# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
19 | 70% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 62% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
15 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
15 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
15 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
14 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
12 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 46% |
11 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
12 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 44% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 41% |
18 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 41% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
10 | 37% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 30% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 54% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 54% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 31% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 8% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
19 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
19 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
17 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 61% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
17 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Lexington |
16 | 59% |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 59% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
16 | 59% |
10 |
![]() San Antonio |
15 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
15 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
15 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
14 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 48% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
12 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
11 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
10 | 38% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
10 | 37% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
4 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 91% |
2 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 69% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() San Antonio |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 58% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 53% |
18 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 46% |
19 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 46% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 41% |
23 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Orange County in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds has come out and scored the first goal in 52% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 48% of matches.
Meanwhile, Orange County comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 46% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 53% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.