17.03.2019 - 07:30
Stadium : Jinshan Soccer Stadium
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liaoning Kaixin | 30 | 60% | 33% | 23% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 47% | 27% | 23% |
3 | Hangzhou | 30 | 60% | 47% | 37% |
4 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 67% | 43% | 27% |
5 | Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 40% | 27% | 17% |
6 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 30 | 80% | 67% | 47% |
7 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 27% | 23% | 13% |
8 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 37% | 20% | 10% |
9 | Beijing BG | 30 | 30% | 17% | 3% |
10 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 57% | 43% | 30% |
11 | Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 50% | 33% | 23% |
12 | Meizhou Meixian Techand | 30 | 53% | 30% | 13% |
13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 47% | 33% | 23% |
14 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 30 | 57% | 43% | 27% |
15 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 50% | 33% | 20% |
16 | Sichuan Longfor | 30 | 53% | 27% | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liaoning Kaixin | 30 | 57% | 23% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 47% | 27% | 17% |
3 | Hangzhou | 30 | 67% | 47% | 17% |
4 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 50% | 20% | 7% |
5 | Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 40% | 27% | 7% |
6 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 30 | 77% | 43% | 30% |
7 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 40% | 27% | 20% |
8 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 50% | 27% | 3% |
9 | Beijing BG | 30 | 43% | 7% | 0% |
10 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 63% | 53% | 27% |
11 | Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 70% | 27% | 7% |
12 | Meizhou Meixian Techand | 30 | 53% | 30% | 3% |
13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 60% | 30% | 3% |
14 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 30 | 67% | 47% | 27% |
15 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 50% | 37% | 13% |
16 | Sichuan Longfor | 30 | 63% | 23% | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liaoning Kaixin | 30 | 63% | 37% | 23% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 57% | 27% | 10% |
3 | Hangzhou | 30 | 60% | 43% | 13% |
4 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 73% | 50% | 30% |
5 | Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 47% | 20% | 7% |
6 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 30 | 87% | 60% | 23% |
7 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 23% | 10% | 3% |
8 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 47% | 27% | 3% |
9 | Beijing BG | 30 | 53% | 17% | 3% |
10 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 53% | 17% | 10% |
11 | Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 57% | 30% | 20% |
12 | Meizhou Meixian Techand | 30 | 47% | 33% | 20% |
13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 50% | 33% | 13% |
14 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 30 | 50% | 30% | 17% |
15 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 67% | 37% | 7% |
16 | Sichuan Longfor | 30 | 63% | 23% | 3% |
Check out all the card statistics for Shanghai Shenxin vs Sichuan Longfor here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Shanghai Shenxin vs Sichuan Longfor bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the China League One, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.