Favourite this Match

Nardò 0 - 1 Città di Fasano

08.09.2019 - 09:00

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

26 7 27%
2
Fidelis Andria Team Logo

Fidelis Andria

26 11 42%
3
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

26 3 12%
4
Nocerina Team Logo

Nocerina

26 13 50%
5
Francavilla Team Logo

Francavilla

26 10 38%
6
Virtus Casarano Team Logo

Virtus Casarano

26 13 50%
7
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

26 12 46%
8
Nardò Team Logo

Nardò

26 12 46%
9
Città di Fasano Team Logo

Città di Fasano

26 12 46%
10
Agropoli Team Logo

Agropoli

26 8 31%
11
Audace Cerignola Team Logo

Audace Cerignola

26 16 62%
12
Bitonto Team Logo

Bitonto

26 6 23%
13
Gelbison Team Logo

Gelbison

26 8 31%
14
Gladiator Team Logo

Gladiator

26 11 42%
15
Team Altamura Team Logo

Team Altamura

26 12 46%
16
Gravina Team Logo

Gravina

26 12 46%
17
Grumentum Team Logo

Grumentum

26 14 54%
18
Brindisi Team Logo

Brindisi

26 12 46%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

14 5 36%
2
Fidelis Andria Team Logo

Fidelis Andria

13 4 31%
3
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

13 1 8%
4
Nocerina Team Logo

Nocerina

12 6 50%
5
Francavilla Team Logo

Francavilla

13 4 31%
6
Virtus Casarano Team Logo

Virtus Casarano

13 8 62%
7
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

14 7 50%
8
Nardò Team Logo

Nardò

13 6 46%
9
Città di Fasano Team Logo

Città di Fasano

12 4 33%
10
Agropoli Team Logo

Agropoli

13 5 38%
11
Audace Cerignola Team Logo

Audace Cerignola

13 11 85%
12
Bitonto Team Logo

Bitonto

14 2 14%
13
Gelbison Team Logo

Gelbison

13 4 31%
14
Gladiator Team Logo

Gladiator

13 6 46%
15
Team Altamura Team Logo

Team Altamura

13 5 38%
16
Gravina Team Logo

Gravina

12 6 50%
17
Grumentum Team Logo

Grumentum

13 7 54%
18
Brindisi Team Logo

Brindisi

13 5 38%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

12 2 17%
2
Fidelis Andria Team Logo

Fidelis Andria

13 7 54%
3
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

13 2 15%
4
Nocerina Team Logo

Nocerina

14 7 50%
5
Francavilla Team Logo

Francavilla

13 6 46%
6
Virtus Casarano Team Logo

Virtus Casarano

13 5 38%
7
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

12 5 42%
8
Nardò Team Logo

Nardò

13 6 46%
9
Città di Fasano Team Logo

Città di Fasano

14 8 57%
10
Agropoli Team Logo

Agropoli

13 3 23%
11
Audace Cerignola Team Logo

Audace Cerignola

13 5 38%
12
Bitonto Team Logo

Bitonto

12 4 33%
13
Gelbison Team Logo

Gelbison

13 4 31%
14
Gladiator Team Logo

Gladiator

13 5 38%
15
Team Altamura Team Logo

Team Altamura

13 7 54%
16
Gravina Team Logo

Gravina

14 6 43%
17
Grumentum Team Logo

Grumentum

13 7 54%
18
Brindisi Team Logo

Brindisi

13 7 54%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Nardò and Città di Fasano have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group H.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 26 matches played in the Serie D Group H, Nardò has scored and conceded goals in 12 matches. In other words, 46% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 46% at home, while it is 46% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Città di Fasano has scored and conceded in 12 of their 26 matches so far in the Serie D Group H, giving them a BTTS rate of 46%. Both teams have scored in 4 of Città di Fasano’s 12 home matches, and it has happened 8 times in 14 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets