Favourite this Match

Wuhan Zall 0 - 0 Shanghai SIPG

19.07.2021 - 04:30

Stadium: Jiangyin Sports Park Stadium (Jiangyin)

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Guangzhou Evergrande Team Logo

Guangzhou Evergrande

22 9 41%
2
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Team Logo

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright

22 13 59%
3
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

22 9 41%
4
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

22 9 41%
5
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

22 12 55%
6
Hebei CFFC Team Logo

Hebei CFFC

22 9 41%
7
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Team Logo

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

22 11 50%
8
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

22 12 55%
9
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

22 12 55%
10
Guangzhou R&F Team Logo

Guangzhou R&F

22 13 59%
11
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

22 12 55%
12
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

22 12 55%
13
Dalian Yifang Team Logo

Dalian Yifang

22 10 45%
14
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

22 13 59%
15
Wuhan Zall Team Logo

Wuhan Zall

22 14 64%
16
Qingdao Huanghai Team Logo

Qingdao Huanghai

22 8 36%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Guangzhou Evergrande Team Logo

Guangzhou Evergrande

11 5 45%
2
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Team Logo

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright

11 4 36%
3
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

11 2 18%
4
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

11 6 55%
5
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

11 8 73%
6
Hebei CFFC Team Logo

Hebei CFFC

11 5 45%
7
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Team Logo

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

11 3 27%
8
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

11 5 45%
9
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

11 6 55%
10
Guangzhou R&F Team Logo

Guangzhou R&F

11 8 73%
11
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

11 6 55%
12
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

11 8 73%
13
Dalian Yifang Team Logo

Dalian Yifang

11 5 45%
14
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

11 5 45%
15
Wuhan Zall Team Logo

Wuhan Zall

11 9 82%
16
Qingdao Huanghai Team Logo

Qingdao Huanghai

11 4 36%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Guangzhou Evergrande Team Logo

Guangzhou Evergrande

11 4 36%
2
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Team Logo

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright

11 9 82%
3
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

11 7 64%
4
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

11 3 27%
5
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

11 4 36%
6
Hebei CFFC Team Logo

Hebei CFFC

11 4 36%
7
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Team Logo

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

11 8 73%
8
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

11 7 64%
9
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

11 6 55%
10
Guangzhou R&F Team Logo

Guangzhou R&F

11 5 45%
11
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

11 6 55%
12
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

11 4 36%
13
Dalian Yifang Team Logo

Dalian Yifang

11 5 45%
14
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

11 8 73%
15
Wuhan Zall Team Logo

Wuhan Zall

11 5 45%
16
Qingdao Huanghai Team Logo

Qingdao Huanghai

11 4 36%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Wuhan Zall and Shanghai SIPG have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Chinese Super League.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 22 matches played in the Chinese Super League, Wuhan Zall has scored and conceded goals in 14 matches. In other words, 64% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 82% at home, while it is 45% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Shanghai SIPG has scored and conceded in 9 of their 22 matches so far in the Chinese Super League, giving them a BTTS rate of 41%. Both teams have scored in 2 of Shanghai SIPG’s 11 home matches, and it has happened 7 times in 11 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets