Corners: Roasso Kumamoto 0 - 2 Shimizu S-Pulse

Sun, 03 April 2016 - 00:00

Stadium: Egao Kenko Stadium

Finished

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Kyoto Sanga	43	74%	67%	60%	47%	33%	21%	16%	10.57
2	Yokohama	42	83%	71%	48%	40%	26%	12%	7%	9.9
3	Machida Zelvia	42	71%	60%	40%	36%	31%	29%	21%	9.87
4	Mito Hollyhock	42	71%	55%	48%	31%	21%	14%	12%	9.82
5	Montedio Yamagata	42	69%	55%	36%	33%	33%	21%	14%	9.82
6	Cerezo Osaka	44	73%	59%	50%	30%	20%	16%	11%	9.78
7	Ehime	42	62%	52%	40%	31%	26%	19%	17%	9.7
8	Tokushima Vortis	42	62%	50%	43%	36%	31%	21%	12%	9.7
9	Renofa Yamaguchi	42	60%	55%	45%	31%	21%	19%	14%	9.54
10	Roasso Kumamoto	42	60%	52%	45%	33%	21%	12%	10%	9.34
11	Giravanz Kitakyushu	42	69%	62%	50%	38%	19%	7%	5%	9.29
12	Zweigen Kanazawa	42	55%	50%	38%	31%	29%	26%	10%	9.19
13	Tokyo Verdy	42	67%	50%	33%	24%	14%	14%	10%	9.11
14	Fagiano Okayama	44	70%	59%	36%	25%	20%	14%	5%	9.03
15	Gifu	42	62%	57%	38%	21%	21%	17%	12%	9.03
16	Matsumoto Yamaga	43	67%	56%	47%	28%	21%	9%	5%	9.02
17	JEF United	42	62%	55%	45%	29%	14%	10%	5%	8.83
18	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	42	57%	50%	40%	24%	17%	12%	7%	8.82
19	Consadole Sapporo	42	60%	45%	33%	29%	19%	14%	7%	8.8
20	Shimizu S-Pulse	42	62%	45%	40%	26%	14%	10%	7%	8.74
21	Kamatamare Sanuki	42	52%	43%	31%	19%	12%	7%	5%	8.38
22	V-Varen Nagasaki	42	55%	48%	29%	17%	12%	2%	2%	8.36

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Kyoto Sanga	21	71%	67%	67%	52%	33%	19%	14%	10.65
2	Cerezo Osaka	23	78%	61%	57%	43%	30%	26%	17%	10.48
3	Yokohama	21	86%	81%	48%	43%	24%	10%	5%	10.15
4	Montedio Yamagata	21	76%	62%	38%	33%	33%	24%	10%	10.11
5	Renofa Yamaguchi	21	67%	57%	43%	33%	24%	19%	14%	10.11
6	Tokushima Vortis	21	57%	48%	43%	33%	29%	19%	14%	9.89
7	Tokyo Verdy	21	71%	52%	38%	33%	19%	19%	14%	9.65
8	Roasso Kumamoto	21	57%	52%	43%	29%	14%	10%	10%	9.59
9	Gifu	21	71%	67%	52%	33%	33%	24%	14%	9.57
10	Shimizu S-Pulse	21	71%	62%	57%	38%	19%	14%	10%	9.53
11	Zweigen Kanazawa	21	62%	57%	43%	33%	29%	29%	14%	9.3
12	Matsumoto Yamaga	22	64%	59%	41%	32%	27%	9%	9%	9.13
13	Ehime	21	52%	48%	33%	24%	19%	10%	5%	9
14	Giravanz Kitakyushu	21	71%	62%	57%	38%	19%	5%	5%	9
15	Machida Zelvia	21	67%	52%	33%	29%	24%	19%	10%	8.95
16	Mito Hollyhock	21	67%	43%	43%	24%	14%	5%	5%	8.9
17	Kamatamare Sanuki	21	48%	38%	29%	24%	19%	14%	10%	8.88
18	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	21	52%	48%	38%	24%	19%	14%	10%	8.67
19	Consadole Sapporo	21	57%	33%	19%	14%	14%	10%	5%	8.5
20	V-Varen Nagasaki	21	67%	52%	29%	10%	10%	5%	5%	8.48
21	Fagiano Okayama	21	57%	48%	24%	14%	14%	14%	5%	8.14
22	JEF United	21	52%	48%	43%	19%	10%	10%	10%	8.14

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Mito Hollyhock	21	76%	67%	52%	38%	29%	24%	19%	10.78
2	Machida Zelvia	21	76%	67%	48%	43%	38%	38%	33%	10.76
3	Kyoto Sanga	22	77%	68%	55%	41%	32%	23%	18%	10.5
4	Ehime	21	71%	57%	48%	38%	33%	29%	29%	10.3
5	Fagiano Okayama	23	83%	70%	48%	35%	26%	13%	4%	9.87
6	Yokohama	21	81%	62%	48%	38%	29%	14%	10%	9.66
7	Giravanz Kitakyushu	21	67%	62%	43%	38%	19%	10%	5%	9.65
8	JEF United	21	71%	62%	48%	38%	19%	10%	0%	9.58
9	Montedio Yamagata	21	62%	48%	33%	33%	33%	19%	19%	9.55
10	Tokushima Vortis	21	67%	52%	43%	38%	33%	24%	10%	9.55
11	Roasso Kumamoto	21	62%	52%	48%	38%	29%	14%	10%	9.14
12	Consadole Sapporo	21	62%	57%	48%	43%	24%	19%	10%	9.1
13	Zweigen Kanazawa	21	48%	43%	33%	29%	29%	24%	5%	9.06
14	Renofa Yamaguchi	21	52%	52%	48%	29%	19%	19%	14%	9
15	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	21	62%	52%	43%	24%	14%	10%	5%	9
16	Cerezo Osaka	21	67%	57%	43%	14%	10%	5%	5%	8.94
17	Matsumoto Yamaga	21	71%	52%	52%	24%	14%	10%	0%	8.9
18	Tokyo Verdy	21	62%	48%	29%	14%	10%	10%	5%	8.55
19	Gifu	21	52%	48%	24%	10%	10%	10%	10%	8.42
20	V-Varen Nagasaki	21	43%	43%	29%	24%	14%	0%	0%	8.22
21	Kamatamare Sanuki	21	57%	48%	33%	14%	5%	0%	0%	8
22	Shimizu S-Pulse	21	52%	29%	24%	14%	10%	5%	5%	7.95

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Kyoto Sanga	43	91%	77%	60%	44%	40%	28%	21%	5.95
2	Machida Zelvia	42	79%	71%	57%	48%	33%	24%	17%	5.46
3	Matsumoto Yamaga	43	88%	74%	58%	44%	37%	21%	9%	5.3
4	Cerezo Osaka	44	80%	73%	59%	36%	25%	16%	14%	5.21
5	Renofa Yamaguchi	42	74%	64%	43%	33%	21%	21%	14%	5.13
6	Ehime	42	69%	57%	57%	38%	19%	10%	7%	5.11
7	Tokyo Verdy	42	83%	69%	52%	36%	21%	17%	10%	5.03
8	Montedio Yamagata	42	79%	69%	48%	43%	21%	12%	5%	4.9
9	Mito Hollyhock	42	86%	69%	48%	29%	14%	12%	7%	4.87
10	Zweigen Kanazawa	42	71%	62%	45%	19%	12%	10%	7%	4.68
11	Consadole Sapporo	42	74%	67%	52%	33%	17%	12%	5%	4.63
12	Tokushima Vortis	42	71%	62%	48%	33%	17%	10%	2%	4.62
13	Shimizu S-Pulse	42	83%	57%	43%	29%	19%	12%	10%	4.62
14	JEF United	42	74%	67%	48%	33%	14%	14%	7%	4.55
15	Yokohama	42	76%	55%	43%	29%	21%	14%	10%	4.51
16	Giravanz Kitakyushu	42	67%	64%	48%	24%	12%	10%	0%	4.32
17	Fagiano Okayama	44	77%	57%	32%	18%	16%	14%	7%	4.26
18	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	42	64%	50%	38%	21%	17%	10%	7%	4.08
19	Gifu	42	74%	60%	38%	19%	10%	2%	0%	3.95
20	V-Varen Nagasaki	42	60%	48%	33%	26%	14%	7%	5%	3.92
21	Kamatamare Sanuki	42	57%	36%	21%	17%	14%	7%	5%	3.57
22	Roasso Kumamoto	42	62%	43%	24%	10%	7%	2%	0%	3.42

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Kyoto Sanga	21	95%	76%	62%	48%	48%	29%	24%	6.4
2	Matsumoto Yamaga	22	91%	82%	68%	50%	41%	32%	18%	5.86
3	Cerezo Osaka	23	91%	83%	74%	39%	26%	22%	17%	5.65
4	Tokyo Verdy	21	86%	67%	48%	43%	24%	19%	14%	5.3
5	Renofa Yamaguchi	21	71%	57%	33%	29%	19%	19%	14%	5.16
6	Yokohama	21	86%	62%	52%	33%	29%	24%	14%	5.15
7	Ehime	21	62%	52%	52%	43%	14%	10%	10%	5.12
8	Machida Zelvia	21	76%	71%	57%	38%	29%	19%	10%	5.1
9	Shimizu S-Pulse	21	90%	62%	48%	38%	19%	14%	10%	4.86
10	Mito Hollyhock	21	90%	71%	52%	29%	14%	10%	10%	4.85
11	Montedio Yamagata	21	71%	67%	43%	38%	14%	14%	5%	4.74
12	Tokushima Vortis	21	71%	62%	43%	33%	10%	5%	5%	4.71
13	Zweigen Kanazawa	21	71%	62%	43%	19%	14%	10%	10%	4.55
14	Consadole Sapporo	21	81%	67%	48%	24%	10%	5%	0%	4.4
15	Giravanz Kitakyushu	21	76%	71%	48%	33%	14%	10%	0%	4.38
16	Kamatamare Sanuki	21	52%	38%	24%	24%	24%	10%	5%	4.19
17	JEF United	21	71%	57%	43%	29%	10%	10%	10%	4.14
18	Gifu	21	81%	71%	48%	19%	5%	0%	0%	4.14
19	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	21	71%	57%	38%	19%	14%	5%	5%	4
20	V-Varen Nagasaki	21	71%	57%	38%	24%	10%	0%	0%	3.86
21	Roasso Kumamoto	21	52%	43%	29%	10%	10%	0%	0%	3.65
22	Fagiano Okayama	21	67%	38%	14%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.33

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Machida Zelvia	21	81%	71%	57%	57%	38%	29%	24%	5.81
2	Kyoto Sanga	22	86%	77%	59%	41%	32%	27%	18%	5.55
3	Fagiano Okayama	23	87%	74%	48%	30%	26%	22%	9%	5.14
4	Ehime	21	76%	62%	62%	33%	24%	10%	5%	5.1
5	Renofa Yamaguchi	21	76%	71%	52%	38%	24%	24%	14%	5.1
6	Montedio Yamagata	21	86%	71%	52%	48%	29%	10%	5%	5.05
7	JEF United	21	76%	76%	52%	38%	19%	19%	5%	5
8	Mito Hollyhock	21	81%	67%	43%	29%	14%	14%	5%	4.89
9	Consadole Sapporo	21	67%	67%	57%	43%	24%	19%	10%	4.86
10	Zweigen Kanazawa	21	71%	62%	48%	19%	10%	10%	5%	4.82
11	Tokyo Verdy	21	81%	71%	57%	29%	19%	14%	5%	4.75
12	Matsumoto Yamaga	21	86%	67%	48%	38%	33%	10%	0%	4.71
13	Cerezo Osaka	21	67%	62%	43%	33%	24%	10%	10%	4.68
14	Tokushima Vortis	21	71%	62%	52%	33%	24%	14%	0%	4.55
15	Shimizu S-Pulse	21	76%	52%	38%	19%	19%	10%	10%	4.38
16	Giravanz Kitakyushu	21	57%	57%	48%	14%	10%	10%	0%	4.24
17	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	21	57%	43%	38%	24%	19%	14%	10%	4.17
18	V-Varen Nagasaki	21	48%	38%	29%	29%	19%	14%	10%	4
19	Yokohama	21	67%	48%	33%	24%	14%	5%	5%	3.9
20	Gifu	21	67%	48%	29%	19%	14%	5%	0%	3.74
21	Roasso Kumamoto	21	71%	43%	19%	10%	5%	5%	0%	3.24
22	Kamatamare Sanuki	21	62%	33%	19%	10%	5%	5%	5%	3.1

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Roasso Kumamoto	42	81%	71%	50%	43%	36%	26%	19%	5.92
2	Yokohama	42	86%	79%	57%	45%	26%	24%	14%	5.39
3	Tokushima Vortis	42	69%	64%	57%	33%	21%	17%	10%	5.08
4	Gifu	42	74%	67%	52%	45%	31%	17%	7%	5.08
5	Giravanz Kitakyushu	42	71%	67%	48%	33%	26%	17%	10%	4.97
6	Mito Hollyhock	42	83%	60%	50%	40%	21%	12%	10%	4.95
7	Montedio Yamagata	42	79%	64%	52%	31%	21%	14%	7%	4.92
8	Kamatamare Sanuki	42	74%	60%	40%	33%	21%	17%	7%	4.81
9	Fagiano Okayama	44	75%	66%	50%	41%	18%	11%	2%	4.77
10	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	42	74%	64%	50%	36%	21%	12%	7%	4.74
11	Kyoto Sanga	43	74%	60%	44%	23%	16%	14%	12%	4.62
12	Ehime	42	71%	55%	40%	26%	19%	14%	10%	4.59
13	Cerezo Osaka	44	77%	64%	43%	34%	18%	9%	2%	4.57
14	Zweigen Kanazawa	42	60%	57%	38%	26%	19%	14%	10%	4.51
15	V-Varen Nagasaki	42	79%	62%	45%	21%	12%	7%	5%	4.44
16	Renofa Yamaguchi	42	79%	55%	38%	21%	14%	12%	7%	4.41
17	Machida Zelvia	42	69%	57%	48%	26%	19%	12%	7%	4.41
18	JEF United	42	76%	62%	33%	21%	12%	7%	2%	4.28
19	Consadole Sapporo	42	74%	55%	31%	21%	14%	12%	12%	4.17
20	Shimizu S-Pulse	42	67%	52%	43%	24%	21%	12%	5%	4.12
21	Tokyo Verdy	42	79%	60%	45%	17%	5%	2%	2%	4.08
22	Matsumoto Yamaga	43	70%	51%	40%	19%	9%	2%	2%	3.72

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Roasso Kumamoto	21	71%	67%	52%	38%	38%	24%	19%	5.94
2	Gifu	21	81%	71%	62%	57%	43%	24%	10%	5.43
3	Montedio Yamagata	21	86%	67%	57%	38%	29%	19%	5%	5.37
4	Tokushima Vortis	21	57%	52%	52%	33%	19%	19%	14%	5.18
5	Yokohama	21	86%	76%	52%	38%	19%	19%	5%	5
6	Renofa Yamaguchi	21	81%	57%	43%	33%	24%	19%	10%	4.95
7	Cerezo Osaka	23	87%	74%	52%	39%	17%	13%	0%	4.83
8	Fagiano Okayama	21	67%	57%	57%	43%	24%	14%	5%	4.81
9	Zweigen Kanazawa	21	62%	62%	38%	29%	24%	19%	14%	4.75
10	Kamatamare Sanuki	21	52%	43%	38%	33%	19%	14%	10%	4.69
11	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	21	76%	71%	52%	38%	24%	10%	10%	4.67
12	Shimizu S-Pulse	21	71%	62%	52%	33%	29%	14%	10%	4.67
13	Giravanz Kitakyushu	21	71%	67%	48%	38%	29%	19%	5%	4.62
14	V-Varen Nagasaki	21	86%	71%	52%	19%	14%	14%	10%	4.62
15	Tokyo Verdy	21	86%	67%	43%	14%	5%	5%	5%	4.35
16	Kyoto Sanga	21	67%	48%	33%	19%	19%	14%	10%	4.25
17	Consadole Sapporo	21	71%	57%	33%	24%	14%	10%	10%	4.1
18	Mito Hollyhock	21	81%	48%	29%	24%	14%	5%	5%	4.05
19	JEF United	21	81%	67%	29%	14%	10%	5%	0%	4
20	Ehime	21	62%	43%	33%	14%	10%	10%	0%	3.88
21	Machida Zelvia	21	57%	52%	43%	24%	19%	10%	0%	3.85
22	Matsumoto Yamaga	22	59%	45%	32%	14%	5%	0%	0%	3.27

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Roasso Kumamoto	21	90%	76%	48%	48%	33%	29%	19%	5.9
2	Mito Hollyhock	21	86%	71%	71%	57%	29%	19%	14%	5.89
3	Yokohama	21	86%	81%	62%	52%	33%	29%	24%	5.76
4	Giravanz Kitakyushu	21	71%	67%	48%	29%	24%	14%	14%	5.41
5	Ehime	21	81%	67%	48%	38%	29%	19%	19%	5.2
6	Tokushima Vortis	21	81%	76%	62%	33%	24%	14%	5%	5
7	Kyoto Sanga	22	82%	73%	55%	27%	14%	14%	14%	4.95
8	Machida Zelvia	21	81%	62%	52%	29%	19%	14%	14%	4.95
9	Kamatamare Sanuki	21	95%	76%	43%	33%	24%	19%	5%	4.9
10	ThespaKusatsu Gunma	21	71%	57%	48%	33%	19%	14%	5%	4.83
11	Fagiano Okayama	23	83%	74%	43%	39%	13%	9%	0%	4.73
12	Gifu	21	67%	62%	43%	33%	19%	10%	5%	4.68
13	JEF United	21	71%	57%	38%	29%	14%	10%	5%	4.58
14	Montedio Yamagata	21	71%	62%	48%	24%	14%	10%	10%	4.5
15	Cerezo Osaka	21	67%	52%	33%	29%	19%	5%	5%	4.26
16	Consadole Sapporo	21	76%	52%	29%	19%	14%	14%	14%	4.24
17	Zweigen Kanazawa	21	57%	52%	38%	24%	14%	10%	5%	4.24
18	V-Varen Nagasaki	21	71%	52%	38%	24%	10%	0%	0%	4.22
19	Matsumoto Yamaga	21	81%	57%	48%	24%	14%	5%	5%	4.19
20	Renofa Yamaguchi	21	76%	52%	33%	10%	5%	5%	5%	3.9
21	Tokyo Verdy	21	71%	52%	48%	19%	5%	0%	0%	3.8
22	Shimizu S-Pulse	21	62%	43%	33%	14%	14%	10%	0%	3.57

The average number of corners for Roasso Kumamoto vs Shimizu S-Pulse can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.

Matches involving Roasso Kumamoto have averaged 9.34 corners per match during this J2 League campaign. They have taken 3.42 corners per match, while they concede an average of 5.92 to their opponents.

As for their upcoming opponent, Shimizu S-Pulse, their corner stats are the following:

Average number of corners in matches involving Shimizu S-Pulse: 8.74
Average number of corners in favour: 4.62
Average number of corners conceded: 4.12

Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Roasso Kumamoto vs Shimizu S-Pulse. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.

Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.

Previous Match

Next Match