Shandong Luneng 3 - 0 Meizhou Hakka
27.12.2022 - 07:00
Stadium: Jinan Olympic Sports Center Stadium
Finished
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 17 | 52% | 53% | 50% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 16 | 48% | 29% | 69% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 14 | 42% | 31% | 53% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 18 | 55% | 71% | 38% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 13 | 39% | 38% | 41% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 23 | 70% | 65% | 75% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 26 | 79% | 75% | 82% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 17 | 52% | 35% | 69% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 22 | 67% | 69% | 65% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 19 | 58% | 63% | 53% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 12 | 36% | 31% | 41% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 16 | 48% | 53% | 44% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 21 | 64% | 59% | 69% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 20 | 61% | 59% | 63% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 25 | 76% | 82% | 69% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 17 | 52% | 63% | 41% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 24 | 73% | 81% | 65% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 14 | 42% | 56% | 29% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 28 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 30 | 91% | 82% | 100% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 31 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 28 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 28 | 85% | 81% | 88% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 21 | 64% | 59% | 69% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 28 | 85% | 76% | 94% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 23 | 70% | 69% | 71% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 27 | 82% | 76% | 88% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 82% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 23 | 70% | 59% | 81% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 26 | 79% | 81% | 76% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 25 | 76% | 75% | 76% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 23 | 70% | 65% | 75% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 81% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 20 | 61% | 69% | 53% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 22 | 67% | 75% | 59% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 9 | 27% | 41% | 13% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 8 | 24% | 6% | 44% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 4 | 12% | 13% | 12% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 6 | 18% | 6% | 29% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 14 | 42% | 41% | 44% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 19 | 58% | 69% | 47% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 13 | 39% | 24% | 56% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 13 | 39% | 44% | 35% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 7 | 21% | 25% | 18% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 4 | 12% | 0% | 24% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 7 | 21% | 18% | 25% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 9 | 27% | 24% | 31% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 9 | 27% | 18% | 38% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 11 | 33% | 29% | 38% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 8 | 24% | 31% | 18% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 15 | 45% | 69% | 24% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 6 | 18% | 38% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 7 | 21% | 29% | 13% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 7 | 21% | 0% | 44% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 3 | 9% | 12% | 6% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 6 | 18% | 18% | 19% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 12 | 36% | 38% | 35% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 8 | 24% | 25% | 24% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 5 | 15% | 19% | 12% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 5 | 15% | 6% | 25% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 13% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 6 | 18% | 6% | 31% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 19% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 5 | 15% | 25% | 6% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 9 | 27% | 56% | 0% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 3 | 9% | 19% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 4 | 12% | 18% | 6% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 19% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 6 | 18% | 25% | 12% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 19% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 3 | 9% | 13% | 6% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 5 | 15% | 31% | 0% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 16 | 48% | 47% | 50% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 17 | 52% | 71% | 31% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 19 | 58% | 69% | 47% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 15 | 45% | 29% | 63% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 20 | 61% | 63% | 59% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 10 | 30% | 35% | 25% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 7 | 21% | 25% | 18% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 16 | 48% | 65% | 31% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 11 | 33% | 31% | 35% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 14 | 42% | 38% | 47% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 21 | 64% | 69% | 59% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 17 | 52% | 47% | 56% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 12 | 36% | 41% | 31% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 13 | 39% | 41% | 38% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 8 | 24% | 18% | 31% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 16 | 48% | 38% | 59% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 9 | 27% | 19% | 35% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 19 | 58% | 44% | 71% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 13% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 3 | 9% | 18% | 0% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 13% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 5 | 15% | 19% | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 12 | 36% | 41% | 31% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 5 | 15% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 10 | 30% | 31% | 29% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 4 | 12% | 13% | 12% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 6 | 18% | 24% | 13% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 5 | 15% | 13% | 18% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 10 | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 7 | 21% | 19% | 24% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 8 | 24% | 25% | 24% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 10 | 30% | 35% | 25% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 13% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 19% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 13 | 39% | 31% | 47% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 11 | 33% | 25% | 41% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 24 | 73% | 59% | 88% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 25 | 76% | 94% | 56% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 27 | 82% | 94% | 71% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 19 | 58% | 59% | 56% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 14 | 42% | 31% | 53% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 20 | 61% | 76% | 44% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 20 | 61% | 56% | 65% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 26 | 79% | 75% | 82% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 29 | 88% | 100% | 76% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 26 | 79% | 82% | 75% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 24 | 73% | 76% | 69% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 24 | 73% | 82% | 63% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 22 | 67% | 71% | 63% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 25 | 76% | 69% | 82% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 18 | 55% | 31% | 76% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 27 | 82% | 63% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 26 | 79% | 71% | 88% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 26 | 79% | 100% | 56% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 30 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 27 | 82% | 82% | 81% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 21 | 64% | 63% | 65% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 25 | 76% | 75% | 76% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 28 | 85% | 81% | 88% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 28 | 85% | 94% | 75% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 27 | 82% | 94% | 69% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 81% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 28 | 85% | 75% | 94% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 24 | 73% | 44% | 100% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 30 | 91% | 81% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 29 | 88% | 82% | 94% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 30 | 91% | 100% | 81% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 27 | 82% | 75% | 88% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 30 | 91% | 100% | 81% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 30 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 28 | 85% | 69% | 100% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
You can check out how often Shandong Luneng and Meizhou Hakka matches in the Chinese Super League go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
91% of Shandong Luneng’s matches in the Chinese Super League have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 67%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Meizhou Hakka’s case, 39% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 48%.
You can also see whether Shandong Luneng and Meizhou Hakka matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in Chinese Super League.
The over/under goal analysis for Shandong Luneng vs Meizhou Hakka offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.