Xinjiang Tianshan 0 - 1 Kunshan
15.10.2020 - 06:30
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Hangzhou | 15 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 2 |  Changchun Yatai | 15 | 20% | 7% | 0% |
| 3 |  Beijing Renhe | 17 | 24% | 12% | 12% |
| 4 |  Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 20% | 7% | 7% |
| 5 |  Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 13% | 7% | 7% |
| 6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% | 18% | 12% |
| 7 |  Beijing BG | 15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
| 8 |  Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 20% | 20% | 7% |
| 9 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 29% | 18% | 6% |
| 10 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 18% | 6% | 6% |
| 11 |  Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 13% | 7% | 0% |
| 12 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 33% | 27% | 7% |
| 13 |  Shenyang Urban | 15 | 27% | 20% | 13% |
| 14 |  Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 15 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 33% | 33% | 7% |
| 16 |  Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 33% | 20% | 7% |
| 17 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 40% | 33% | 13% |
| 18 | Kunshan | 15 | 40% | 27% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hangzhou | 15 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 40% | 7% | 7% |
| 3 | Beijing Renhe | 17 | 35% | 12% | 6% |
| 4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 40% | 27% | 0% |
| 5 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 13% | 7% | 7% |
| 6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% | 6% | 6% |
| 7 | Beijing BG | 15 | 20% | 13% | 0% |
| 8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 27% | 13% | 13% |
| 9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 29% | 24% | 6% |
| 10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 24% | 6% | 0% |
| 11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
| 13 | Shenyang Urban | 15 | 27% | 7% | 7% |
| 14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 47% | 33% | 7% |
| 15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 47% | 27% | 13% |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 27% | 7% | 7% |
| 17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 53% | 33% | 0% |
| 18 | Kunshan | 15 | 40% | 27% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hangzhou | 15 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 2 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 40% | 7% | 0% |
| 3 | Beijing Renhe | 17 | 18% | 6% | 6% |
| 4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 13% | 7% | 0% |
| 5 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 33% | 7% | 0% |
| 6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% | 18% | 6% |
| 7 | Beijing BG | 15 | 53% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
| 9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 29% | 6% | 6% |
| 10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 29% | 6% | 6% |
| 11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 13% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 40% | 33% | 20% |
| 13 | Shenyang Urban | 15 | 33% | 20% | 7% |
| 14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 33% | 20% | 7% |
| 15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 40% | 27% | 7% |
| 17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 60% | 20% | 7% |
| 18 | Kunshan | 15 | 33% | 20% | 13% |
Check out all the card statistics for Xinjiang Tianshan vs Kunshan here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Xinjiang Tianshan has played 17 matches in the China League One and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 41% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 6% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 6% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Kunshan has, in 15 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 40% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 27% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 13% of matches.
Card statistics for Xinjiang Tianshan vs Kunshan bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the China League One, just check out the table above.