Season
2012/13
Country
Italy
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carpi | 36 | 18 | 50% |
2 | Frosinone | 30 | 14 | 47% |
3 | Avellino | 32 | 17 | 53% |
4 | Benevento | 30 | 14 | 47% |
5 | Perugia | 32 | 16 | 50% |
6 | Latina | 34 | 18 | 53% |
7 | Pisa | 34 | 20 | 59% |
8 | Virtus Entella | 34 | 21 | 62% |
9 | Trapani | 34 | 20 | 59% |
10 | Como | 32 | 19 | 59% |
11 | Cremonese | 32 | 16 | 50% |
12 | Südtirol | 34 | 20 | 59% |
13 | Gubbio | 30 | 16 | 53% |
14 | Paganese | 30 | 12 | 40% |
15 | Prato | 32 | 16 | 50% |
16 | Lecce | 36 | 20 | 56% |
17 | AlbinoLeffe | 32 | 21 | 66% |
18 | Cuneo | 34 | 14 | 41% |
19 | FeralpiSalò | 32 | 13 | 41% |
20 | Catanzaro | 30 | 15 | 50% |
21 | Reggiana | 34 | 14 | 41% |
22 | Carrarese | 30 | 15 | 50% |
23 | Lumezzane | 32 | 19 | 59% |
24 | Pavia | 32 | 12 | 38% |
25 | San Marino Calcio | 32 | 15 | 47% |
26 | Barletta | 32 | 10 | 31% |
27 | Nocerina | 32 | 16 | 50% |
28 | Viareggio | 30 | 18 | 60% |
29 | Tritium | 34 | 17 | 50% |
30 | Sorrento Calcio | 32 | 15 | 47% |
31 | Portosummaga | 34 | 18 | 53% |
32 | Andria BAT | 32 | 12 | 38% |
33 | Treviso | 32 | 17 | 53% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carpi | 18 | 8 | 44% |
2 | Frosinone | 15 | 10 | 67% |
3 | Avellino | 16 | 7 | 44% |
4 | Benevento | 15 | 5 | 33% |
5 | Perugia | 16 | 10 | 63% |
6 | Latina | 17 | 7 | 41% |
7 | Pisa | 17 | 8 | 47% |
8 | Virtus Entella | 17 | 9 | 53% |
9 | Trapani | 17 | 5 | 29% |
10 | Como | 16 | 9 | 56% |
11 | Cremonese | 16 | 8 | 50% |
12 | Südtirol | 17 | 9 | 53% |
13 | Gubbio | 15 | 9 | 60% |
14 | Paganese | 15 | 5 | 33% |
15 | Prato | 16 | 7 | 44% |
16 | Lecce | 18 | 9 | 50% |
17 | AlbinoLeffe | 16 | 11 | 69% |
18 | Cuneo | 17 | 6 | 35% |
19 | FeralpiSalò | 16 | 8 | 50% |
20 | Catanzaro | 15 | 9 | 60% |
21 | Reggiana | 17 | 9 | 53% |
22 | Carrarese | 15 | 8 | 53% |
23 | Lumezzane | 16 | 10 | 63% |
24 | Pavia | 16 | 8 | 50% |
25 | San Marino Calcio | 16 | 7 | 44% |
26 | Barletta | 16 | 5 | 31% |
27 | Nocerina | 16 | 8 | 50% |
28 | Viareggio | 15 | 10 | 67% |
29 | Tritium | 17 | 9 | 53% |
30 | Sorrento Calcio | 16 | 8 | 50% |
31 | Portosummaga | 17 | 10 | 59% |
32 | Andria BAT | 16 | 6 | 38% |
33 | Treviso | 16 | 12 | 75% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carpi | 18 | 10 | 56% |
2 | Frosinone | 15 | 4 | 27% |
3 | Avellino | 16 | 10 | 63% |
4 | Benevento | 15 | 9 | 60% |
5 | Perugia | 16 | 6 | 38% |
6 | Latina | 17 | 11 | 65% |
7 | Pisa | 17 | 12 | 71% |
8 | Virtus Entella | 17 | 12 | 71% |
9 | Trapani | 17 | 15 | 88% |
10 | Como | 16 | 10 | 63% |
11 | Cremonese | 16 | 8 | 50% |
12 | Südtirol | 17 | 11 | 65% |
13 | Gubbio | 15 | 7 | 47% |
14 | Paganese | 15 | 7 | 47% |
15 | Prato | 16 | 9 | 56% |
16 | Lecce | 18 | 11 | 61% |
17 | AlbinoLeffe | 16 | 10 | 63% |
18 | Cuneo | 17 | 8 | 47% |
19 | FeralpiSalò | 16 | 5 | 31% |
20 | Catanzaro | 15 | 6 | 40% |
21 | Reggiana | 17 | 5 | 29% |
22 | Carrarese | 15 | 7 | 47% |
23 | Lumezzane | 16 | 9 | 56% |
24 | Pavia | 16 | 4 | 25% |
25 | San Marino Calcio | 16 | 8 | 50% |
26 | Barletta | 16 | 5 | 31% |
27 | Nocerina | 16 | 8 | 50% |
28 | Viareggio | 15 | 8 | 53% |
29 | Tritium | 17 | 8 | 47% |
30 | Sorrento Calcio | 16 | 7 | 44% |
31 | Portosummaga | 17 | 8 | 47% |
32 | Andria BAT | 16 | 6 | 38% |
33 | Treviso | 16 | 5 | 31% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Andria BAT’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Serie C 2012/2013 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Andria BAT in the competition:
You can also see Andria BAT’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.