.24
15	Wuhan Three Towns	29	62 %	52 %	41 %	28 %	14 %	10 %	10 %	8.86
16	Hangzhou	29	62 %	52 %	38 %	28 %	17 %	14 %	7 %	8.86

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai Shenhua	15	93 %	87 %	73 %	60 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	12.2
2	Shandong Luneng	15	87 %	87 %	67 %	67 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	11.54
3	Meizhou Hakka	15	87 %	87 %	67 %	53 %	33 %	20 %	20 %	11.4
4	Yunnan Yukun	15	87 %	80 %	67 %	47 %	47 %	27 %	20 %	10.86
5	Qingdao Youth Island	14	64 %	50 %	43 %	43 %	36 %	36 %	36 %	10.57
6	Dalian Zhixing	14	86 %	79 %	64 %	57 %	36 %	21 %	14 %	10.5
7	Sichuan Jiuniu	14	86 %	79 %	71 %	50 %	21 %	7 %	7 %	10.22
8	Beijing Guoan	14	71 %	64 %	50 %	36 %	36 %	29 %	14 %	10.14
9	Chengdu Better City FC	15	80 %	73 %	60 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	7 %	10.06
10	Henan Jianye	14	79 %	71 %	43 %	36 %	14 %	14 %	14 %	9.36
11	Shanghai SIPG	15	80 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	9.27
12	Wuhan Three Towns	14	64 %	43 %	36 %	21 %	21 %	14 %	14 %	9.14
13	Hangzhou	14	79 %	64 %	43 %	29 %	21 %	14 %	7 %	9.07
14	Changchun Yatai	15	53 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	8.8
15	Tianjin Teda	14	43 %	36 %	29 %	29 %	29 %	21 %	14 %	8.71
16	Qingdao Jonoon	15	47 %	40 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	13 %	13 %	8.67

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai Shenhua	14	93 %	86 %	86 %	79 %	50 %	36 %	29 %	12.14
2	Henan Jianye	15	87 %	73 %	67 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	33 %	11.4
3	Yunnan Yukun	14	86 %	71 %	64 %	64 %	57 %	36 %	29 %	11.36
4	Meizhou Hakka	14	79 %	71 %	57 %	43 %	36 %	36 %	29 %	10.93
5	Qingdao Jonoon	14	79 %	79 %	57 %	57 %	43 %	29 %	14 %	10.79
6	Beijing Guoan	15	80 %	67 %	53 %	47 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	10.33
7	Changchun Yatai	14	71 %	64 %	43 %	36 %	21 %	21 %	14 %	10.15
8	Dalian Zhixing	15	80 %	67 %	67 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	9.93
9	Qingdao Youth Island	15	73 %	60 %	60 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	9.87
10	Tianjin Teda	15	67 %	67 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	9.73
11	Shandong Luneng	14	86 %	71 %	36 %	29 %	29 %	14 %	7 %	9.43
12	Chengdu Better City FC	14	57 %	43 %	43 %	29 %	21 %	21 %	21 %	9.43
13	Shanghai SIPG	14	79 %	71 %	50 %	21 %	21 %	14 %	0 %	9.35
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	67 %	60 %	47 %	33 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	8.8
15	Hangzhou	15	47 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	8.66
16	Wuhan Three Towns	15	60 %	60 %	47 %	33 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.6

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Shenhua	29	97%	97%	97%	90%	83%	55%	31%	7.97
3	Chengdu Better City FC	29	90%	79%	66%	62%	45%	28%	21%	6.14
4	Henan Jianye	29	90%	83%	76%	59%	34%	31%	17%	5.93
5	Meizhou Hakka	29	79%	66%	59%	45%	38%	31%	28%	5.86
6	Beijing Guoan	29	90%	72%	62%	48%	31%	21%	14%	5.72
7	Dalian Zhixing	29	93%	79%	59%	55%	38%	21%	21%	5.69
8	Shandong Luneng	29	83%	83%	69%	55%	38%	21%	14%	5.62
9	Yunnan Yukun	29	79%	59%	48%	31%	28%	21%	10%	4.55
10	Shanghai SIPG	29	76%	69%	48%	28%	21%	7%	0%	4.38
11	Qingdao Youth Island	29	76%	62%	31%	28%	24%	14%	3%	4.31
12	Qingdao Jonoon	29	79%	55%	41%	28%	17%	14%	3%	4.21
13	Changchun Yatai	29	72%	48%	38%	31%	21%	7%	3%	4.14
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	29	83%	52%	38%	28%	7%	3%	3%	4.14
15	Wuhan Three Towns	29	66%	41%	34%	31%	17%	10%	7%	4.03
16	Tianjin Teda	29	72%	34%	28%	24%	17%	14%	10%	3.93
17	Hangzhou	29	66%	48%	34%	17%	14%	7%	0%	3.72

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Shenhua	15	100%	100%	100%	100%	87%	67%	40%	8.73
3	Chengdu Better City FC	15	100%	93%	73%	73%	60%	40%	27%	6.93
4	Shandong Luneng	15	100%	100%	87%	67%	47%	27%	20%	6.67
5	Beijing Guoan	14	100%	79%	71%	57%	43%	36%	21%	6.57
6	Meizhou Hakka	15	80%	73%	67%	53%	47%	40%	33%	6.53
7	Dalian Zhixing	14	100%	93%	71%	64%	50%	29%	29%	6.5
8	Henan Jianye	14	79%	79%	79%	64%	43%	36%	14%	5.86
9	Wuhan Three Towns	14	93%	64%	57%	50%	29%	21%	14%	5.43
10	Yunnan Yukun	15	87%	73%	60%	40%	33%	20%	13%	5.13
11	Shanghai SIPG	15	87%	87%	67%	33%	27%	7%	0%	5.07
12	Tianjin Teda	14	79%	50%	36%	29%	29%	29%	21%	5
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	14	93%	79%	50%	36%	14%	7%	7%	4.93
14	Qingdao Youth Island	14	71%	71%	29%	29%	29%	21%	7%	4.43
15	Qingdao Jonoon	15	73%	53%	47%	27%	13%	13%	7%	4.07
16	Changchun Yatai	15	73%	47%	33%	27%	13%	7%	7%	4
17	Hangzhou	14	64%	43%	36%	14%	14%	0%	0%	3.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Shenhua	14	93%	93%	93%	79%	79%	43%	21%	7.14
3	Henan Jianye	15	100%	87%	73%	53%	27%	27%	20%	6
4	Chengdu Better City FC	14	79%	64%	57%	50%	29%	14%	14%	5.29
5	Meizhou Hakka	14	79%	57%	50%	36%	29%	21%	21%	5.14
6	Beijing Guoan	15	80%	67%	53%	40%	20%	7%	7%	4.93
7	Dalian Zhixing	15	87%	67%	47%	47%	27%	13%	13%	4.93
8	Shandong Luneng	14	64%	64%	50%	43%	29%	14%	7%	4.5
9	Qingdao Jonoon	14	86%	57%	36%	29%	21%	14%	0%	4.36
10	Changchun Yatai	14	71%	50%	43%	36%	29%	7%	0%	4.29
11	Qingdao Youth Island	15	80%	53%	33%	27%	20%	7%	0%	4.2
12	Hangzhou	15	67%	53%	33%	20%	13%	13%	0%	3.93
13	Yunnan Yukun	14	71%	43%	36%	21%	21%	21%	7%	3.93
14	Shanghai SIPG	14	64%	50%	29%	21%	14%	7%	0%	3.64
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	73%	27%	27%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
16	Tianjin Teda	15	67%	20%	20%	20%	7%	0%	0%	2.93
17	Wuhan Three Towns	15	40%	20%	13%	13%	7%	0%	0%	2.73

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Yunnan Yukun	29	90%	79%	69%	62%	48%	38%	28%	6.55
3	Qingdao Youth Island	29	90%	72%	62%	55%	41%	31%	21%	5.9
4	Qingdao Jonoon	29	83%	66%	62%	48%	34%	28%	14%	5.48
5	Sichuan Jiuniu	29	76%	66%	62%	48%	34%	21%	14%	5.34
6	Changchun Yatai	29	93%	66%	52%	41%	28%	14%	14%	5.31
7	Tianjin Teda	29	90%	72%	41%	38%	31%	17%	17%	5.31
8	Meizhou Hakka	29	83%	69%	59%	48%	24%	21%	14%	5.31
9	Hangzhou	29	76%	69%	66%	45%	31%	17%	10%	5.14
10	Shanghai SIPG	29	79%	66%	52%	41%	24%	14%	14%	4.93
11	Shandong Luneng	29	76%	69%	52%	38%	31%	14%	3%	4.9
12	Wuhan Three Towns	29	90%	62%	48%	34%	28%	14%	7%	4.83
13	Beijing Guoan	29	72%	66%	48%	34%	31%	24%	3%	4.52
14	Dalian Zhixing	29	79%	59%	52%	34%	28%	10%	3%	4.52
15	Henan Jianye	29	76%	55%	38%	34%	24%	17%	17%	4.48
16	Shanghai Shenhua	29	76%	48%	34%	31%	21%	17%	3%	4.21
17	Chengdu Better City FC	29	62%	45%	31%	24%	14%	7%	3%	3.62

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Qingdao Youth Island	14	100%	71%	57%	57%	57%	36%	21%	6.14
3	Yunnan Yukun	15	87%	73%	60%	53%	40%	27%	20%	5.73
4	Hangzhou	14	86%	79%	71%	50%	36%	14%	7%	5.57
5	Sichuan Jiuniu	14	71%	64%	64%	50%	36%	14%	7%	5.29
6	Shandong Luneng	15	73%	67%	53%	33%	27%	13%	7%	4.87
7	Meizhou Hakka	15	73%	67%	67%	53%	20%	13%	0%	4.87
8	Changchun Yatai	15	87%	53%	47%	33%	33%	13%	13%	4.8
9	Qingdao Jonoon	15	67%	47%	47%	40%	27%	27%	13%	4.6
10	Shanghai SIPG	15	73%	53%	33%	33%	7%	7%	7%	4.2
11	Dalian Zhixing	14	71%	50%	36%	29%	21%	14%	0%	4
12	Tianjin Teda	14	86%	57%	21%	14%	7%	0%	0%	3.71
13	Wuhan Three Towns	14	86%	43%	29%	14%	7%	0%	0%	3.71
14	Beijing Guoan	14	57%	43%	29%	29%	21%	14%	0%	3.57
15	Henan Jianye	14	64%	43%	29%	21%	7%	7%	7%	3.5
16	Shanghai Shenhua	15	67%	27%	20%	20%	13%	7%	7%	3.47
17	Chengdu Better City FC	15	53%	33%	27%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.13

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Yunnan Yukun	14	93%	86%	79%	71%	57%	50%	36%	7.43
3	Tianjin Teda	15	93%	87%	60%	60%	53%	33%	33%	6.8
4	Qingdao Jonoon	14	100%	86%	79%	57%	43%	29%	14%	6.43
5	Wuhan Three Towns	15	93%	80%	67%	53%	47%	27%	13%	5.87
6	Changchun Yatai	14	100%	79%	57%	50%	21%	14%	14%	5.86
7	Meizhou Hakka	14	93%	71%	50%	43%	29%	29%	29%	5.79
8	Shanghai SIPG	14	86%	79%	71%	50%	43%	21%	21%	5.71
9	Qingdao Youth Island	15	80%	73%	67%	53%	27%	27%	20%	5.67
10	Henan Jianye	15	87%	67%	47%	47%	40%	27%	27%	5.4
11	Beijing Guoan	15	87%	87%	67%	40%	40%	33%	7%	5.4
12	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	80%	67%	60%	47%	33%	27%	20%	5.4
13	Shanghai Shenhua	14	86%	71%	50%	43%	29%	29%	0%	5
14	Dalian Zhixing	15	87%	67%	67%	40%	33%	7%	7%	5
15	Shandong Luneng	14	79%	71%	50%	43%	36%	14%	0%	4.93
16	Hangzhou	15	67%	60%	60%	40%	27%	20%	13%	4.73
17	Chengdu Better City FC	14	71%	57%	36%	29%	21%	14%	7%	4.14

Beijing Guoan corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Beijing Guoan’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Liga China:

Beijing Guoan games have an average of 10.24 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
52% of Beijing Guoan’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Beijing Guoan has an average of 5.72 corners won per game this season.
On 48% of occasions, Beijing Guoan had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Beijing Guoan usually concedes an average of 4.52 corners per match.

You can also check out Beijing Guoan’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.