01.04.2017 - 17:00
Stadium: Highmark Stadium
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 34 | 79% | 59% | 32% |
2 | Ottawa Fury | 32 | 56% | 38% | 16% |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 33 | 45% | 27% | 12% |
4 | Penn FC | 32 | 53% | 25% | 16% |
5 | Toronto II | 32 | 47% | 38% | 19% |
6 | Tacoma Defiance | 32 | 66% | 41% | 28% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 33 | 55% | 30% | 18% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 32 | 41% | 25% | 13% |
9 | OKC Energy | 35 | 49% | 23% | 11% |
10 | LA Galaxy II | 32 | 72% | 50% | 22% |
11 | Sacramento Republic | 34 | 41% | 21% | 9% |
12 | Reno 1868 | 33 | 52% | 24% | 15% |
13 | FC Cincinnati | 33 | 73% | 48% | 30% |
14 | Philadelphia Union II | 33 | 64% | 52% | 39% |
15 | Rio Grande Valley | 32 | 56% | 25% | 13% |
16 | Charleston Battery | 33 | 58% | 36% | 24% |
17 | Charlotte Independence | 33 | 73% | 52% | 39% |
18 | New York RB II | 35 | 60% | 40% | 26% |
19 | Colorado Springs | 32 | 56% | 44% | 31% |
20 | Louisville City | 36 | 69% | 50% | 33% |
21 | Real Monarchs | 33 | 52% | 33% | 15% |
22 | Saint Louis | 32 | 66% | 56% | 38% |
23 | Richmond Kickers | 32 | 50% | 25% | 13% |
24 | Portland Timbers II | 32 | 56% | 38% | 16% |
25 | Orange County SC | 32 | 41% | 13% | 9% |
26 | San Antonio | 34 | 59% | 38% | 24% |
27 | Sporting KC II | 36 | 58% | 31% | 14% |
28 | Whitecaps II | 32 | 41% | 22% | 3% |
29 | Orlando City II | 32 | 53% | 41% | 34% |
30 | Rochester Rhinos | 34 | 50% | 24% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 34 | 74% | 56% | 21% |
2 | Ottawa Fury | 32 | 59% | 31% | 13% |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 33 | 64% | 27% | 12% |
4 | Penn FC | 32 | 75% | 47% | 31% |
5 | Toronto II | 32 | 38% | 28% | 16% |
6 | Tacoma Defiance | 32 | 69% | 38% | 9% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 33 | 67% | 36% | 6% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 32 | 53% | 25% | 9% |
9 | OKC Energy | 35 | 57% | 23% | 9% |
10 | LA Galaxy II | 32 | 75% | 53% | 34% |
11 | Sacramento Republic | 34 | 53% | 26% | 12% |
12 | Reno 1868 | 33 | 45% | 21% | 15% |
13 | FC Cincinnati | 33 | 61% | 33% | 21% |
14 | Philadelphia Union II | 33 | 67% | 48% | 30% |
15 | Rio Grande Valley | 32 | 44% | 16% | 13% |
16 | Charleston Battery | 33 | 70% | 42% | 15% |
17 | Charlotte Independence | 33 | 67% | 45% | 15% |
18 | New York RB II | 35 | 57% | 26% | 11% |
19 | Colorado Springs | 32 | 66% | 38% | 9% |
20 | Louisville City | 36 | 56% | 28% | 11% |
21 | Real Monarchs | 33 | 67% | 18% | 6% |
22 | Saint Louis | 32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
23 | Richmond Kickers | 32 | 53% | 22% | 13% |
24 | Portland Timbers II | 32 | 53% | 28% | 6% |
25 | Orange County SC | 32 | 38% | 19% | 13% |
26 | San Antonio | 34 | 56% | 41% | 24% |
27 | Sporting KC II | 36 | 50% | 22% | 8% |
28 | Whitecaps II | 32 | 63% | 22% | 6% |
29 | Orlando City II | 32 | 72% | 34% | 9% |
30 | Rochester Rhinos | 34 | 41% | 18% | 6% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 34 | 68% | 44% | 12% |
2 | Ottawa Fury | 32 | 66% | 34% | 3% |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 33 | 36% | 18% | 6% |
4 | Penn FC | 32 | 34% | 13% | 3% |
5 | Toronto II | 32 | 59% | 25% | 13% |
6 | Tacoma Defiance | 32 | 75% | 41% | 25% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 33 | 55% | 30% | 12% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 32 | 44% | 25% | 13% |
9 | OKC Energy | 35 | 57% | 31% | 9% |
10 | LA Galaxy II | 32 | 47% | 25% | 6% |
11 | Sacramento Republic | 34 | 38% | 21% | 3% |
12 | Reno 1868 | 33 | 64% | 24% | 12% |
13 | FC Cincinnati | 33 | 70% | 45% | 18% |
14 | Philadelphia Union II | 33 | 79% | 30% | 15% |
15 | Rio Grande Valley | 32 | 66% | 41% | 16% |
16 | Charleston Battery | 33 | 55% | 21% | 3% |
17 | Charlotte Independence | 33 | 82% | 52% | 36% |
18 | New York RB II | 35 | 60% | 40% | 26% |
19 | Colorado Springs | 32 | 75% | 34% | 19% |
20 | Louisville City | 36 | 75% | 56% | 44% |
21 | Real Monarchs | 33 | 52% | 27% | 12% |
22 | Saint Louis | 32 | 66% | 41% | 19% |
23 | Richmond Kickers | 32 | 44% | 28% | 9% |
24 | Portland Timbers II | 32 | 66% | 38% | 19% |
25 | Orange County SC | 32 | 59% | 19% | 3% |
26 | San Antonio | 34 | 50% | 32% | 21% |
27 | Sporting KC II | 36 | 72% | 31% | 11% |
28 | Whitecaps II | 32 | 44% | 16% | 6% |
29 | Orlando City II | 32 | 56% | 34% | 22% |
30 | Rochester Rhinos | 34 | 59% | 38% | 6% |
Check out all the card statistics for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs FC Cincinnati here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs FC Cincinnati bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the USL Championship, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.