Giana Erminio Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2022/23

Italy

Stadio Comunale

Competition

Italy

Serie D Group D

Summary Matches Corners Stats

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Giana Erminio	38	55%	45%	34%	24%	21%	18%	11%	10.08
2	Pistoiese	38	76%	63%	53%	37%	24%	11%	3%	10.07
3	Bagnolese	38	45%	39%	39%	26%	18%	5%	0%	10
4	Prato	38	47%	39%	32%	29%	21%	16%	13%	9.8
5	Forlì	38	53%	50%	42%	24%	18%	13%	3%	9.78
6	Real Forte Querceta	38	45%	37%	29%	29%	13%	8%	5%	9.66
7	Aglianese	38	42%	39%	34%	24%	18%	8%	5%	9.48
8	Sant'Angelo	38	53%	37%	29%	18%	11%	5%	5%	9.4
9	Salsomaggiore	38	24%	21%	16%	13%	5%	5%	5%	9.36
10	Ravenna	38	37%	32%	29%	24%	18%	16%	11%	9.27
11	Fanfulla	38	37%	34%	24%	16%	5%	3%	3%	9.21
12	Crema	38	47%	34%	24%	16%	11%	8%	3%	9.21
13	Mezzolara	38	63%	47%	37%	18%	11%	5%	5%	9.18
14	United Riccione	38	50%	34%	32%	24%	8%	8%	3%	8.96
15	Lentigione	38	39%	26%	21%	16%	11%	8%	0%	8.91
16	Athletic Carpi	38	34%	26%	18%	13%	13%	13%	5%	8.55
17	Sammaurese	38	29%	26%	16%	8%	5%	5%	5%	8.53
18	Scandicci	38	39%	37%	32%	16%	8%	5%	3%	8.37
19	Correggese	38	24%	21%	13%	11%	3%	0%	0%	8.31
20	Corticella	38	34%	26%	21%	11%	5%	3%	3%	8.04

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Giana Erminio	19	68%	58%	37%	26%	26%	26%	16%	10.79
2	Pistoiese	19	89%	79%	63%	47%	32%	16%	5%	10.5
3	United Riccione	19	58%	47%	47%	32%	11%	11%	5%	10.25
4	Forlì	19	58%	53%	53%	32%	21%	21%	5%	10.07
5	Aglianese	19	53%	47%	37%	26%	21%	11%	5%	9.84
6	Real Forte Querceta	19	53%	42%	37%	37%	21%	16%	11%	9.8
7	Prato	19	47%	47%	32%	32%	21%	16%	16%	9.69
8	Sant'Angelo	19	53%	37%	26%	16%	11%	0%	0%	9.45
9	Fanfulla	19	21%	21%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	9.4
10	Crema	19	47%	32%	21%	16%	5%	5%	0%	9.19
11	Ravenna	19	32%	26%	26%	26%	21%	16%	11%	8.91
12	Bagnolese	19	37%	26%	26%	16%	16%	0%	0%	8.82
13	Mezzolara	19	68%	53%	37%	11%	5%	0%	0%	8.62
14	Scandicci	19	53%	47%	42%	21%	11%	5%	0%	8.47
15	Sammaurese	19	11%	11%	11%	5%	5%	5%	5%	8.4
16	Athletic Carpi	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	5%	8.25
17	Correggese	19	16%	16%	16%	11%	0%	0%	0%	8.15
18	Lentigione	19	32%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	8.12
19	Corticella	19	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5%	7.66
20	Salsomaggiore	19	11%	11%	5%	5%	0%	0%	0%	7.6

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Bagnolese	19	53%	53%	53%	37%	21%	11%	0%	11.3
2	Salsomaggiore	19	37%	32%	26%	21%	11%	11%	11%	10.34
3	Prato	19	47%	32%	32%	26%	21%	16%	11%	9.92
4	Mezzolara	19	58%	42%	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	9.85
5	Ravenna	19	42%	37%	32%	21%	16%	16%	11%	9.64
6	Pistoiese	19	63%	47%	42%	26%	16%	5%	0%	9.53
7	Lentigione	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	21%	16%	0%	9.5
8	Real Forte Querceta	19	37%	32%	21%	21%	5%	0%	0%	9.45
9	Forlì	19	47%	47%	32%	16%	16%	5%	0%	9.42
10	Sant'Angelo	19	53%	37%	32%	21%	11%	11%	11%	9.36
11	Crema	19	47%	37%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5%	9.23
12	Giana Erminio	19	42%	32%	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	9.18
13	Fanfulla	19	53%	47%	32%	21%	5%	5%	5%	9.14
14	Aglianese	19	32%	32%	32%	21%	16%	5%	5%	9
15	Athletic Carpi	19	32%	26%	21%	16%	16%	16%	5%	8.9
16	Sammaurese	19	47%	42%	21%	11%	5%	5%	5%	8.57
17	Correggese	19	32%	26%	11%	11%	5%	0%	0%	8.45
18	Corticella	19	37%	32%	26%	11%	5%	0%	0%	8.45
19	Scandicci	19	26%	26%	21%	11%	5%	5%	5%	8.2
20	United Riccione	19	42%	21%	16%	16%	5%	5%	0%	7.77

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Forlì	38	66%	61%	50%	34%	26%	21%	13%	5.89
3	Pistoiese	38	79%	74%	58%	47%	26%	16%	5%	5.55
4	Prato	38	50%	42%	39%	32%	24%	21%	16%	5.52
5	Ravenna	38	47%	42%	32%	26%	13%	13%	13%	5.5
6	Mezzolara	38	74%	61%	47%	29%	21%	13%	5%	5.28
7	Giana Erminio	38	58%	45%	42%	32%	18%	11%	8%	5.2
8	Sant'Angelo	38	61%	47%	37%	16%	11%	11%	8%	5.04
9	Crema	38	53%	45%	39%	24%	16%	5%	5%	5
10	Corticella	38	45%	42%	32%	21%	18%	13%	8%	4.87
11	Salsomaggiore	38	32%	29%	21%	18%	8%	0%	0%	4.79
12	Lentigione	38	45%	34%	32%	21%	8%	5%	0%	4.48
13	Athletic Carpi	38	47%	32%	21%	11%	11%	11%	5%	4.32
14	United Riccione	38	47%	34%	24%	16%	11%	5%	3%	3.92
15	Fanfulla	38	37%	26%	16%	8%	3%	3%	3%	3.89
16	Real Forte Querceta	38	50%	29%	24%	11%	3%	0%	0%	3.83
17	Bagnolese	38	37%	32%	18%	16%	11%	5%	3%	3.76
18	Scandicci	38	50%	34%	13%	13%	11%	5%	0%	3.67
19	Aglianese	38	42%	32%	18%	8%	5%	0%	0%	3.65
20	Correggese	38	34%	18%	11%	3%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
21	Sammaurese	38	32%	26%	11%	8%	0%	0%	0%	3.42

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Pistoiese	19	84%	84%	79%	74%	42%	32%	11%	6.39
3	Prato	19	53%	47%	47%	42%	37%	32%	21%	6.23
4	Forlì	19	79%	68%	53%	37%	32%	26%	21%	6.2
5	Giana Erminio	19	63%	58%	53%	42%	26%	16%	16%	5.79
6	Crema	19	53%	53%	47%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5.64
7	Ravenna	19	47%	37%	21%	21%	16%	16%	16%	5.36
8	Sant'Angelo	19	58%	53%	42%	16%	11%	11%	5%	5.36
9	Mezzolara	19	79%	58%	58%	37%	26%	16%	5%	5.31
10	Fanfulla	19	26%	26%	16%	5%	0%	0%	0%	4.8
11	United Riccione	19	47%	42%	37%	21%	16%	5%	5%	4.75
12	Lentigione	19	42%	32%	32%	21%	0%	0%	0%	4.56
13	Corticella	19	47%	42%	26%	16%	16%	11%	0%	4.33
14	Athletic Carpi	19	42%	32%	21%	16%	16%	16%	11%	4.33
15	Correggese	19	37%	26%	16%	5%	0%	0%	0%	4.29
16	Real Forte Querceta	19	68%	37%	32%	16%	5%	0%	0%	4
17	Aglianese	19	58%	42%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.92
18	Scandicci	19	68%	53%	16%	16%	11%	5%	0%	3.76
19	Sammaurese	19	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.2
20	Salsomaggiore	19	16%	16%	5%	5%	0%	0%	0%	3.2
21	Bagnolese	19	37%	32%	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	3.18

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Salsomaggiore	19	47%	42%	37%	32%	16%	0%	0%	5.67
3	Ravenna	19	47%	47%	42%	32%	11%	11%	11%	5.64
4	Forlì	19	53%	53%	47%	32%	21%	16%	5%	5.5
5	Corticella	19	42%	42%	37%	26%	21%	16%	16%	5.45
6	Mezzolara	19	68%	63%	37%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5.23
7	Sant'Angelo	19	63%	42%	32%	16%	11%	11%	11%	4.79
8	Prato	19	47%	37%	32%	21%	11%	11%	11%	4.75
9	Pistoiese	19	74%	63%	37%	21%	11%	0%	0%	4.53
10	Crema	19	53%	37%	32%	21%	11%	5%	5%	4.46
11	Giana Erminio	19	53%	32%	32%	21%	11%	5%	0%	4.45
12	Lentigione	19	47%	37%	32%	21%	16%	11%	0%	4.42
13	Bagnolese	19	37%	32%	26%	26%	16%	5%	5%	4.4
14	Athletic Carpi	19	53%	32%	21%	5%	5%	5%	0%	4.3
15	Fanfulla	19	47%	26%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5%	3.57
16	Real Forte Querceta	19	32%	21%	16%	5%	0%	0%	0%	3.56
17	Sammaurese	19	47%	42%	16%	16%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
18	Scandicci	19	32%	16%	11%	11%	11%	5%	0%	3.5
19	Aglianese	19	26%	21%	16%	5%	5%	0%	0%	3.3
20	United Riccione	19	47%	26%	11%	11%	5%	5%	0%	3.15
21	Correggese	19	32%	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.89

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Bagnolese	38	55%	50%	39%	32%	18%	16%	11%	6.24
3	Real Forte Querceta	38	58%	55%	42%	34%	24%	11%	8%	5.83
4	Aglianese	38	55%	50%	45%	29%	18%	18%	8%	5.83
5	Fanfulla	38	39%	34%	34%	32%	29%	5%	0%	5.32
6	Sammaurese	38	42%	32%	24%	18%	16%	13%	8%	5.11
7	United Riccione	38	63%	47%	37%	24%	11%	5%	5%	5.04
8	Giana Erminio	38	53%	39%	34%	21%	13%	13%	11%	4.88
9	Correggese	38	37%	32%	21%	16%	8%	3%	3%	4.81
10	Scandicci	38	55%	47%	34%	29%	18%	11%	3%	4.7
11	Salsomaggiore	38	34%	18%	11%	8%	8%	8%	8%	4.57
12	Pistoiese	38	79%	55%	42%	26%	11%	5%	3%	4.52
13	Lentigione	38	45%	34%	24%	11%	8%	8%	5%	4.43
14	Sant'Angelo	38	53%	45%	32%	21%	5%	3%	0%	4.36
15	Prato	38	50%	34%	24%	18%	13%	8%	8%	4.28
16	Athletic Carpi	38	37%	32%	26%	18%	8%	8%	5%	4.23
17	Crema	38	50%	42%	26%	8%	5%	5%	3%	4.21
18	Mezzolara	38	50%	37%	32%	21%	13%	5%	3%	3.9
19	Forlì	38	55%	42%	21%	11%	5%	5%	3%	3.89
20	Ravenna	38	39%	34%	21%	11%	5%	3%	0%	3.77
21	Corticella	38	34%	24%	16%	5%	5%	5%	3%	3.17

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Aglianese	19	63%	63%	58%	32%	16%	16%	11%	5.92
3	Real Forte Querceta	19	68%	63%	42%	42%	32%	16%	16%	5.8
4	Bagnolese	19	58%	47%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5%	5.64
5	United Riccione	19	63%	47%	42%	37%	11%	5%	5%	5.5
6	Sammaurese	19	21%	16%	11%	11%	11%	11%	5%	5.2
7	Giana Erminio	19	58%	47%	42%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5
8	Scandicci	19	68%	58%	53%	42%	26%	11%	0%	4.71
9	Fanfulla	19	21%	16%	16%	11%	11%	0%	0%	4.6
10	Salsomaggiore	19	21%	11%	11%	5%	5%	5%	5%	4.4
11	Pistoiese	19	79%	58%	42%	21%	5%	0%	0%	4.11
12	Sant'Angelo	19	42%	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	0%	4.09
13	Athletic Carpi	19	42%	32%	21%	11%	5%	5%	5%	3.92
14	Forlì	19	63%	42%	26%	16%	5%	5%	0%	3.87
15	Correggese	19	26%	16%	11%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.86
16	Lentigione	19	37%	26%	16%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.56
17	Ravenna	19	37%	32%	16%	16%	5%	5%	0%	3.55
18	Crema	19	42%	37%	16%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.55
19	Prato	19	53%	21%	11%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.46
20	Corticella	19	37%	26%	16%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.33
21	Mezzolara	19	47%	32%	26%	21%	11%	0%	0%	3.31

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Bagnolese	19	53%	53%	42%	37%	21%	21%	16%	6.9
3	Real Forte Querceta	19	47%	47%	42%	26%	16%	5%	0%	5.89
4	Aglianese	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	21%	21%	5%	5.7
5	Fanfulla	19	58%	53%	53%	53%	47%	11%	0%	5.57
6	Correggese	19	47%	47%	32%	21%	11%	5%	5%	5.56
7	Prato	19	47%	47%	37%	32%	21%	11%	11%	5.17
8	Lentigione	19	53%	42%	32%	21%	16%	16%	11%	5.08
9	Sammaurese	19	63%	47%	37%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5.07
10	Pistoiese	19	79%	53%	42%	32%	16%	11%	5%	5
11	Crema	19	58%	47%	37%	16%	11%	11%	5%	4.77
12	Giana Erminio	19	47%	32%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	4.73
13	Scandicci	19	42%	37%	16%	16%	11%	11%	5%	4.7
14	Salsomaggiore	19	47%	26%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	4.67
15	Mezzolara	19	53%	42%	37%	21%	16%	11%	5%	4.62
16	United Riccione	19	63%	47%	32%	11%	11%	5%	5%	4.62
17	Athletic Carpi	19	32%	32%	32%	26%	11%	11%	5%	4.6
18	Sant'Angelo	19	63%	58%	42%	26%	0%	0%	0%	4.57
19	Ravenna	19	42%	37%	26%	5%	5%	0%	0%	4
20	Forlì	19	47%	42%	16%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.92
21	Corticella	19	32%	21%	16%	5%	5%	5%	0%	3

Corner Statistics for Giana Erminio: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Giana Erminio across the 2022/23 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Giana Erminio Corner Averages (Serie D Group D)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Giana Erminio provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Giana Erminio, based on the most up-to-date data from the Serie D Group D:

Matches involving Giana Erminio average 10.08 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
34.21% of matches featuring Giana Erminio in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Giana Erminio records 5.2 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 31.58% of games, Giana Erminio registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Giana Erminio concedes an average of 4.88 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Giana Erminio in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Giana Erminio, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Giana Erminio?

According to the data, Giana Erminio averages 5.2 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Giana Erminio matches?

In the Serie D Group D, matches involving Giana Erminio average 10.08 total corners per game.