Wuhan Zall 0 - 0 Shanghai SIPG
19.07.2021 - 04:30
Stadium: Jiangyin Sports Park Stadium (Jiangyin)
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 10.81 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG |
22 | 86% | 68% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 10.43 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 9.91 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 73% | 59% | 50% | 50% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.9 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 64% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.81 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 68% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 14% | 14% | 9% | 9.52 |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng |
22 | 77% | 68% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 50% | 41% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 9.14 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 0% | 9 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 68% | 59% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 8.9 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 64% | 50% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.68 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
22 | 68% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 8.66 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye |
22 | 50% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 8.4 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 55% | 41% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.34 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
22 | 45% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 11.1 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 10.2 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 10 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 73% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 10.45 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 11 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.2 |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 9.34 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.09 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
11 | 55% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.91 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.55 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 10.64 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.82 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.3 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 8.5 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 10.73 |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 10 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.1 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.91 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.18 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.1 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.09 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 73% | 68% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 4.86 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
22 | 59% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
22 | 95% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 6.95 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
22 | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.14 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.32 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
22 | 77% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 9% | 5.71 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 50% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.57 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 86% | 82% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.9 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
22 | 59% | 50% | 45% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 4.14 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.38 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 91% | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 7.19 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 77% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 5% | 3.95 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 50% | 36% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.23 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 6.8 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 82% | 82% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.18 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.2 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5.67 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 7.9 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 91% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.64 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.3 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.4 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 3.48 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
22 | 82% | 64% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
22 | 59% | 32% | 32% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.48 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
22 | 64% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 77% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 4.76 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 91% | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.36 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.38 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
22 | 68% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 64% | 36% | 23% | 23% | 5.95 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 3.1 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
22 | 77% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 4.52 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 55% | 45% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.81 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 95% | 86% | 77% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 6.68 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.36 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.64 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.1 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.55 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.82 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 5.91 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 7.27 |
The average number of corners for Wuhan Zall vs Shanghai SIPG can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Wuhan Zall have averaged 8.9 corners per match during this Chinese Super League campaign. They have taken 3.95 corners per match, while they concede an average of 4.95 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Shanghai SIPG, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Shanghai SIPG: 10.43
- Average number of corners in favour: 6.95
- Average number of corners conceded: 3.48
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Wuhan Zall vs Shanghai SIPG. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.