Season
2022
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 85% | 68% | 53% |
2 | Miami FC | 35 | 71% | 54% | 40% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 37 | 76% | 57% | 41% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 34 | 79% | 62% | 50% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 71% | 41% | 26% |
6 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 76% | 56% | 38% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 65% | 62% | 47% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 56% | 39% | 22% |
9 | LA Galaxy II | 34 | 85% | 79% | 62% |
10 | Sacramento Republic | 36 | 89% | 72% | 58% |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 35 | 83% | 74% | 63% |
12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 82% | 74% | 56% |
13 | New York RB II | 34 | 82% | 65% | 53% |
14 | Colorado Springs | 37 | 81% | 73% | 62% |
15 | Louisville City | 37 | 78% | 62% | 43% |
16 | Orange County SC | 34 | 85% | 74% | 50% |
17 | San Antonio | 37 | 84% | 76% | 59% |
18 | New Mexico United | 35 | 69% | 63% | 46% |
19 | Memphis 901 | 36 | 81% | 69% | 42% |
20 | Loudoun United | 34 | 79% | 74% | 47% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 85% | 65% | 47% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 35 | 80% | 63% | 46% |
23 | El Paso Locomotive | 34 | 85% | 79% | 65% |
24 | Detroit City FC | 35 | 57% | 40% | 20% |
25 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 91% | 83% | 71% |
26 | Oakland Roots | 36 | 81% | 58% | 47% |
27 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 74% | 65% | 44% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 88% | 71% | 32% |
2 | Miami FC | 35 | 69% | 51% | 14% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 37 | 59% | 43% | 19% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 34 | 85% | 56% | 38% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 62% | 38% | 18% |
6 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 79% | 50% | 18% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 71% | 56% | 38% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 67% | 44% | 19% |
9 | LA Galaxy II | 34 | 88% | 65% | 41% |
10 | Sacramento Republic | 36 | 78% | 39% | 31% |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 35 | 74% | 51% | 23% |
12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 88% | 65% | 41% |
13 | New York RB II | 34 | 82% | 65% | 44% |
14 | Colorado Springs | 37 | 89% | 62% | 24% |
15 | Louisville City | 37 | 73% | 51% | 24% |
16 | Orange County SC | 34 | 82% | 56% | 35% |
17 | San Antonio | 37 | 81% | 54% | 35% |
18 | New Mexico United | 35 | 83% | 31% | 23% |
19 | Memphis 901 | 36 | 69% | 42% | 17% |
20 | Loudoun United | 34 | 82% | 56% | 24% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 79% | 56% | 21% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 35 | 77% | 40% | 23% |
23 | El Paso Locomotive | 34 | 88% | 74% | 47% |
24 | Detroit City FC | 35 | 57% | 31% | 9% |
25 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 89% | 63% | 37% |
26 | Oakland Roots | 36 | 78% | 53% | 36% |
27 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 74% | 47% | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 76% | 44% | 29% |
2 | Miami FC | 35 | 86% | 49% | 23% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 37 | 76% | 54% | 27% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 34 | 74% | 41% | 18% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 71% | 35% | 18% |
6 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 74% | 38% | 21% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 68% | 35% | 18% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 47% | 31% | 8% |
9 | LA Galaxy II | 34 | 88% | 56% | 47% |
10 | Sacramento Republic | 36 | 94% | 78% | 47% |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 35 | 89% | 71% | 46% |
12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 74% | 47% | 18% |
13 | New York RB II | 34 | 71% | 41% | 24% |
14 | Colorado Springs | 37 | 78% | 59% | 35% |
15 | Louisville City | 37 | 76% | 54% | 27% |
16 | Orange County SC | 34 | 76% | 62% | 32% |
17 | San Antonio | 37 | 92% | 65% | 38% |
18 | New Mexico United | 35 | 71% | 51% | 26% |
19 | Memphis 901 | 36 | 81% | 64% | 33% |
20 | Loudoun United | 34 | 79% | 50% | 18% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 74% | 50% | 18% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 35 | 80% | 57% | 31% |
23 | El Paso Locomotive | 34 | 82% | 68% | 32% |
24 | Detroit City FC | 35 | 69% | 37% | 17% |
25 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 89% | 66% | 43% |
26 | Oakland Roots | 36 | 78% | 53% | 22% |
27 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 79% | 47% | 35% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Atlanta United II’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 50% of their games played so far in the USL Championship 2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Atlanta United II’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 74% of their USL Championship matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Atlanta United II this season in the USL Championship:
You can follow the Atlanta United II’s card situation in USL Championship all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.