Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Miami FC |
8 | 25% | 25% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Atlanta SC |
6 | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |
Michigan Stars |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 33% | 33% | 11% |
| 7 |
LA Force |
9 | 56% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 |
Oakland Roots |
8 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
| 9 |
California Utd Strikers |
10 | 30% | 10% | 0% |
| 10 |
Philadelphia Fury |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
San Diego 1904 |
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Miami FC |
8 | 25% | 13% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Atlanta SC |
6 | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |
Michigan Stars |
2 | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| 6 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 56% | 11% | 11% |
| 7 |
LA Force |
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% |
| 8 |
Oakland Roots |
8 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
| 9 |
California Utd Strikers |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Philadelphia Fury |
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
San Diego 1904 |
8 | 63% | 38% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Miami FC |
8 | 63% | 13% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Atlanta SC |
6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Michigan Stars |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 44% | 33% | 0% |
| 7 |
LA Force |
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% |
| 8 |
Oakland Roots |
8 | 63% | 25% | 13% |
| 9 |
California Utd Strikers |
10 | 60% | 30% | 10% |
| 10 |
Philadelphia Fury |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
San Diego 1904 |
8 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
Atlanta SC card statistics
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Atlanta SC’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 33% of their games played so far in the NISA 2019/2020.
And on the other side of the ball, Atlanta SC’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 33% of their NISA matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Atlanta SC this season in the NISA:
- Overall, matches involving Atlanta SC have had 4 or more cards 33% of the time (those are cards given to both Atlanta SC and their opponents).
- In terms of Fair Play, Atlanta SC is in 7th place in the competition.
You can follow the Atlanta SC’s card situation in NISA all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.