Favourite this Match

Taranto 3 - 1 Como

06.11.2011 - 08:30

Stadium: Stadio Comunale Erasmo Iacovone

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Carpi Team Logo

Carpi

38 17 45%
2
Frosinone Team Logo

Frosinone

34 19 56%
3
Avellino Team Logo

Avellino

34 18 53%
4
Benevento Team Logo

Benevento

34 15 44%
5
Ternana Team Logo

Ternana

36 14 39%
6
Latina Team Logo

Latina

36 20 56%
7
Pisa Team Logo

Pisa

34 15 44%
8
Pro Vercelli Team Logo

Pro Vercelli

38 14 37%
9
SPAL Team Logo

SPAL

36 13 36%
10
Spezia Team Logo

Spezia

36 19 53%
11
Trapani Team Logo

Trapani

38 22 58%
12
Virtus Lanciano Team Logo

Virtus Lanciano

38 21 55%
13
Como Team Logo

Como

34 22 65%
14
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

34 16 47%
15
Cremonese Team Logo

Cremonese

36 17 47%
16
Südtirol Team Logo

Südtirol

34 20 59%
17
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

36 17 47%
18
Triestina Team Logo

Triestina

36 21 58%
19
Prato Team Logo

Prato

36 15 42%
20
Bassano Virtus Team Logo

Bassano Virtus

34 13 38%
21
FeralpiSalò Team Logo

FeralpiSalò

34 13 38%
22
Reggiana Team Logo

Reggiana

34 17 50%
23
Monza Team Logo

Monza

36 17 47%
24
Carrarese Team Logo

Carrarese

34 17 50%
25
Siracusa Team Logo

Siracusa

36 17 47%
26
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

36 14 39%
27
Lumezzane Team Logo

Lumezzane

34 9 26%
28
Pavia Team Logo

Pavia

36 21 58%
29
Barletta Team Logo

Barletta

34 21 62%
30
Viareggio Team Logo

Viareggio

36 14 39%
31
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

34 14 41%
32
Pergocrema Team Logo

Pergocrema

34 13 38%
33
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

34 14 41%
34
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

36 13 36%
35
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

34 18 53%
36
Andria BAT Team Logo

Andria BAT

34 18 53%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Carpi Team Logo

Carpi

19 8 42%
2
Frosinone Team Logo

Frosinone

17 12 71%
3
Avellino Team Logo

Avellino

17 10 59%
4
Benevento Team Logo

Benevento

17 5 29%
5
Ternana Team Logo

Ternana

18 8 44%
6
Latina Team Logo

Latina

18 10 56%
7
Pisa Team Logo

Pisa

17 9 53%
8
Pro Vercelli Team Logo

Pro Vercelli

19 3 16%
9
SPAL Team Logo

SPAL

18 8 44%
10
Spezia Team Logo

Spezia

18 7 39%
11
Trapani Team Logo

Trapani

19 11 58%
12
Virtus Lanciano Team Logo

Virtus Lanciano

19 11 58%
13
Como Team Logo

Como

17 10 59%
14
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

17 9 53%
15
Cremonese Team Logo

Cremonese

18 10 56%
16
Südtirol Team Logo

Südtirol

17 8 47%
17
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

18 9 50%
18
Triestina Team Logo

Triestina

18 12 67%
19
Prato Team Logo

Prato

18 9 50%
20
Bassano Virtus Team Logo

Bassano Virtus

17 5 29%
21
FeralpiSalò Team Logo

FeralpiSalò

17 7 41%
22
Reggiana Team Logo

Reggiana

17 9 53%
23
Monza Team Logo

Monza

18 8 44%
24
Carrarese Team Logo

Carrarese

17 8 47%
25
Siracusa Team Logo

Siracusa

18 7 39%
26
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

18 6 33%
27
Lumezzane Team Logo

Lumezzane

17 5 29%
28
Pavia Team Logo

Pavia

18 8 44%
29
Barletta Team Logo

Barletta

17 9 53%
30
Viareggio Team Logo

Viareggio

18 8 44%
31
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

17 9 53%
32
Pergocrema Team Logo

Pergocrema

17 6 35%
33
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

17 8 47%
34
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

18 7 39%
35
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

17 11 65%
36
Andria BAT Team Logo

Andria BAT

17 9 53%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Carpi Team Logo

Carpi

19 9 47%
2
Frosinone Team Logo

Frosinone

17 7 41%
3
Avellino Team Logo

Avellino

17 8 47%
4
Benevento Team Logo

Benevento

17 10 59%
5
Ternana Team Logo

Ternana

18 6 33%
6
Latina Team Logo

Latina

18 10 56%
7
Pisa Team Logo

Pisa

17 6 35%
8
Pro Vercelli Team Logo

Pro Vercelli

19 11 58%
9
SPAL Team Logo

SPAL

18 5 28%
10
Spezia Team Logo

Spezia

18 12 67%
11
Trapani Team Logo

Trapani

19 11 58%
12
Virtus Lanciano Team Logo

Virtus Lanciano

19 10 53%
13
Como Team Logo

Como

17 12 71%
14
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

17 7 41%
15
Cremonese Team Logo

Cremonese

18 7 39%
16
Südtirol Team Logo

Südtirol

17 12 71%
17
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

18 8 44%
18
Triestina Team Logo

Triestina

18 9 50%
19
Prato Team Logo

Prato

18 6 33%
20
Bassano Virtus Team Logo

Bassano Virtus

17 8 47%
21
FeralpiSalò Team Logo

FeralpiSalò

17 6 35%
22
Reggiana Team Logo

Reggiana

17 8 47%
23
Monza Team Logo

Monza

18 9 50%
24
Carrarese Team Logo

Carrarese

17 9 53%
25
Siracusa Team Logo

Siracusa

18 10 56%
26
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

18 8 44%
27
Lumezzane Team Logo

Lumezzane

17 4 24%
28
Pavia Team Logo

Pavia

18 13 72%
29
Barletta Team Logo

Barletta

17 12 71%
30
Viareggio Team Logo

Viareggio

18 6 33%
31
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

17 5 29%
32
Pergocrema Team Logo

Pergocrema

17 7 41%
33
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

17 6 35%
34
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

18 6 33%
35
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

17 7 41%
36
Andria BAT Team Logo

Andria BAT

17 9 53%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Taranto and Como have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie C.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 36 matches played in the Serie C, Taranto has scored and conceded goals in 14 matches. In other words, 39% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 33% at home, while it is 44% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Como has scored and conceded in 22 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie C, giving them a BTTS rate of 65%. Both teams have scored in 10 of Como’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 12 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets