Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG
17.10.2025 - 06:00
Stadium: Qingdao Tiantai Stadium
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 13 | 76% | 67% | 88% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 12 | 75% | 100% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 12 | 71% | 88% | 56% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 11 | 65% | 56% | 75% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 11 | 69% | 63% | 75% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 11 | 65% | 50% | 78% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 13 | 81% | 100% | 57% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 10 | 59% | 67% | 50% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 10 | 59% | 38% | 78% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 8 | 47% | 44% | 50% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 5 | 31% | 25% | 38% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 9 | 53% | 43% | 60% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 16 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 15 | 88% | 78% | 100% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 15 | 88% | 100% | 80% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 12 | 75% | 100% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 89% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 14 | 82% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 13 | 76% | 63% | 89% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 86% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 11 | 69% | 75% | 63% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 14 | 82% | 75% | 89% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 12 | 71% | 67% | 75% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 13 | 76% | 86% | 70% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 9 | 53% | 33% | 75% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 9 | 56% | 88% | 25% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 8 | 47% | 63% | 33% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 4 | 24% | 11% | 38% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 8 | 50% | 63% | 38% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 5 | 29% | 38% | 22% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 9 | 56% | 67% | 43% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 7 | 41% | 56% | 25% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 5 | 29% | 13% | 44% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 7 | 41% | 44% | 38% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 7 | 41% | 29% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 3 | 18% | 0% | 38% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 3 | 18% | 13% | 22% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 2 | 12% | 13% | 11% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 2 | 12% | 13% | 11% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 3 | 18% | 22% | 13% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 4 | 24% | 29% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 2 | 12% | 13% | 11% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 2 | 12% | 22% | 0% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 10% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 4 | 24% | 33% | 13% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 5 | 29% | 13% | 44% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 6 | 35% | 44% | 25% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 5 | 31% | 38% | 25% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 6 | 35% | 50% | 22% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 3 | 19% | 0% | 43% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 7 | 41% | 33% | 50% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 7 | 41% | 63% | 22% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 9 | 53% | 56% | 50% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 11 | 69% | 75% | 63% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 8 | 47% | 57% | 40% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 2 | 12% | 22% | 0% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 2 | 12% | 0% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 3 | 18% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 4 | 24% | 38% | 11% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 14% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 5 | 31% | 25% | 38% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 3 | 18% | 25% | 11% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 5 | 29% | 33% | 25% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 4 | 24% | 14% | 30% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 8 | 47% | 67% | 25% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 7 | 44% | 13% | 75% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 9 | 53% | 38% | 67% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 13 | 76% | 89% | 63% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 8 | 50% | 38% | 63% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 12 | 71% | 63% | 78% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 7 | 44% | 33% | 57% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 10 | 59% | 44% | 75% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 12 | 71% | 88% | 56% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 10 | 59% | 56% | 63% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 10 | 59% | 71% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 14 | 82% | 100% | 63% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 14 | 82% | 88% | 78% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 15 | 88% | 88% | 89% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 16 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 15 | 88% | 88% | 89% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 14 | 82% | 78% | 88% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 13 | 76% | 71% | 80% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 15 | 88% | 88% | 89% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 89% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 16 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 15 | 88% | 78% | 100% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 90% |
You can check out how often Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai SIPG matches in the Chinese Super League go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
69% of Qingdao Jonoon’s matches in the Chinese Super League have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 38%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Shanghai SIPG’s case, 0% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 24%.
You can also see whether Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai SIPG matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in Chinese Super League.
The over/under goal analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.