# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 7 | 44% |
2 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
16 | 6 | 38% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 5 | 31% |
4 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 5 | 31% |
5 |
![]() Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 5 | 31% |
6 |
![]() Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 4 | 25% |
7 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
16 | 3 | 19% |
8 |
![]() Hangzhou |
16 | 3 | 19% |
9 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
16 | 3 | 19% |
10 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 3 | 19% |
11 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
16 | 2 | 13% |
12 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
16 | 2 | 13% |
13 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
16 | 2 | 13% |
14 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 1 | 6% |
16 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 1 | 6% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
9 | 5 | 56% |
2 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
8 | 4 | 50% |
3 |
![]() Dalian Zhixing |
8 | 4 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
8 | 3 | 38% |
5 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
8 | 3 | 38% |
6 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
7 | 3 | 43% |
7 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
9 | 2 | 22% |
8 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
8 | 2 | 25% |
9 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
8 | 2 | 25% |
10 |
![]() Yunnan Yukun |
7 | 2 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Hangzhou |
7 | 1 | 14% |
12 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
9 | 1 | 11% |
13 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
8 | 1 | 13% |
14 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
8 | 1 | 13% |
15 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
8 | 1 | 13% |
16 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
8 | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
8 | 3 | 38% |
2 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
8 | 3 | 38% |
3 |
![]() Yunnan Yukun |
9 | 3 | 33% |
4 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
8 | 2 | 25% |
5 |
![]() Hangzhou |
9 | 2 | 22% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
8 | 2 | 25% |
7 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
8 | 2 | 25% |
8 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
7 | 1 | 14% |
9 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
8 | 0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
8 | 0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
9 | 0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
7 | 0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
8 | 0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
8 | 0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
7 | 0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Dalian Zhixing |
8 | 0 | 0% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.