Phoenix Rising 2 - 0 San Diego Loyal
16.08.2020 - 02:30
Stadium : Casino Arizona Field (Scottsdale, Arizona)
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  North Carolina FC | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 2 |  Indy Eleven | 16 | 9 | 56% |
| 3 |  Miami FC | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 4 |  Tampa Bay Rowdies | 19 | 9 | 47% |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 19 | 13 | 68% |
| 6 |  Las Vegas Lights | 16 | 12 | 75% |
| 7 |  Atlanta United II | 16 | 12 | 75% |
| 8 |  Tacoma Defiance | 16 | 11 | 69% |
| 9 |  Tulsa Roughnecks | 16 | 11 | 69% |
| 10 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 11 |  OKC Energy | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 12 |  LA Galaxy II | 17 | 13 | 76% |
| 13 |  Sacramento Republic | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 14 |  Reno 1868 | 18 | 15 | 83% |
| 15 |  Philadelphia Union II | 16 | 9 | 56% |
| 16 |  Rio Grande Valley | 14 | 10 | 71% |
| 17 |  Charleston Battery | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 18 |  Charlotte Independence | 17 | 12 | 71% |
| 19 |  New York RB II | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 20 |  Colorado Springs | 16 | 11 | 69% |
| 21 |  Louisville City | 19 | 9 | 47% |
| 22 |  Real Monarchs | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 23 |  Saint Louis | 18 | 9 | 50% |
| 24 |  Portland Timbers II | 16 | 11 | 69% |
| 25 |  Orange County SC | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 26 |  San Antonio | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 27 |  Sporting KC II | 16 | 12 | 75% |
| 28 |  New Mexico United | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 29 |  Memphis 901 | 15 | 11 | 73% |
| 30 |  Loudoun United | 13 | 7 | 54% |
| 31 |  Hartford Athletic | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 32 |  Birmingham Legion | 17 | 12 | 71% |
| 33 |  El Paso Locomotive | 19 | 11 | 58% |
| 34 |  Austin Bold | 16 | 12 | 75% |
| 35 | San Diego Loyal | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 2 | Indy Eleven | 10 | 6 | 60% |
| 3 | Miami FC | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 10 | 6 | 60% |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 11 | 7 | 64% |
| 6 | Las Vegas Lights | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 7 | Atlanta United II | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 8 | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 4 | 67% |
| 9 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 10 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 11 | OKC Energy | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 12 | LA Galaxy II | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 13 | Sacramento Republic | 9 | 7 | 78% |
| 14 | Reno 1868 | 10 | 9 | 90% |
| 15 | Philadelphia Union II | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 16 | Rio Grande Valley | 7 | 6 | 86% |
| 17 | Charleston Battery | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 18 | Charlotte Independence | 9 | 7 | 78% |
| 19 | New York RB II | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 20 | Colorado Springs | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 21 | Louisville City | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 22 | Real Monarchs | 11 | 4 | 36% |
| 23 | Saint Louis | 10 | 7 | 70% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers II | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 25 | Orange County SC | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 26 | San Antonio | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 28 | New Mexico United | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 29 | Memphis 901 | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 30 | Loudoun United | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| 31 | Hartford Athletic | 10 | 8 | 80% |
| 32 | Birmingham Legion | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 33 | El Paso Locomotive | 12 | 9 | 75% |
| 34 | Austin Bold | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 35 | San Diego Loyal | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 2 | Indy Eleven | 6 | 3 | 50% |
| 3 | Miami FC | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 6 | Las Vegas Lights | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 7 | Atlanta United II | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 8 | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 7 | 70% |
| 9 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 10 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 11 | OKC Energy | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 12 | LA Galaxy II | 9 | 7 | 78% |
| 13 | Sacramento Republic | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 14 | Reno 1868 | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 15 | Philadelphia Union II | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 16 | Rio Grande Valley | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 17 | Charleston Battery | 10 | 6 | 60% |
| 18 | Charlotte Independence | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 19 | New York RB II | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| 20 | Colorado Springs | 7 | 6 | 86% |
| 21 | Louisville City | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 22 | Real Monarchs | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 23 | Saint Louis | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers II | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 25 | Orange County SC | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 26 | San Antonio | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 14 | 11 | 79% |
| 28 | New Mexico United | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 29 | Memphis 901 | 8 | 7 | 88% |
| 30 | Loudoun United | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 31 | Hartford Athletic | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 32 | Birmingham Legion | 9 | 6 | 67% |
| 33 | El Paso Locomotive | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 34 | Austin Bold | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 35 | San Diego Loyal | 8 | 4 | 50% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Phoenix Rising and San Diego Loyal have both scored and conceded in the same match in the USL Championship.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 19 matches played in the USL Championship, Phoenix Rising has scored and conceded goals in 13 matches. In other words, 68% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 64% at home, while it is 75% away from home.
- Meanwhile, San Diego Loyal has scored and conceded in 8 of their 16 matches so far in the USL Championship, giving them a BTTS rate of 50%. Both teams have scored in 4 of San Diego Loyal’s 8 home matches, and it has happened 4 times in 8 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets