# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF |
32 | 19 | 59% |
2 |
![]() Sporting Covilhã |
32 | 17 | 53% |
3 |
![]() Sporting CP II |
28 | 10 | 36% |
4 |
![]() Varzim |
32 | 12 | 38% |
5 |
![]() Sporting Braga II |
32 | 13 | 41% |
6 |
![]() Canelas 2010 |
28 | 14 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Felgueiras 1932 |
32 | 12 | 38% |
8 |
![]() Sanjoanense |
28 | 18 | 64% |
9 |
![]() Caldas |
28 | 21 | 75% |
10 |
![]() CD Trofense |
28 | 15 | 54% |
11 |
![]() Pêro Pinheiro |
28 | 14 | 50% |
12 |
![]() 1 Dezembro |
28 | 10 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Anadia |
28 | 12 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Fafe |
28 | 9 | 32% |
15 |
![]() Lusitania Lourosa |
32 | 17 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Oliveira Hospital |
28 | 12 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Vianense |
28 | 12 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Atlético CP |
32 | 18 | 56% |
19 |
![]() Alverca |
32 | 17 | 53% |
20 |
![]() Amora |
28 | 12 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF |
16 | 6 | 38% |
2 |
![]() Sporting Covilhã |
16 | 9 | 56% |
3 |
![]() Sporting CP II |
14 | 6 | 43% |
4 |
![]() Varzim |
16 | 7 | 44% |
5 |
![]() Sporting Braga II |
16 | 7 | 44% |
6 |
![]() Canelas 2010 |
14 | 8 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Felgueiras 1932 |
16 | 5 | 31% |
8 |
![]() Sanjoanense |
14 | 8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Caldas |
14 | 11 | 79% |
10 |
![]() CD Trofense |
14 | 6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() Pêro Pinheiro |
14 | 9 | 64% |
12 |
![]() 1 Dezembro |
14 | 5 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Anadia |
14 | 6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Fafe |
14 | 5 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Lusitania Lourosa |
16 | 10 | 63% |
16 |
![]() Oliveira Hospital |
14 | 7 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Vianense |
14 | 6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Atlético CP |
16 | 6 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Alverca |
16 | 7 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Amora |
14 | 8 | 57% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF |
16 | 13 | 81% |
2 |
![]() Sporting Covilhã |
16 | 8 | 50% |
3 |
![]() Sporting CP II |
14 | 4 | 29% |
4 |
![]() Varzim |
16 | 5 | 31% |
5 |
![]() Sporting Braga II |
16 | 6 | 38% |
6 |
![]() Canelas 2010 |
14 | 6 | 43% |
7 |
![]() Felgueiras 1932 |
16 | 7 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Sanjoanense |
14 | 10 | 71% |
9 |
![]() Caldas |
14 | 10 | 71% |
10 |
![]() CD Trofense |
14 | 9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Pêro Pinheiro |
14 | 5 | 36% |
12 |
![]() 1 Dezembro |
14 | 5 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Anadia |
14 | 6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Fafe |
14 | 4 | 29% |
15 |
![]() Lusitania Lourosa |
16 | 7 | 44% |
16 |
![]() Oliveira Hospital |
14 | 5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Vianense |
14 | 6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Atlético CP |
16 | 12 | 75% |
19 |
![]() Alverca |
16 | 10 | 63% |
20 |
![]() Amora |
14 | 4 | 29% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Sporting CP II and 1 Dezembro have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Liga 3.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.