Favourite this Match
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

BTTS: Suzhou Dongwu 0 - 0 Guangxi Baoyun

Sat, 05 April 2025 - 07:00

Finished

Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

25 15 60%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

25 10 40%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

24 11 46%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

24 16 67%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

25 16 64%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

24 8 33%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

23 8 35%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

25 9 36%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

24 15 63%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

25 14 56%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

25 9 36%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

24 12 50%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

23 13 57%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

24 15 63%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

24 12 50%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

24 17 71%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

12 8 67%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

13 5 38%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

12 6 50%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

12 8 67%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

12 8 67%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

13 6 46%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

11 2 18%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

12 4 33%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

12 8 67%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

13 9 69%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

13 3 23%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

12 7 58%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

12 6 50%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

12 8 67%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

11 3 27%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

12 9 75%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

13 7 54%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

12 5 42%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

12 5 42%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

12 8 67%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

13 8 62%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

11 2 18%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

12 6 50%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

13 5 38%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

12 7 58%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

12 5 42%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

12 6 50%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

12 5 42%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

11 7 64%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

12 7 58%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

13 9 69%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

12 8 67%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Suzhou Dongwu and Guangxi Baoyun have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 23 matches played in the China League One, Suzhou Dongwu has scored and conceded goals in 8 matches. In other words, 35% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 18% at home, while it is 50% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Guangxi Baoyun has scored and conceded in 11 of their 24 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 46%. Both teams have scored in 6 of Guangxi Baoyun’s 12 home matches, and it has happened 5 times in 12 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets