15.05.2022 - 10:00
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rende | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Aversa Normanna | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Cavese | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Portici | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Gelbison | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Biancavilla | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Castrovillari | 36 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
9 | FC Messina | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Licata | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Troina | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Sancataldese | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Città Di Sant’Agata | 36 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
14 | San Luca | 36 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Santa Maria Cilento | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Paternò | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Giarre | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Cittanova Interpiana | 36 | 11% | 11% | 8% |
19 | Lamezia Terme | 36 | 6% | 6% | 3% |
20 | Trapani 1905 | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rende | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Aversa Normanna | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Cavese | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Portici | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Gelbison | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Biancavilla | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Castrovillari | 36 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
9 | FC Messina | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Licata | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Troina | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Sancataldese | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Città Di Sant’Agata | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
14 | San Luca | 36 | 6% | 3% | 3% |
15 | Santa Maria Cilento | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Paternò | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Giarre | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Cittanova Interpiana | 36 | 14% | 14% | 8% |
19 | Lamezia Terme | 36 | 6% | 3% | 3% |
20 | Trapani 1905 | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rende | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Aversa Normanna | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Cavese | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Portici | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Gelbison | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Biancavilla | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Castrovillari | 36 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
9 | FC Messina | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Licata | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Troina | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Sancataldese | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Città Di Sant’Agata | 36 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
14 | San Luca | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Santa Maria Cilento | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Paternò | 36 | 6% | 6% | 3% |
17 | Giarre | 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Cittanova Interpiana | 36 | 14% | 6% | 6% |
19 | Lamezia Terme | 36 | 6% | 6% | 3% |
20 | Trapani 1905 | 36 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Sancataldese vs Lamezia Terme here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Sancataldese vs Lamezia Terme bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D Group I, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.