Favourite this Match

Sichuan Jiuniu 1 - 0 Tianjin Teda

01.05.2025 - 06:30

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

22 19 86%
2
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

22 17 77%
3
Hangzhou Team Logo

Hangzhou

23 15 65%
4
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

21 14 67%
5
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

22 12 55%
6
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

22 15 68%
7
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

22 14 64%
8
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

23 13 57%
9
Meizhou Hakka Team Logo

Meizhou Hakka

22 15 68%
10
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

22 9 41%
11
Wuhan Three Towns Team Logo

Wuhan Three Towns

21 14 67%
12
Chengdu Better City FC Team Logo

Chengdu Better City FC

22 12 55%
13
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

22 13 59%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

22 13 59%
15
Dalian Zhixing Team Logo

Dalian Zhixing

22 7 32%
16
Yunnan Yukun Team Logo

Yunnan Yukun

22 16 73%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

12 10 83%
2
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

11 10 91%
3
Hangzhou Team Logo

Hangzhou

12 9 75%
4
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

10 7 70%
5
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

12 6 50%
6
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

11 6 55%
7
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

10 7 70%
8
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

10 4 40%
9
Meizhou Hakka Team Logo

Meizhou Hakka

11 8 73%
10
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

11 5 45%
11
Wuhan Three Towns Team Logo

Wuhan Three Towns

11 7 64%
12
Chengdu Better City FC Team Logo

Chengdu Better City FC

11 5 45%
13
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

11 9 82%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

11 6 55%
15
Dalian Zhixing Team Logo

Dalian Zhixing

11 2 18%
16
Yunnan Yukun Team Logo

Yunnan Yukun

11 8 73%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

10 9 90%
2
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

11 7 64%
3
Hangzhou Team Logo

Hangzhou

11 6 55%
4
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

11 7 64%
5
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

10 6 60%
6
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

11 9 82%
7
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

12 7 58%
8
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

13 9 69%
9
Meizhou Hakka Team Logo

Meizhou Hakka

11 7 64%
10
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

11 4 36%
11
Wuhan Three Towns Team Logo

Wuhan Three Towns

10 7 70%
12
Chengdu Better City FC Team Logo

Chengdu Better City FC

11 7 64%
13
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

11 4 36%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

11 7 64%
15
Dalian Zhixing Team Logo

Dalian Zhixing

11 5 45%
16
Yunnan Yukun Team Logo

Yunnan Yukun

11 8 73%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Sichuan Jiuniu and Tianjin Teda have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Chinese Super League.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 22 matches played in the Chinese Super League, Sichuan Jiuniu has scored and conceded goals in 13 matches. In other words, 59% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 82% at home, while it is 36% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Tianjin Teda has scored and conceded in 13 of their 23 matches so far in the Chinese Super League, giving them a BTTS rate of 57%. Both teams have scored in 4 of Tianjin Teda’s 10 home matches, and it has happened 9 times in 13 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets