# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
30 | 77% | 67% | 47% |
2 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 73% | 57% | 30% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
30 | 70% | 50% | 40% |
4 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
30 | 67% | 47% | 23% |
5 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
30 | 67% | 40% | 23% |
6 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
30 | 67% | 47% | 30% |
7 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
30 | 63% | 43% | 30% |
8 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 63% | 53% | 40% |
9 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
30 | 63% | 43% | 27% |
10 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
30 | 60% | 27% | 20% |
11 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 57% | 43% | 23% |
12 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
30 | 57% | 53% | 33% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
30 | 53% | 40% | 20% |
14 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
30 | 53% | 27% | 10% |
15 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
30 | 50% | 43% | 33% |
16 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 40% | 27% | 17% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
30 | 73% | 50% | 27% |
2 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
30 | 73% | 43% | 33% |
3 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 70% | 37% | 10% |
4 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
30 | 67% | 43% | 17% |
5 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
30 | 67% | 43% | 7% |
6 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
30 | 67% | 53% | 23% |
7 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
30 | 63% | 37% | 17% |
8 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 63% | 37% | 30% |
9 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 63% | 43% | 37% |
10 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
30 | 63% | 33% | 20% |
11 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
30 | 60% | 33% | 13% |
12 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
30 | 60% | 27% | 10% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
30 | 50% | 20% | 13% |
14 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 47% | 27% | 17% |
15 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
30 | 43% | 30% | 23% |
16 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
30 | 43% | 17% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
30 | 80% | 47% | 30% |
2 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
30 | 73% | 40% | 17% |
3 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
30 | 70% | 50% | 27% |
4 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 67% | 40% | 17% |
5 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
30 | 67% | 37% | 20% |
6 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
30 | 67% | 27% | 7% |
7 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
30 | 63% | 33% | 13% |
8 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
30 | 63% | 33% | 13% |
9 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
30 | 60% | 40% | 10% |
10 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
30 | 60% | 50% | 27% |
11 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
30 | 60% | 37% | 23% |
12 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
30 | 57% | 33% | 27% |
13 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 57% | 27% | 17% |
14 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
30 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 47% | 30% | 20% |
16 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 33% | 20% | 10% |
Check out all the card statistics for Sichuan Jiuniu vs Shanghai SIPG here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Sichuan Jiuniu vs Shanghai SIPG bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Chinese Super League, just check out the table above.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.