Season
2021/22
Country
Italy
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Rende | 36 | 16 | 44% |
2 | ![]() Aversa Normanna | 36 | 11 | 31% |
3 | ![]() Cavese | 36 | 11 | 31% |
4 | ![]() Acireale | 36 | 17 | 47% |
5 | ![]() Portici | 36 | 16 | 44% |
6 | ![]() Gelbison | 36 | 16 | 44% |
7 | ![]() Biancavilla | 36 | 16 | 44% |
8 | ![]() Castrovillari | 36 | 17 | 47% |
9 | ![]() FC Messina | 0 | 0 | 0% |
10 | ![]() Licata | 36 | 20 | 56% |
11 | ![]() Troina | 36 | 20 | 56% |
12 | ![]() Sancataldese | 36 | 15 | 42% |
13 | ![]() Città Di Sant’Agata | 36 | 17 | 47% |
14 | ![]() San Luca | 36 | 21 | 58% |
15 | ![]() Santa Maria Cilento | 36 | 24 | 67% |
16 | ![]() Paternò | 36 | 15 | 42% |
17 | ![]() Giarre | 36 | 15 | 42% |
18 | ![]() Cittanova Interpiana | 36 | 17 | 47% |
19 | ![]() Lamezia Terme | 36 | 18 | 50% |
20 | ![]() Trapani 1905 | 36 | 16 | 44% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Rende | 18 | 7 | 39% |
2 | ![]() Aversa Normanna | 18 | 6 | 33% |
3 | ![]() Cavese | 18 | 5 | 28% |
4 | ![]() Acireale | 18 | 9 | 50% |
5 | ![]() Portici | 18 | 7 | 39% |
6 | ![]() Gelbison | 18 | 9 | 50% |
7 | ![]() Biancavilla | 18 | 9 | 50% |
8 | ![]() Castrovillari | 18 | 9 | 50% |
9 | ![]() FC Messina | 0 | 0 | 0% |
10 | ![]() Licata | 18 | 8 | 44% |
11 | ![]() Troina | 18 | 12 | 67% |
12 | ![]() Sancataldese | 18 | 8 | 44% |
13 | ![]() Città Di Sant’Agata | 18 | 10 | 56% |
14 | ![]() San Luca | 18 | 9 | 50% |
15 | ![]() Santa Maria Cilento | 18 | 14 | 78% |
16 | ![]() Paternò | 18 | 6 | 33% |
17 | ![]() Giarre | 18 | 7 | 39% |
18 | ![]() Cittanova Interpiana | 18 | 7 | 39% |
19 | ![]() Lamezia Terme | 18 | 9 | 50% |
20 | ![]() Trapani 1905 | 18 | 8 | 44% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Rende | 18 | 9 | 50% |
2 | ![]() Aversa Normanna | 18 | 5 | 28% |
3 | ![]() Cavese | 18 | 6 | 33% |
4 | ![]() Acireale | 18 | 8 | 44% |
5 | ![]() Portici | 18 | 9 | 50% |
6 | ![]() Gelbison | 18 | 7 | 39% |
7 | ![]() Biancavilla | 18 | 7 | 39% |
8 | ![]() Castrovillari | 18 | 8 | 44% |
9 | ![]() FC Messina | 0 | 0 | 0% |
10 | ![]() Licata | 18 | 12 | 67% |
11 | ![]() Troina | 18 | 8 | 44% |
12 | ![]() Sancataldese | 18 | 7 | 39% |
13 | ![]() Città Di Sant’Agata | 18 | 7 | 39% |
14 | ![]() San Luca | 18 | 12 | 67% |
15 | ![]() Santa Maria Cilento | 18 | 10 | 56% |
16 | ![]() Paternò | 18 | 9 | 50% |
17 | ![]() Giarre | 18 | 8 | 44% |
18 | ![]() Cittanova Interpiana | 18 | 10 | 56% |
19 | ![]() Lamezia Terme | 18 | 9 | 50% |
20 | ![]() Trapani 1905 | 18 | 8 | 44% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Biancavilla’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Serie D Group I 2021/2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Biancavilla in the competition:
You can also see Biancavilla’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.