# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
26 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
21 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
19 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
19 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
16 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
15 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
15 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
13 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Hangzhou |
13 | 43% |
10 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
12 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
12 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
9 | 30% |
14 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
9 | 30% |
15 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
7 | 23% |
16 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
6 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
13 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
13 | 87% |
3 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
10 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
10 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
7 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Hangzhou |
7 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
6 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
5 | 33% |
12 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
5 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
4 | 27% |
14 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
4 | 27% |
15 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
3 | 20% |
16 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
1 | 7% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
13 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
10 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
8 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
7 | 47% |
7 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
7 | 47% |
8 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
6 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Hangzhou |
6 | 40% |
10 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
6 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
6 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
5 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
5 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
4 | 27% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
3 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
24 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
23 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
21 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
21 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
18 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
18 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
18 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Hangzhou |
17 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
15 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
15 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
14 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
9 | 30% |
16 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
4 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
14 | 93% |
2 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
12 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
11 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 73% |
5 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
10 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
8 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Hangzhou |
8 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
7 | 46% |
11 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
6 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
6 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
5 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
2 | 13% |
16 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
2 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
12 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
10 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
10 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
10 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hangzhou |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
7 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
7 | 46% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
4 | 26% |
16 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
2 | 13% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Nantong Zhiyun and Chengdu Better City FC in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Nantong Zhiyun has come out and scored the first goal in 30% of the matches they have played so far in the Chinese Super League. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 70% of matches.
Meanwhile, Chengdu Better City FC comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 63% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 36% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in Chinese Super League.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.